Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-15-2012, 09:18 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,290,033 times
Reputation: 4269

Advertisements

I wonder what our leader will say to the Admiral who says this is the case. I also wonder what happens when Iran, the nation that has the fastest torpedoes in the world uses them with nuclear warheads. They wouldn't do a thing like using those after the US unilaterally gets rid of all but 300 of their nuclear bombs, would they? I bet Obama thinks the answer is no.


U.S. Naval Commander: Iran Has (http://cowboybyte.com/4289/u-s-naval-commander-iran-has-suicide-boats-outfitted-with-large-warheads/ - broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-15-2012, 09:40 PM
 
Location: Los Awesome, CA
8,653 posts, read 6,137,755 times
Reputation: 3368
First off why would anyone use a nuclear armed torpedo? The water would attenuate a large amount of kinetic energy. I’m more worried about them sneaking one out of their country and into America through one of the many unsecured border crossings.

Regarding the Admiral’s observation. I believe our president would ask for the plan to counter this ability and a detailed risk assessment.



Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy View Post
I wonder what our leader will say to the Admiral who says this is the case. I also wonder what happens when Iran, the nation that has the fastest torpedoes in the world uses them with nuclear warheads. They wouldn't do a thing like using those after the US unilaterally gets rid of all but 300 of their nuclear bombs, would they? I bet Obama thinks the answer is no.


U.S. Naval Commander: Iran Has (http://cowboybyte.com/4289/u-s-naval-commander-iran-has-suicide-boats-outfitted-with-large-warheads/ - broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2012, 11:08 PM
 
Location: Maryland about 20 miles NW of DC
6,104 posts, read 5,994,605 times
Reputation: 2479
The Admiral is correct you need a big warhead to blow the **** out of a US Super Carrier. If they can't torpedo it or ram it, they have hundreds of Chinese made anti-ship missiles that could turn one of our multibillion dollar babies into a flaming hulk.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2012, 11:11 PM
 
3,201 posts, read 3,859,880 times
Reputation: 1047
Iran's regime could easily be toppled in a weekend. The problem is Iranians will still be running around like lunatics much like Syria and Iraq.

Military leaders should realize you can't fight a war against an incredibly inferior opponent. Iran is really just worthless.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2012, 12:54 AM
 
Location: Sango, TN
24,868 posts, read 24,403,011 times
Reputation: 8672
I bet their leaders won't be driving them.

They aren't stupid, they are pushing as far as they can, then they'll back down. They don't want to end up whipped off the map, and thats what is going to happen if this course is pursued.

I think we should leave Iran the hell alone, and let the Arab league deal with them. Israel would be smart if they did the same.

Saudi Arabia and most of the Arab countries don't want Iran with the bomb either.

Even a nuclear Iran poses no threat to the United States. One bomb used would be the last thing they ever did, period.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2012, 12:56 AM
 
Location: southern california
61,288 posts, read 87,457,092 times
Reputation: 55563
conventional or dirty bomb will be the likely choice of weapons. calculated to not result in a nuclear retaliation strike.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2012, 03:50 AM
 
Location: Texas
14,076 posts, read 20,539,575 times
Reputation: 7807
Quote:
Originally Posted by joebaldknobber View Post
Iran's regime could easily be toppled in a weekend. The problem is Iranians will still be running around like lunatics much like Syria and Iraq.

Military leaders should realize you can't fight a war against an incredibly inferior opponent. Iran is really just worthless.

Such hubris and underestimation of our enemies has gotten us into trouble before.


The Taliban, Saddam Hussein, the North Vietnamese, Somali warlords and Lebanese militia's were "easy" to defeat too. And, that's just recently. Going back a little further, we could include the Philippine insurrectionist's, the Seminoles, the Confederate states and the British/Canadian's.

How did those work out for ya?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2012, 03:51 AM
 
Location: Texas
14,076 posts, read 20,539,575 times
Reputation: 7807
Quote:
Originally Posted by mwruckman View Post
The Admiral is correct you need a big warhead to blow the **** out of a US Super Carrier. If they can't torpedo it or ram it, they have hundreds of Chinese made anti-ship missiles that could turn one of our multibillion dollar babies into a flaming hulk.
Which we'd get to watch live on CNN. Wonder how that would play at home?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2012, 03:58 AM
 
Location: Earth
24,620 posts, read 28,295,951 times
Reputation: 11416
Iran has every right to do whatever it likes in its country or waters.
Period.
If I were them, I'd be sure to arm myself against the US and Israel.

By this logic, anyone can attack the US if they like, because the US can attack them.

Duh, what absurd logic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2012, 04:11 AM
 
13,186 posts, read 14,985,890 times
Reputation: 4555
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy View Post
I wonder what our leader will say to the Admiral who says this is the case. I also wonder what happens when Iran, the nation that has the fastest torpedoes in the world uses them with nuclear warheads. They wouldn't do a thing like using those after the US unilaterally gets rid of all but 300 of their nuclear bombs, would they? I bet Obama thinks the answer is no.


U.S. Naval Commander: Iran Has (http://cowboybyte.com/4289/u-s-naval-commander-iran-has-suicide-boats-outfitted-with-large-warheads/ - broken link)
Since we're fantasizing, I wonder what happens when Iran deploys trained tiger sharks with laser beams strapped to their heads. ......Awesome!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:14 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top