Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Do you support repealing the 17th Amendment to the US Constution?
YES 17 34.00%
NO 33 66.00%
Voters: 50. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-23-2011, 06:57 PM
 
Location: On a Long Island in NY
7,800 posts, read 10,110,162 times
Reputation: 7366

Advertisements

The 17th Amendment, adopted in 1913 allowed for the direct popular election of US Senators. Before this US Senators were appointed by the state legislature. Many have opposed this over the years on the grounds that it took power away from the states.

I believe that the 17th Amendment should be repealed and instead one US Senator would be appointed by the state governor and the other would be appointed by the state legislature.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-23-2011, 07:00 PM
 
Location: Fort Worth, TX
9,394 posts, read 15,694,356 times
Reputation: 6262
Appointed by the governor? Sounds like a recipe for cronyism.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2011, 07:21 PM
 
Location: Central Ohio
10,834 posts, read 14,938,291 times
Reputation: 16587
Quote:
Originally Posted by HurricaneDC View Post
Appointed by the governor? Sounds like a recipe for cronyism.
Having them change every 6 to 12 years every time a new governor comes into office? Sounds like natural term limits to me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2011, 07:22 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,645,820 times
Reputation: 18521
This is exactly how States lost all their rights and representation in the nation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2011, 07:34 PM
 
Location: You Ta Zhou
866 posts, read 1,560,649 times
Reputation: 401
Quote:
Originally Posted by HurricaneDC View Post
Appointed by the governor? Sounds like a recipe for cronyism.
That's what I think too. If the 17th Amendment was not put in the Constitution, who really thinks we would have the new Tea Party representatives in the Senate? We would have the same old politicians there, as well as all sorts of corrupt senators.

I don't understand why anyone really wants to repeal the 17th Amendment. How would that help in any way?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2011, 07:38 PM
 
Location: Pacific NW
9,437 posts, read 7,372,524 times
Reputation: 7979
Quote:
Originally Posted by nicet4 View Post
Having them change every 6 to 12 years every time a new governor comes into office? Sounds like natural term limits to me.
What makes you think a new governor would appoint a different senator? Even though this state is terribly slanted towards one political party (not one I agree with) I'd still rather have senators voted on by the people rather than appointed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2011, 07:41 PM
 
Location: Barrington, IL area
1,594 posts, read 3,057,764 times
Reputation: 4957
Have senators appointed? HAHAHA. No way in hell.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2011, 07:44 PM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,060,237 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
This is exactly how States lost all their rights and representation in the nation.
States lost all rights, puleeze. Be for real, just once.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2011, 07:46 PM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,060,237 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by HurricaneDC View Post
Appointed by the governor? Sounds like a recipe for cronyism.
A recipe that was tried and found to be wanting which is why the 17th Amendment was passed in the first place.

U.S. Senate: Art & History Home > Origins & Development > Institutional Development > Direct Election of Senators
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2011, 07:52 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,645,820 times
Reputation: 18521
You don't get state representation, when like the House members, they are elected by special interest.

A State Governor and legislatures, should be sending someone to Capital Hill.
They have no one representing the States interest any longer.

Things have passed in the Senate that would have never passed, had Senators been appointed by a States governments selection, to represent them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:57 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top