Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-14-2011, 06:42 AM
 
4,255 posts, read 3,480,513 times
Reputation: 992

Advertisements

Actualy , in several states they do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-14-2011, 06:43 AM
 
17,291 posts, read 29,408,066 times
Reputation: 8691
Quote:
Originally Posted by ringwise View Post
What are "gay" rights, exactly? I was under the impression that gay people got every right that a straight person does in this country. So I'm to understand that they want extra rights? That's unconstitutional.
No. You're not "to understand," and you "don't understand."


What is the "extra right" being sought by proponents of gay marriage?

If gay marriage is allowed, what prevents a straight person from entering into a gay marriage? Other than the same thing that prevents a gay person from entering into a straight marriage?

Would YOU want your son or daughter to marry a gay person? How is that good for relationships or society?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-14-2011, 06:44 AM
 
Location: Illinois
2,430 posts, read 2,768,111 times
Reputation: 336
Default I think two people could incorporate

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmforte View Post
But I love my toaster!! Can I have a civil union with it?
.........In fact they would be treated better under the tax law. No one asks any sexual preference , aberrant behavior questions when you file for incorporation.
IS GAY MARRIAGE A SOUND FINANCIAL DECISSION..........IS IT A GOOD IDEA, OR A MOVEMENT TO IGNORE THE KINGS CLOTHES. ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-14-2011, 06:46 AM
 
17,291 posts, read 29,408,066 times
Reputation: 8691
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Comparing marriage to a toaster is stupid.. You dont own your spouse, you dont buy your spouse, we dont have slavery in america.

who's the idiot that needs this expained to them?

Lol, seriously? What is hard to understand?

It is the social conservative idiocy that goes something like this:

"If we allow gay marriage, we are on a slippery slope to polygamy, people marrying dogs and children and inanimate objects."

The OP's link succinctly (and graphically, for those used to reading with accompanying pictures) shows in clear, easy language why those arguments are stupid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-14-2011, 06:46 AM
 
1,615 posts, read 2,575,355 times
Reputation: 808
Quote:
Originally Posted by waterboy7375 View Post
Actualy , in several states they do.
not in MY state. and why should i have to move away from family and friends BY MYSELF to another state to get married when i don't even like change that much? and even in those states it's not FULL marriage because of doma which prevents the federal benefits.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-14-2011, 06:48 AM
 
4,255 posts, read 3,480,513 times
Reputation: 992
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rlarson21 View Post
not in MY state. and why should i have to move away from family and friends BY MYSELF to another state to get married when i don't even like change that much? and even in those states it's not FULL marriage because of doma which prevents the federal benefits.

First let me say I am and have always supported gay marriage, .That being said , if civil unions gave you exactly the same benefits as marriage would that be good enough for you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-14-2011, 06:50 AM
 
1,615 posts, read 2,575,355 times
Reputation: 808
Quote:
Originally Posted by waterboy7375 View Post
First let me say I am and have always supported gay marriage, .That being said , if civil unions gave you exactly the same benefits as marriage would that be good enough for you?
well, what we mean by 'gay marriage' is a civil marriage contract. nothing to do with the religious side, that's up to religions. but civil unions can't give us those things as long as doma is considered constitutional.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-14-2011, 06:50 AM
 
23,838 posts, read 23,127,661 times
Reputation: 9409
I haven't (and won't) clicked on the link. But for me it's less about denying anyone their rights and more about finding a middle ground (marriage vs. civil unions). Homosexuals won't rest until they take down the institution of marriage, as well as accomplish de facto acceptance of the homosexual lifestyle via constitutional law. Being gay is not the issue - the issue is that homosexuals believe that what they engage in is normal, natural, and right, and thus expect the rest of America to embrace this abomination via legal avenues. If homosexuals were in anyway tolerant themselves, there would be less friction. But they're not, so they get high levels of pushback, and rightfully so.

That's the problem that many of us have with the Gay Agenda.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-14-2011, 06:52 AM
 
4,255 posts, read 3,480,513 times
Reputation: 992
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rlarson21 View Post
well, what we mean by 'gay marriage' is a civil marriage contract. nothing to do with the religious side, that's up to religions. but civil unions can't give us those things as long as doma is considered constitutional.
Ok ,lets say DOMA was scrapped and a civil union gave you everything a marriage did, would that be good enough?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-14-2011, 06:55 AM
 
1,615 posts, read 2,575,355 times
Reputation: 808
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
I haven't (and won't) clicked on the link. But for me it's less about denying anyone their rights and more about finding a middle ground (marriage vs. civil unions). Homosexuals won't rest until they take down the institution of marriage, as well as accomplish de facto acceptance of the homosexual lifestyle via constitutional law. Being gay is not the issue - the issue is that homosexuals believe that what they engage in is normal, natural, and right, and thus expect the rest of America to embrace this abomination via law.

That's the problem that many of us have with the Gay Agenda.
well.

1. there is no such thing as the 'homosexual lifestyle'. there are people born with the trait of a homosexual orientation, but that has nothing to do with what lifestyle somoene might have. i'm a 34 year old virgin living in north dakota, who doesn't do drugs and rarely drinks and is college education, attending a masters program in pastoral counseling. in what way do RICKY MARTIN in i share the same lifestyle?

do all people born heterosexual have the same lifestyle?

2. we aren't trying to 'take down' marriage. it's not OUR FAULT that we're gay and obviously we aren't going to have a heterosexual marriage because this would be mean both to us and to the other person who we'd lie to to have the marriage.

3. what we engage in (if anything) of course is natural and in accordance with the orientation that we were born with. it has NOTHING to do with STRAIGHT people having GAY SEX. .. THAT would be unnatural.

you seem to have the very basics of the situation wrong. you are very misinformed.

also CIVIL UNIONS are NOT the 'middle ground' it's what every married couple NOW has. if they got married in a church they got the ADDITION MARRIAGE ceremony but legally it's a civil union. that's what we want and deserve constitutionally.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:31 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top