Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
He (Obama) is the duly elected President of the USA by the majority of the voting public, if you don't like or agree with how he runs things you have your opportunity in November to vote in the Candidate of your choice.
In the mean time continuing the birther nonsense just makes your cause look foolish and gives normal people more incentive to re elect President Obama.
As for giving away islands? the ones in question were already in Russian territories,Obama never gave them away but merely acknowledged that they were indeed Russian.
Another rightwing tempest in a teapot.
Is there any sky left to fall?..
Pretty much summarizes it perfectly.
Some nutbag posting his crap on the internet doesn't make it any more valid.....
We let 'em go by letting 'em go. The first permanent settlement on Wrangel was a Soviet one in the late 1920's. Since that era, we have not exerted any control over any of those places, nor claimed the right to do so.
I With that said, former candidate Joe Miller from Alaska has discovered that Obama secretly negotiated new boundary lines between the U.S. and Siberia which would put 7 Alaskan islands which have oil rich shales for thousands of square miles that will soon be considered Russian waters. This move means the president would be letting oil rich sovereign U.S. property be handed over to the Russians, a sworn military adversary for decades. Although this didn't start under Obama, it is still a treasonous move and it is flat out un American if Obama does this. This property has U.S. natural resources on it that insures our national security. With Obama wanting to cut 80% of our 1,550 nuclear deployed weapons and now this treacherous possible move, it is clear that this ineligible non natural born citizen president would be undermining United States sovereignty putting our national security at severe risk. What is America getting in return?
The United States government has never claimed Bennett or the other Islands. In 1994, the Alaska State Supreme Court ruled in D. Denardo v. State of Alaska that the several islands, are not part of Alaska.
Funny, you start blaming Obama, now we are back to Kissinger and the maritime boundary.
So Presidents Ford, Carter, Reagan, H. W. Bush, Clinton, and George W. Bush have all done the same.
Why?
Those islands have never been part of the USA.
Thats why.
If this is allowed to happen under his administration, it will be the action of a man the founders were warned about when framing the presidential clause that was to become Article 2 Section 1. They wanted a future president a natural born Citizen that was born with sole allegiance to the United States, not a President that was born with an allegiance to a foreign sovereignty that would cast doubts about his loyalty to America. How do you ensure sole allegiance to the United States? Both your parents are both U.S. citizens at your birth. As we all know, Obama's birth was governed by the British Nationality Act of 1948 due the the fact that his father was not a U.S. citizen but rather a British Subject making Barack Jr a dual Citizen with split allegiances at birth. With that said, former candidate Joe Miller from Alaska has discovered that Obama secretly negotiated new boundary lines between the U.S. and Siberia which would put 7 Alaskan islands which have oil rich shales for thousands of square miles that will soon be considered Russian waters. This move means the president would be letting oil rich sovereign U.S. property be handed over to the Russians, a sworn military adversary for decades. Although this didn't start under Obama, it is still a treasonous move and it is flat out un American if Obama does this. This property has U.S. natural resources on it that insures our national security. With Obama wanting to cut 80% of our 1,550 nuclear deployed weapons and now this treacherous possible move, it is clear that this ineligible non natural born citizen president would be undermining United States sovereignty putting our national security at severe risk. What is America getting in return?
Why didn't Palin DO something about it...can't she see the islands or is pals with Putin or something??? She sure didn't protect her country very well!!!
Aren't you confused? It sounds like Obama is half Russian....I think he was born on a RUSSIAN island and not an American one
Easy. If you had a education you would have learned that Washington, Jefferson, John Adams and a few others who would become president were grandfathered in as simple Citizens at the time of the adoption of the Constitution until a second generation natural born Citizen was finally able to meet the requirement of the Article 2 Section 1 Clause.
No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States., shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
That does not answer the question about "allegience".
So OP is claiming a person born with dual (two) citizenship is at risk of showing preference to a 3rd country he was not born with allegiance to, but a person born with sole citizenship isn't.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.