Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-07-2012, 07:45 PM
 
Location: North America
5,960 posts, read 5,547,627 times
Reputation: 1951

Advertisements

The Problem of "National Debt" - a libertarian solution - not a pseudo cancellation, but the acknowledgement of individual responsibility

Quote:
Now, in a National State, nothing is voluntary, — and even less so when the Governments of said ``Poor Countries´´ do not even have the pretense of being democratic. And even when these States are democracies, a libertarian will claim that its citizens did not have the choice of being subjects of the State or not: only the acknowledgment of the individual right for anyone to secede unilaterally may bring any legitimacy to the entities called ``States´´. From which it follows that the debts contracted ``by States´´, and that serve foremost to enrich the officers of these States and their friends, cannot in any way bind the citizens oppressed by those States, — not anymore than the debts of a slave-owner may fall back upon his former slaves once freed.

Therefore, the solution is simple: Debts only bind those decision-makers who contract them, as well as their direct accomplices. Presidents, ministers, politicians, bureaucrats, generals, activists from significant lobbies and unions, as well as other State-men, all those who detain any political power, direct or indirect, official or unofficial, formal or informal — they each are responsible in accordance to their role in the decision to borrow. Faced with a possible default of payment from the citizens of a Country or from a further Government of said Country, the creditors (banks and other States) may legitimately turn themselves against those persons who lightly committed to paying back the considered debt (the above-mentioned State-men), but they may not turn against those innocent third parties that the oppressed citizens, victims of the borrowers, constitute.

Hence, lenders may recover from the corrupt State-men all the funds they embezzled, as diminished by all the riches that these robbers will have dilapidated. As for the unrecoverable difference, it will remain as a loss to the lenders; this will teach them to lend money to irresponsible parties! Thus, once the financial risk of lending money to Governments will fall upon the contracting parties rather than on innocent third parties, (the taxpayers of both lending and borrowing States), the sources of financing for such operations will quickly dry up.
Libertarians are the only people in America who don't have to apologize to the children who will grow up owing over $300,000 EACH to pay off the debts incurred by liberals and progressives in their flaccid attempt to build a government massive enough to mask real life with the façade of social utopia.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:29 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top