Big Stink! Born to an American Citizen vs, the language Born to American Citizens. Plural??

[HistorianDude]

Originally Posted by InformedConsent

My posts include linked documentation, as I said. For those not too lazy to research, learn, and think for themselves, that is...

And yet no real judges at any level agree with them.

A reasonable person would puzzle at that disconnect.

[HistorianDude]

Originally Posted by InformedConsent

Not all had lawyers, did they.

There you go.

Those with Birther lawyers do no better than those without lawyers at all.

[wrecking ball]

on a side note, "30 rock" had a birther joke on last night.

just thought i'd share.

[HistorianDude]

On another side note, for those Birthers who kept insisting that Orly's subpoena's were "issued by the judge" guess what?

Judge Malihi has just said himself that he doesn't have the authority to do so:

Georgia - Farrar -V- Obama Order Denying Motion for Letters Rogatory

[Robert Laity]

Originally Posted by BentBow

Who knew?

US Citizen, is very different than Natural born US Citizen.

Then add the plural and something stinks of high heaven!

Watch just the first 30 seconds of this very educational video.
My jaw dropped in the first 30 seconds and it is Obama himself saying it.







This needs to go Viral!

ONe MUST be born ON US SOIL of Parents who are BOTH Americans to be POTUS;

See Minor v. Happersett,SCOTUS

[HistorianDude]

Originally Posted by Robert Laity

ONe MUST be born ON US SOIL of Parents who are BOTH Americans to be POTUS;

Gong! Next Contestant please!

Originally Posted by Robert Laity

See Minor v. Happersett,SCOTUS

1. Minor was a suffrage case, not a citizenship case.

2. Virginia Minor's citizenship was never even an issue before the court. A court cannot set precedent for issues that are not even before it.

3. The case said that children of citizens born on US soil were natural born citizens. It did not say that natural born citizens were children of citizens born on US soil. The difference is fundamental and profound.

Google - Logical Fallacy: Denying the Antecedent

4. The decision explicitly refuses to provide a comprehensive definition, and defers deciding on the status of children of aliens born on US soil to a later court. That court was, of course, US v. Wong Kim Ark.

5. US v. Wong Kim Ark is the only decision in SCOTUS history that has ever been cited as precedent regarding the definition of natural born citizen.

[wrecking ball]

Originally Posted by Robert Laity

ONe MUST be born ON US SOIL of Parents who are BOTH Americans to be POTUS;

See Minor v. Happersett,SCOTUS

wow. did you read any of this thread?

[MiamiRob]

You "birthers" and Pukes have nothing else to offer the American people so you resort back to his "birth certificate" issue which has been settled and is now becoming quite tiresome. Get a life already.