Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: With the economy on the edge of collapse, should we cut?
Yes, we should cut 2.5 trillion, it will help the economy 21 16.54%
We should cut 6 trillion 28 22.05%
Not good enough, we need to cut 9 trillion, that will definitely help our economy 49 38.58%
Actually we need a 3 trillion dollar stimulus 29 22.83%
Voters: 127. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-04-2011, 11:52 AM
 
2,963 posts, read 6,264,386 times
Reputation: 1578

Advertisements

Hard right conservatives, do you think it's really a good idea to cut 2.5 trillion out of the economy? Or do you think its not good enough, that we should cut even more, and that will help the economy?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-04-2011, 11:58 AM
 
Location: Portland, OR
605 posts, read 705,432 times
Reputation: 585
Hard right is out for anything that would make the current administration look bad. Even if it contridicts with their values, goals, what's-good-for-the-country, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2011, 12:00 PM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,173,997 times
Reputation: 21743
Quote:
Originally Posted by Majin View Post
Hard right conservatives, do you think it's really a good idea to cut 2.5 trillion out of the economy? Or do you think its not good enough, that we should cut even more, and that will help the economy?
As usual, you ask all the wrong questions.

What makes you believe you can continue to spend $1.5 TRILLION or more each year that you don't have indefinitely?

Pray tell, who on this Earth is going to continue to fund your reckless child-like candy-store spending spree?

Your unfunded liabilities are $108 TRILLION through 2050. You don't have the money, where will you get it?

Your unfunded liabilities at the municipal/State level are $94 TRILLION through 2050. Where will you get that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2011, 12:01 PM
 
2,963 posts, read 6,264,386 times
Reputation: 1578
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
As usual, you ask all the wrong questions.

What makes you believe you can continue to spend $1.5 TRILLION or more each year that you don't have indefinitely?

Pray tell, who on this Earth is going to continue to fund your reckless child-like candy-store spending spree?

Your unfunded liabilities are $108 TRILLION through 2050. You don't have the money, where will you get it?

Your unfunded liabilities at the municipal/State level are $94 TRILLION through 2050. Where will you get that?
So am I to assume you believe we should cut 9 trillion? Or is that not even enough?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2011, 12:03 PM
 
2,083 posts, read 1,621,351 times
Reputation: 1406
I believe we need to start to 'right the ship' and prove to to the rest of the world that we're taking our debt seriously. Making too large of an initial cut could be as destructive as not taking any action at all, since it would impact federal and state budgets across the board, killing jobs and lowering revenues.

However, sitting on our hands and letting the debt grow is shaking the faith of international investors. If they think they only way out for us is to turn on the printing presses or think we will continue blissfully down the road of $1.5 trillion annual deficits, our lenders will cut us off.

I favor a gradual budget decrease that will reign in spending slowly to avoid rocking the boat domestically while increasing goodwill with our lenders worldwide. I also favor the balanced budget amendment, which I think could go into effect by the end of the decade if DC could put their partisan bickering on hold and do what needs to be done.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2011, 12:04 PM
 
1,168 posts, read 1,245,042 times
Reputation: 912
Government spending is NOT the economy
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2011, 12:05 PM
 
45,582 posts, read 27,203,264 times
Reputation: 23898
Quote:
Originally Posted by Annilyna View Post
Hard right is out for anything that would make the current administration look bad. Even if it contridicts with their values, goals, what's-good-for-the-country, etc.
So you're saying we can get the money to pay for all of this?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2011, 12:08 PM
 
Location: Out in the Badlands
10,420 posts, read 10,832,599 times
Reputation: 7801
Quote:
Originally Posted by Majin View Post
Hard right conservatives, do you think it's really a good idea to cut 2.5 trillion out of the economy? Or do you think its not good enough, that we should cut even more, and that will help the economy?
Oh... no... spend trillions upon trillions that we don't have and tax the liven bejesus out of us....that would surely be the left wing solution. And...wall street sure likes it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2011, 12:11 PM
 
Location: North Carolina
572 posts, read 1,611,215 times
Reputation: 496
It's such a simple concept. The government should spend EXACTLY what it collects in revenue. No less, no more.

You take in 5 trillion, you spend 5 trillion

NOT, you take in 5 trillion , you spend 7 trillion. (duh)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2011, 12:15 PM
 
Location: Southern Minnesota
5,984 posts, read 13,418,437 times
Reputation: 3371
We don't need to cut spending, we need another stimulus, and an even bigger one this time. A new 'New Deal' that invests in updating our nation's transit infrastructure and park system, as well as other public works. We also need to end the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya, cut military spending and return to pre-Reagan tax levels to make up the deficit in the future. Right now, we can't afford to worry about the deficit, we need to prevent the economy from collapsing again and lay a solid foundation for future economic growth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:23 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top