Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Mario Apuzzo doesn't know the first thing about Constitutional law. He's a DUI lawyer.
That is not all he is. There you go giving out misinformation. He didn't go to all those law schools just to become a DUI attorney as his educational resume indicates lol.
Kerchner must have been hounding him for weeks and he finally gave in. This should be a laugh riot.
And I hope it goes far enough so the the putz can entertain the court with his two parent citizen theory, only to have them say "No, that's not what Wong Kim Ark Says and No Minor V Happersett isn't precendent"
It's time for the putz to finally test his pet theory , and have it shoved in his face for being 100% historically wrong.
Then there is NO legal theory that would work for birthers.
That is not all he is. There you go giving out misinformation. He didn't go to all those law schools just to become a DUI attorney as his educational resume indicates lol.
And I hope it goes far enough so the the putz can entertain the court with his two parent citizen theory, only to have them say "No, that's not what Wong Kim Ark Says and No Minor V Happersett isn't precendent"
It's time for the putz to finally test his pet theory , and have it shoved in his face for being 100% historically wrong.
Then there is NO legal theory that would work for birthers.
For some reason, he completely chickened out getting involved in the Tisdale appeal which would have directly tested his pet theories.
If he thinks the need to swear to forsake all other allegiances is the indication that someone is not a natural-born citizen, does he (or does the OP) have an explanation for why all naturalized citizens are required to make such an oath, but nobody born in the United States, regardless of parentage, is required to do so?
Mr. Apuzzo will join up with 'Woman of the Year' Attorney Karen Kiefer in the Pennsylvania Ballot Challenge Objection to Barack Obama and put one hell of a serious objection challenging his natural born Citizenship due to his father being a British Subject.
exactly what are they bringing to the argument that wasn't already tried in georgia or indiana?
Quote:
These attorneys aren't amateurs like Taitz who got a internet legal degree.
another birther rejecting orly. she will not be happy about this.
For some reason, whatever intention he had to practice International (not Constitutional) Law failed completely.
His only experience with Constitutional Law resulted in the court threatening to sanction him for filing a frivolous case.
Now you do not know if he has handled a International law case out of his office representing a client or corporate business unless you have total access to his files and client list. Do you concede that or are you saying you had actual access to each case file he has delt with his whole career?
Now you do not know if he has handled a International law case out of his office representing a client or corporate business unless you have total access to his files and client list.
Every case he has ever filed or defended is a matter of public record. I have searched. There are no such cases. They do not exist.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve McGarrett
Do you concede that or are you saying you had actual access to each case file he has delt with his whole career?
As I said, every case he has ever filed or defended is a matter of public record. All you need to do is find one to prove me wrong.
Go for it. I'll wait.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.