Why do people compare same-sex "marriage" to interracial marriage? (v, homosexuals)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The real difference between the two is one is natural and one is not. Call me whatever, but that's just one of life's harsh realities. Taking it up the pooper is not natural, the pooper is made for exit only, it's designed to rid your body of waste, nothing more and nothing less. That's why gays are more likely to have STDs, that's why Aids started in the gay community, that's why most gay men have to have surgeries to repair there poopers if they are sexually active for an extended period of time, and that's why two men or two women can't have children together.
43.5% of heterosexual men and 36% of heterosexual women engage in anal sex.
But why all the focus on sex? Do you automatically think of sex acts everytime you think of heterosexuals too?
I'll ignore the petty, oddly enough homophobic personal attack, and now I will destroy your fantasy with logic.
How does a sexual act which cannot produce children increase the survival of a said species? That is hilarious. Name one species of animals that only participates in gay sex and never straight sex that isn't extinct. Just because dumb animals do it does not make it natural, and does not mean it is not a deviant act. Lots of animals smear poop on themselves, rape each other and eat there own children. Said acts are proven to increase the survival of some of those species. Do you suggest that human beings that like to cover themselves in in feces, eat, rape, and kill children are just doing natural acts and should be released from prison?
The 'fantasy' is that you actually think this nonsense 'argument' is logical.
Your lack of understanding of evolutionary biology is also noted.
Man/woman foundation did not change for IR marriage. It does for gay marriage.
So? I simply was addressing your false claim about how allowing interracial marriage did not "redefine" marriage. It did. It changed the same-race/same-race foundation.
...homosexuality is not natural, why does every animal species on Earth engage in it, ... Sounds pretty dang natural to me.
Validating aberrant sexual behavior by comparing it to deviant animal engagements does not make it normal. You are saying that the homosexual is really no better or any different than an animal because he does the same things that animals do.
Validating aberrant sexual behavior by comparing it to deviant animal engagements does not make it normal. You are saying that the homosexual is really no better or any different than an animal because he does the same things that animals do.
Hahaha. Notice he said it makes in natural - he didn't say it makes it normal or that it makes it correct or moral.
Hahaha. Notice he said it makes in natural - he didn't say it makes it normal or that it makes it correct or moral.
I laugh out loud when homosexuals try to defend and excuse their deviant behavior by comparing themselves to animals. Since the homosexual identifies so enthusiastically and so strongly with animals and emulates animal behavior it isn’t so far fetched when folks get the impression homosexuals wish to include marrying animals in their redefinition of marriage.
The topic on gay unions is hot. Being a controversial issue, many compare gay "marriage" to interracial marriage. Why is that?
Common enemy: "Social Conservatism/Authoritarianism"
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.