Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-22-2011, 06:16 PM
 
5,346 posts, read 4,048,030 times
Reputation: 545

Advertisements

The Primary Owners of the Federal Reserve Bank Are:

1. Rothschild's of London and Berlin
2. Lazard Brothers of Paris
3. Israel Moses Seaf of Italy
4. Kuhn, Loeb & Co. of Germany and New York
5. Warburg & Company of Hamburg, Germany
6. Lehman Brothers of New York
7. Goldman Sachs of New York
8. Rockefeller Brothers of New York

Not a part of the U.S. Government.

The primary owners are branches of European establishment, almost entirely Jewish. Before I'm called anti-semite, Ashkenazis are NOT Semites... Peace...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-22-2011, 07:17 PM
 
Location: Texas
5,872 posts, read 8,095,507 times
Reputation: 2971
LOL. Your Ron Paul allowance is officially used up for the day. Please come back tomorrow w/ more humorous and laughable "facts".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2011, 07:19 PM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,755,547 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by HC475 View Post
The Primary Owners of the Federal Reserve Bank Are:

1. Rothschild's of London and Berlin
2. Lazard Brothers of Paris
3. Israel Moses Seaf of Italy
4. Kuhn, Loeb & Co. of Germany and New York
5. Warburg & Company of Hamburg, Germany
6. Lehman Brothers of New York
7. Goldman Sachs of New York
8. Rockefeller Brothers of New York

Not a part of the U.S. Government.

Or maybe not.

Criticism of the Federal Reserve - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Member banks ("[a]bout 38 percent of the nation's more than 8,000 banks")[38] are required to own capital stock in their regional banks,[38][39] and the regional banks pay a set 6% dividend on the member banks' paid-in capital stock (not the regional banks' profits) each year, returning the rest to the US Treasury Department.[40] The Fed has noted that this has created "some confusion about 'ownership'":
[Although] the Reserve Banks issue shares of stock to member banks ..., owning Reserve Bank stock is quite different from owning stock in a private company. The Reserve Banks are not operated for profit, and ownership of a certain amount of stock is, by law, a condition of membership in the System. The stock may not be sold, traded, or pledged as security for a loan....[41]"


Quote:
Originally Posted by HC475 View Post
The primary owners are branches of European establishment, almost entirely Jewish. Before I'm called anti-semite, Ashkenazis are NOT Semites... Peace...
OK, does Jew hater make you feel better?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2011, 07:28 PM
 
10,854 posts, read 9,303,308 times
Reputation: 3122
Quote:
Originally Posted by shorebaby View Post
Or maybe not.

Criticism of the Federal Reserve - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Member banks ("[a]bout 38 percent of the nation's more than 8,000 banks")[38] are required to own capital stock in their regional banks,[38][39] and the regional banks pay a set 6% dividend on the member banks' paid-in capital stock (not the regional banks' profits) each year, returning the rest to the US Treasury Department.[40] The Fed has noted that this has created "some confusion about 'ownership'":
[Although] the Reserve Banks issue shares of stock to member banks ..., owning Reserve Bank stock is quite different from owning stock in a private company. The Reserve Banks are not operated for profit, and ownership of a certain amount of stock is, by law, a condition of membership in the System. The stock may not be sold, traded, or pledged as security for a loan....[41]"


OK, does Jew hater make you feel better?
There is an EN0RMOUS AMOUNT of IGNORANCE of how the FED actually operates and how it is governed among the many Americans.

It's obvious some politicians have exploited this for political gain.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2011, 07:39 PM
 
5,346 posts, read 4,048,030 times
Reputation: 545
Quote:
Originally Posted by txgolfer130 View Post
LOL. Your Ron Paul allowance is officially used up for the day. Please come back tomorrow w/ more humorous and laughable "facts".
Ron Paul says he will audit the British controlled "Fed" and will get support from congress...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2011, 06:21 AM
 
5,346 posts, read 4,048,030 times
Reputation: 545
Quote:
Originally Posted by shorebaby View Post
Or maybe not.

Criticism of the Federal Reserve - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Member banks ("[a]bout 38 percent of the nation's more than 8,000 banks")[38] are required to own capital stock in their regional banks,[38][39] and the regional banks pay a set 6% dividend on the member banks' paid-in capital stock (not the regional banks' profits) each year, returning the rest to the US Treasury Department.[40] The Fed has noted that this has created "some confusion about 'ownership'":
[Although] the Reserve Banks issue shares of stock to member banks ..., owning Reserve Bank stock is quite different from owning stock in a private company. The Reserve Banks are not operated for profit, and ownership of a certain amount of stock is, by law, a condition of membership in the System. The stock may not be sold, traded, or pledged as security for a loan....[41]"


OK, does Jew hater make you feel better?
Quote:
Originally Posted by JazzyTallGuy View Post
There is an EN0RMOUS AMOUNT of IGNORANCE of how the FED actually operates and how it is governed among the many Americans.

It's obvious some politicians have exploited this for political gain.
Actually there was a minor audit and it was exposed the Fed bailed out foreign banks.

"Over $10 trillion was given to the Federal Reserve and member banks and trillions more went to foreign banks. This information was disclosed thanks to the bill introduced by Congressman Ron Paul (R-Texas) which proposed making the Federal Reserve transparent and subject to audits but the final version had been stripped down.
Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont), a self described socialist, had been responsible for gutting the bill but now may be having second thoughts. He stated, “Perhaps most surprising is the huge sum that went to bail out foreign private banks and corporations. As a result of this disclosure, other members of Congress and I will be taking a very extensive look at all aspects of how the Federal Reserve functions.

Audit Reveals Fed Bailout of Foreign Banks Cost Trillions | Conscious Life News


"The Federal Reserve was forced by Congress to disclose over 21000 transactions made between December 2007 and July 2010, which were previously unknown to Congress and the public. These secret transactions resulted in over 3.3 trillion dollars being loaned at nearly zero percent interest to foreign banks, foreign corporations, and corporations within the United States. The 3.3 trillion dollar loans were not made at the behest of Congress, because any bill passed, or any legislative process at all for that matter. The United States public was not aware of the $165 billion dollars given to the United Bank of Switzerland(UBS) nor did the general public know about the $97 billion dollars doled out to the Deutsche Bank in Germany."

The Federal Reserve’s 3.3 Trillion Dollar Bailout of Foreign Banks and Corporations | Unelected.org


"The Federal Reserve was court ordered to release more than 28,000 pages of documents. Back in 2008, late Bloomberg News reporter Mark Pittman requested documents through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) regarding banks that received loans from the Federal Reserve in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis. The FOIA requires all government agencies to disclose their records to any person who requests them in writing. The Fed, however, refused to disclose the names of banks and other companies that they bailed out. They claimed that releasing this information would stigmatize and hurt borrowing banks by causing “severe and irreparable competitive injury.” It’s clear that the Fed is desperately trying to keep their books hidden for their own sake.

http://www.freedomworks.org/blog/jbo...sive-foreign-b (broken link)

Thanks poster "Loveshiscountry":
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2011, 06:37 AM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,755,547 times
Reputation: 3146
Ok so now you are changing directions and are concerned about fed lending to foreign central banks. At least you didn't try to defend your fairy tail of an original post.

So now to debunk your latest conspiracy theory.

Fed Loans to Foreign Central Banks Justified
"Yes, billions of dollars were loaned to key foreign central banks, such as the European Central Bank and the Bank of England, so they could in turn lend dollars to banks in their jurisdictions. Some loans went directly to foreign banks that active in U.S. markets. However, with the interbank lending market frozen, and those foreign banks unable to borrow dollars, they could have been forced to dump many U.S. assets and do severe damage to American institutions.

That's evidence of the broad interconnectedness of world financial markets, not an indication of malfeasance on the part of the Fed--as Sanders implies.

As the Fed said in a statement, most of the loans were fully secured and short-term. Most of the loan facilities were phased out as markets stabilized. There were no credit losses on those and the Fed said it expects none on the few remaining programs."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2011, 06:44 AM
 
5,346 posts, read 4,048,030 times
Reputation: 545
Quote:
Originally Posted by HC475 View Post
Actually there was a minor audit and it was exposed the Fed bailed out foreign banks.

"Over $10 trillion was given to the Federal Reserve and member banks and trillions more went to foreign banks. This information was disclosed thanks to the bill introduced by Congressman Ron Paul (R-Texas) which proposed making the Federal Reserve transparent and subject to audits but the final version had been stripped down.
Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont), a self described socialist, had been responsible for gutting the bill but now may be having second thoughts. He stated, “Perhaps most surprising is the huge sum that went to bail out foreign private banks and corporations. As a result of this disclosure, other members of Congress and I will be taking a very extensive look at all aspects of how the Federal Reserve functions.

Audit Reveals Fed Bailout of Foreign Banks Cost Trillions | Conscious Life News


"The Federal Reserve was forced by Congress to disclose over 21000 transactions made between December 2007 and July 2010, which were previously unknown to Congress and the public. These secret transactions resulted in over 3.3 trillion dollars being loaned at nearly zero percent interest to foreign banks, foreign corporations, and corporations within the United States. The 3.3 trillion dollar loans were not made at the behest of Congress, because any bill passed, or any legislative process at all for that matter. The United States public was not aware of the $165 billion dollars given to the United Bank of Switzerland(UBS) nor did the general public know about the $97 billion dollars doled out to the Deutsche Bank in Germany."

The Federal Reserve’s 3.3 Trillion Dollar Bailout of Foreign Banks and Corporations | Unelected.org


"The Federal Reserve was court ordered to release more than 28,000 pages of documents. Back in 2008, late Bloomberg News reporter Mark Pittman requested documents through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) regarding banks that received loans from the Federal Reserve in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis. The FOIA requires all government agencies to disclose their records to any person who requests them in writing. The Fed, however, refused to disclose the names of banks and other companies that they bailed out. They claimed that releasing this information would stigmatize and hurt borrowing banks by causing “severe and irreparable competitive injury.” It’s clear that the Fed is desperately trying to keep their books hidden for their own sake.

http://www.freedomworks.org/blog/jbo...sive-foreign-b (broken link)

Thanks poster "Loveshiscountry":
Quote:
Originally Posted by shorebaby View Post
Ok so now you are changing directions and are concerned about fed lending to foreign central banks. At least you didn't try to defend your fairy tail of an original post.

So now to debunk your latest conspiracy theory.

Fed Loans to Foreign Central Banks Justified
"Yes, billions of dollars were loaned to key foreign central banks, such as the European Central Bank and the Bank of England, so they could in turn lend dollars to banks in their jurisdictions. Some loans went directly to foreign banks that active in U.S. markets. However, with the interbank lending market frozen, and those foreign banks unable to borrow dollars, they could have been forced to dump many U.S. assets and do severe damage to American institutions.

That's evidence of the broad interconnectedness of world financial markets, not an indication of malfeasance on the part of the Fed--as Sanders implies.

As the Fed said in a statement, most of the loans were fully secured and short-term. Most of the loan facilities were phased out as markets stabilized. There were no credit losses on those and the Fed said it expects none on the few remaining programs."
I'm not changing directions at all... The "Fed" is a private bank run by EUROPEAN investors...

The Primary Owners of the Federal Reserve Bank Are:

1. Rothschild's of London and Berlin
2. Lazard Brothers of Paris
3. Israel Moses Seaf of Italy
4. Kuhn, Loeb & Co. of Germany and New York
5. Warburg & Company of Hamburg, Germany
6. Lehman Brothers of New York
7. Goldman Sachs of New York
8. Rockefeller Brothers of New York

Not a part of the U.S. Government.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2011, 06:48 AM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,755,547 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by HC475 View Post
The Primary Owners of the Federal Reserve Bank Are:

1. Rothschild's of London and Berlin
2. Lazard Brothers of Paris
3. Israel Moses Seaf of Italy
4. Kuhn, Loeb & Co. of Germany and New York
5. Warburg & Company of Hamburg, Germany
6. Lehman Brothers of New York
7. Goldman Sachs of New York
8. Rockefeller Brothers of New York

Not a part of the U.S. Government.

The primary owners are branches of European establishment, almost entirely Jewish. Before I'm called anti-semite, Ashkenazis are NOT Semites... Peace...
Too funny, I just noticed, one of the "owners" of the Fed is out of business, I will give a hardy cheer to the person who identifies the firm first!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2011, 06:49 AM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,755,547 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by HC475 View Post
I'm not changing directions at all... The "Fed" is a private bank run by EUROPEAN investors...

The Primary Owners of the Federal Reserve Bank Are:

1. Rothschild's of London and Berlin
2. Lazard Brothers of Paris
3. Israel Moses Seaf of Italy
4. Kuhn, Loeb & Co. of Germany and New York
5. Warburg & Company of Hamburg, Germany
6. Lehman Brothers of New York
7. Goldman Sachs of New York
8. Rockefeller Brothers of New York

Not a part of the U.S. Government.
Bzzzzzzzz! Wrong again, see the link above for the structure of the fed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:04 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top