Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-18-2012, 10:33 PM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,858,743 times
Reputation: 20030

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
.

Your contention is that the US was the place to "invest" so we raised capital gains taxes holds no credibility, where did you read that. There is no correlation between capital gains from the 1940's to the 1970's, Japan, Germany were also great places to invest. Many economoists would disagree that tax cuts were responsible for economic growth, ask David Stockman. If tax cuts increased growth then what happened the last 10 years.
japan and germany were great places to invest AFTER 1970. from the end of world war two until that time, japan and europe was rebuilding their infrastructure and economies, russia also. remember that these countries were bombed to virtual rubble during the war, including their manufacturing capability. once europe and japan got back to building things, the US had plenty of competition on the world stage, and we still do. from the late 60s through the early 80s, we had plenty of stagflation, and when reagan lowered taxes, including the cap gains tax, once we got past the recession of 1980-1982, our economy took off.

Quote:
The separation between the wealthy and the middle class is at historic highs dating back to the 1930's and it's not about hard working rich nor lazy middle class workers. When you have billionaires and millionaire quoting that same fact you have a problem. From the CEO's of the top companies to the hedge fund mananagers, to the Goldman Sachs traders it has become perfectly clear the disparity is growing in a down economy, and it's not because they work harder than any middle class person.
first off i never said that the middle class workers were lazy, what i said was that they would put in their 40-50 hours per week and go home. the rich on the other hand would put in 100-120 hours per week. for instance, years ago i worked at a four star resort in the grand tetons, and the clientele that stayed there were the rich. they included company presidents, CEOs, company vice presidents, movie stars, movie directors, etc. we are talking the rolls-royce/high end mercedes crowd here. many was the time when, even though they were on vacation, they would come to the office early in the morning(around 4am) and ask to use the phone line so they could get their work done before they went on with their day. one IBM company vice president did this everyday he stayed at the lodge. now if you were on vacation, would YOU do the same thing? the average middle class person wouldnt i can tell you.

we had another client that owned a steel company. he and his wife would stay a total of 8 weeks, and he would come down early to get work done.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Assuming they could actually buy stock in the first place.
anyone can buy stock anytime they want. all they need do is head down to their local stock broker and pony up the cash needed to buy the stock in question. my mother invested in the stock market back in the late 70s, and she was far from being considered rich. it all depends on what you want from life.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-19-2012, 10:18 AM
 
Location: The Land of Reason
13,221 posts, read 12,326,686 times
Reputation: 3554
Quote:
Originally Posted by monkeywrenching View Post
if the company turned a profit, dont you think he deserved his pay?
also, dont mention the price of gas in that equation, as the states and federal goverment get more from a gallon of gas than the company makes on that gallon of gas, and both the state and feds did nothing at all to make that same gallon of gas.

But what about the companies that lose money and file for bankruptcy, but yet the CEOs leave with millions?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2012, 12:24 PM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,949,243 times
Reputation: 12828
Quote:
Originally Posted by simetime View Post
But what about the companies that lose money and file for bankruptcy, but yet the CEOs leave with millions?
What about it? This is a matter for stackholders to address when voting on officer benefits and golden parachute plans. This is yet another reason why the government has no business bailing out any private corporation.

Maybe, just maybe, folks should wise up, invest, look at companies where there are profit sharing programs, "employee owned", etc... .

I think about a friend (union member) who worked 25+ years for utility corporations but whined about the evil corporate structure. Meanwhile he blew his money buying stuff where had he only invested in company stock instead of accumulating worthless/near worthless "stuff" he could have created wealth for himself instead of just spending it.

Life isn't "fair" and Obama's policies won't make life "fair".

Throw out the current tax code in entirety and start over with a system which will not favor anyone groups/wealth bracket.

If you love personal freedom you will despise taxation. The surest way for government to defraud the public from its wealth aside from inflation is to tax in the name of "the public good".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2012, 12:31 PM
 
Location: Los Awesome, CA
8,653 posts, read 6,136,760 times
Reputation: 3368
What are you talking about AeroGuyDC? The buffet tax will increase the rates on higher earners like it should. You can’t increase the top tax rate and increase investment rates at the same time. There’s a certain group of rich people supported by a large amount of the uneducated that will cry class warfare. So changes to the tax system clearly needs to be done in steps.




Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
But yet liberals still push for the Buffet Tax out of "principle."

Yes, they're really that stupid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:43 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top