Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-12-2011, 12:01 AM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,488,320 times
Reputation: 9618

Advertisements

even the dumbocrat CONTROLLED senate realized its..the obama anti-jobs bill

he still pushing that bigger government anti-jobs bill


it wont create any private sector jobs...just more government jobs with its 'new' department

the establishment of ANOTHER GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT (bigger government)

SEC. 245. ESTABLISHMENT AND GENERAL AUTHORITY OF AIFA. (a) Establishment of AIFA- The American Infrastructure Financing Authority is established as a wholly owned Government corporation. (b) General Authority of AIFA- AIFA shall provide direct loans and loan guarantees to facilitate infrastructure projects that are both economically viable and of regional or national significance, and shall have such other authority, as provided in this Act.

page 40

in reading it it sounds like a fannie/freddie on steriods

and then there is

SECTION 284. ESTABLISHMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY BROADBAND CORPORATION.


and then this:

SEC. 261. PROJECT REBUILD (a) Direct Appropriations.— There is appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, $15,000,000,000, to remain available until September 30, 2014, for assistance to eligible entities including States and units of general local government (as such terms are defined in section 102 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (42U.S.C. 5302)), and qualified nonprofit organizations, businesses or consortia of eligible entities for the redevelopment of abandoned and foreclosed-upon properties and for the stabilization of affected neighborhoods.

this to bail out Freddie/Fannie in the rehabbing of homes that are "unmarketable" instead of leaving these to be auctioned "as is" and rehabbed through the private sector?






its not a jobs bill...its an expand socialism bill
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-12-2011, 12:12 AM
 
Location: Y-Town Area
4,009 posts, read 5,733,962 times
Reputation: 3499

MSNBC: Senate Republicans Kill Jobs Bill - YouTube
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2011, 12:36 AM
 
Location: Sarasota FL
6,864 posts, read 12,080,222 times
Reputation: 6744
Headline should read 'Half a trillion dollar stimulus II union slush fund' not passed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2011, 12:42 AM
 
Location: South Dakota
2,608 posts, read 2,097,732 times
Reputation: 769
Yea!!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2011, 01:25 AM
 
10,875 posts, read 13,813,272 times
Reputation: 4896
Quote:
Originally Posted by BucsLose View Post
First off, duplicate thread topic. Second, quit blaming the other side for not getting YOUR side together.

I know, I know. The liberal talking points is to blame the Republicans. But that doesnt change the truth.

But dont worry, I didnt expect anything less from you.
Huh??? All the democrats but two voted in favor of job creation and balancing the budget. The GOP blocked the bill as they will not support anything that doesn't allow them to keep bankrolling the rich and mega corporations on taxpayer dime.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2011, 05:13 AM
 
46,289 posts, read 27,108,503 times
Reputation: 11129
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
All the Repubs are on record plus a couple of Dems. That is what the vote was for. There was never any thought a filibuster could be avoided. There will be more votes on the individual pieces. More recorded votes .....
So this is why dirty harry never brings a vote in the senate...just tables them...he does not want to go on record....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2011, 05:15 AM
 
46,289 posts, read 27,108,503 times
Reputation: 11129
Quote:
Originally Posted by postingMan View Post
If 96% of a group votes for something that usually means they support it.
If you have .99 cents...do you have $1.00? The answer is no.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2011, 05:21 AM
C.C
 
2,235 posts, read 2,363,273 times
Reputation: 461
To reiterate what others have pointed out:

1) The bill voted on was not the bill obama submitted - that bill was so toxic among dems that Reid had to change Senate rules to AVOID a vote on it.

2) Several dems who voted yes on cloture made it clear that that they would vote no on passage. If they were being truthful, an up or down vote would have failed anyway. As Sanrene said, that would have been a huge repudiation of obama - he should be breathing a sigh of relief that it didn't happen.

This fiasco again highlights that obama's incompetence knows no bounds. He didn't bother to consult his own party in the Senate to devise a bill that would get 100% of their support, even after Reid changed the most egregious provisions. And to actually "win" the debate without winning the vote, he needed a vote or two from the ME or MA repubs. Instead he proposed a bill that was politically painless for them to oppose.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2011, 05:25 AM
 
Location: Va. Beach
6,391 posts, read 5,168,625 times
Reputation: 2283
Quote:
Originally Posted by gvsteve View Post
Republicans voted against it. Of course he's going to blame the Republicans.

Remember, there are only 46 republicans, one didn't vote due to surgery, and there were 49 votes against it.

Additionally, there are 2 more democrats and an independent who have stated that unless there are alterations to the bill, they will vote against final passage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2011, 05:29 AM
 
46,289 posts, read 27,108,503 times
Reputation: 11129
Quote:
Originally Posted by mmmjv View Post
No, we didn't lose. It was the Republicans that lost. They are making a mockery of the Senate rules and a mockery of the filibuster. That makes them losers
Now you are just getting frustrated....Harry Reid did not even vote for this bill....please tell me how and why it's the republicans fault?

If your going to complain about the reubs "tableing" a bill, then you better be complaining about Harry "tableing" all those bills that passed the house...with both repub and dem votes...

This is just getting funny now the way the left is still saying it's all the repubs fault...just keep it up lefties...the people are finally starting to awake.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:30 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top