Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Interracial marriages should be...
Legal 222 86.38%
Illegal 30 11.67%
Not sure 5 1.95%
Voters: 257. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-09-2011, 04:51 PM
 
164 posts, read 104,170 times
Reputation: 49

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by pirate_lafitte View Post
The way I see it, if the state government won't treat you right, then the federal government MUST step in. Part of the reason I don't trust states' rights.
That's funny because the federal gov has been screwing over Americans for hundreds of years.

There is nothing to trust about the federal government whatsoever.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-09-2011, 05:16 PM
 
73,133 posts, read 62,985,569 times
Reputation: 22029
Quote:
Originally Posted by salem baptist View Post
That's funny because the federal gov has been screwing over Americans for hundreds of years.

There is nothing to trust about the federal government whatsoever.
Based on my own family history and some of the things that have happened to my forefathers years back, the state governments can't be trusted either. Slavery, Jim Crow, Plessy vs. Ferguson, just a few reasons I don't trust the state government either. Being African-American, male, and getting close to 25 years old, I have to think of it in terms of "what if I was living back in those days?". That's my perspective.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2011, 07:42 PM
 
210 posts, read 210,721 times
Reputation: 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by pirate_lafitte View Post
And what if those "states rights" are bigoted and discriminatory, as has happened in the past?
but they are not discriminatory..discrimination is Now illegal in all states so its a moot point
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2011, 07:44 PM
 
210 posts, read 210,721 times
Reputation: 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by pirate_lafitte View Post
Based on my own family history and some of the things that have happened to my forefathers years back, the state governments can't be trusted either. Slavery, Jim Crow, Plessy vs. Ferguson, just a few reasons I don't trust the state government either. Being African-American, male, and getting close to 25 years old, I have to think of it in terms of "what if I was living back in those days?". That's my perspective.
but you aren't. You are living In These Days. And i am minority too but that has nothing to do with anything. Discrimination is illegal and its a moot point. States rights are being violated by Medicare, SS, Obamacare and other socialist federal programs being forced on states and this should stop
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2011, 07:57 PM
 
Location: metro ATL
8,180 posts, read 14,924,418 times
Reputation: 2698
Quote:
Originally Posted by tonythetuna View Post
If you polled Black Democrat women anywhere the results would be just as high.
What evidence do you have that Black Democrat women think that interracial marriage should be illegal? The reason why there were anti-miscegenation laws on the books in the first place is because Whites didn't want the so-called purity of their bloodline "polluted" by Black blood. In light of that, there's absolutely no basis that any group of Blacks would be in support of something so inane.

Sorry, but this isn't a case the popular conservative rallying cry of "Blacks are just as racist!"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2011, 08:00 PM
 
Location: metro ATL
8,180 posts, read 14,924,418 times
Reputation: 2698
Quote:
Originally Posted by buddy5 View Post
Then it's up to the voters of those states. I think states who don't allow concealed weapons to be discriminatory and biased against constitutional rights. So, I don't live there. You take care of your states business and I'll take care of mine.
Wow, I don't even want to know what you thought about Civil Rights legislation in the 60's and the feds' enforcement of such.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2011, 08:15 PM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,239 posts, read 19,560,171 times
Reputation: 5365
Quote:
Originally Posted by tonythetuna View Post
If you polled Black Democrat women anywhere the results would be just as high.
Nope. Again Alabama had this on the ballot back in 2000, for the most part support for ending the ban or support for keeping the ban in place was determined on the party and demographic makeup of the county.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2011, 08:29 PM
 
210 posts, read 210,721 times
Reputation: 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by Akhenaton06 View Post
Wow, I don't even want to know what you thought about Civil Rights legislation in the 60's and the feds' enforcement of such.
THATS all a moot point Now..states can enforce their own rights
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2011, 08:30 PM
 
210 posts, read 210,721 times
Reputation: 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smash255 View Post
Nope. Again Alabama had this on the ballot back in 2000, for the most part support for ending the ban or support for keeping the ban in place was determined on the party and demographic makeup of the county.
ending what ban In 2000? There was no ban At That Time and there isn't one Now
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2011, 08:46 PM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,239 posts, read 19,560,171 times
Reputation: 5365
Quote:
Originally Posted by WALTERWALTER View Post
ending what ban In 2000? There was no ban At That Time and there isn't one Now
Despite the Loving V Virginia ruling in 1967 Alabama still had a law on the books that banned interracial marriage. The law wasn't enforced after Loving V Virginia, but was still on the books. In the 2000 election, a referendum was held to take the law off the books, the referendum passed 59.5-40.5 and the law was officially taken off the books. The heavily black counties (Democratic) voted overwhelmingly to take the law off the books, while many (though not all) of the heavily white counties (Republican) voted to keep the law on the books.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:58 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top