Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Wrong. Men do not experience or suffer the perils of pregnancy. Until they do, they have no say in what a woman chooses to do with her body. The best they can do is to be very discriminating about in whom they choose to deposit their sperm.
...you don't think abortion is a tough decision???
Abortion is a tough decidion for some women. In my opinion, for the many women who consider an embryo or fetus a clump of cells; for the many who don't want to become pregnant but don't use bc; for those who view abortion as no different than treating a medical condition like diabetes or heart disease more than a medical procedure... maybe it's an easy decision.
No, I'm saying that instead of telling people what they can and can't do based on your own personal mentality, you have to understand there are people that WILL kill their children, whether we make it legal or not.
What I'm saying is, your solution isn't the right one, or even the best one.
What I'm saying is, it's awful easy to stand on a high horse and say that abortion shouldn't be allowed and women should "pay for their actions" but you're not considering the children that would pay for being forced to "be".
...you don't think abortion is a tough decision???
Abortion isn't a tough decision for pro abortionists because they have no value for life.
It didn't take long for the pro-lifers to use Steve Jobs to push their agenda. Just how many "geniuses" are born every generation, legitimate or not?
Sadly, statistics show that adoptees are more likely to turn out to be a serial killer than a Steve Jobs. And let's be honest- Steve Jobs may have been a genius but he was also a psychopath boss.
Of the 500 estimated serial killers in U.S. history, 16 percent were adopted as children, while adoptees represent only 2 or 3 percent of the general population.
The study also found corporate movers and shakers are four times more likely to be psychopaths than the general population. Some of the reasons their psychopathic tendencies may not be obvious at work are favorable environmental factors, such as positive upbringing at home or a happy childhood. Without helpful factors, a psychopath could potentially turn into a serial killer.
How about this one...In 1937, Subha Tulfah al Mussallat was a young Sunni woman in a broken marriage who discovered she was pregnant. In 1930s Iraq her options were quite limited. She could have an abortion something that was risky and she would have to travel to Baghdad, or she could get try to get re-married. After traveling to Baghdad for an abortion a religious family convinced her to keep the child so she returned home to Tikrit and got re-married.
And so it was in 1937, that a baby boy named Saddam Hussein was born in Tikrit Iraq...It cuts both ways hun.
Fail.
The vast majority of people are good, not evil.
But abortion proponents love to pretend any baby has at least a 50/50 chance of being massively evil.
Sorry, it doesn't work that way.
You're almost always obliterating a good person.
Originally Posted by Phantasy Tokoro the choice should be left up to the person who's going to be incubating the parasite for 9-10 months.
What a disgusting viewpoint.
How does one get to such a point?
Each of your posts makes me pity you more.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.