Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-18-2011, 04:45 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,026 posts, read 44,840,107 times
Reputation: 13714

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by HistorianDude View Post
You are not.
I posted exact quotes and links to the documents. You're posting unsubstantiated opinions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-18-2011, 04:45 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,080,363 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Worse yet, he's a teacher.
Wrong yet again.

My god, but you seem incapable of putting fingers to keyboard without subtracting from the sum total of human knowledge.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2011, 04:46 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,080,363 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
I posted exact quotes and links to the documents. You're posting unsubstantiated opinions.
You can quote anything you want all day long. But you need to actually show where a misquotation has occurred.

None has.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2011, 04:48 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,026 posts, read 44,840,107 times
Reputation: 13714
Quote:
Originally Posted by HistorianDude View Post
Wrong yet again.
You were outed in another thread...
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrlqban View Post
Yep, I was just hoping that teacher Historiandude or company would elaborate in regards to the English Common Law and those infamous "doubts" in Minor...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2011, 04:49 PM
 
3,335 posts, read 2,986,432 times
Reputation: 921
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Epitomizes "misnomer," no?

Worse yet, he's a teacher.
Oh God help us. Just another reason to home school the little ones.

Is he a History teacher?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2011, 04:49 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,080,363 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Why would you assume SCOTUS was referring to anything else?
Because it is cretinous to to assert (as you do here) that SCOTUS believed that the children of any aliens born on US soil after Independence would be British Subjects.

And I do not believe that the Supreme Court is filled with cretins.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2011, 04:50 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,080,363 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
You were outed in another thread...
They were wrong too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2011, 04:51 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,026 posts, read 44,840,107 times
Reputation: 13714
Quote:
Originally Posted by HistorianDude View Post
You can quote anything you want all day long. But you need to actually show where a misquotation has occurred.
Already shown, here:
http://www.city-data.com/forum/22174661-post113.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2011, 04:52 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,080,363 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
You demonstrate no misquotation there whatsoever.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2011, 04:57 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,026 posts, read 44,840,107 times
Reputation: 13714
Quote:
Originally Posted by HistorianDude View Post
Because it is cretinous to to assert (as you do here) that SCOTUS believed that the children of any aliens born on US soil after Independence would be British Subjects.
SCOTUS never stated that. Not sure why you would make such a ridiculous assumption.

What SCOTUS did state was that children of aliens born in England were natural born subjects.

Read it again:
Quote:
"It thus clearly appears that, by the law of England for the last three centuries, beginning before the settlement of this country and continuing to the present day, aliens, while residing in the dominions possessed by the Crown of England, were within the allegiance, the obedience, the faith or loyalty, the protection, the power, the jurisdiction of the English Sovereign, and therefore every child born in England of alien parents was a natural-born subject unless the child of an ambassador or other diplomatic agent of a foreign State or of an alien enemy in hostile occupation of the place where the child was born."
United States v. Wong Kim Ark
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:55 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top