Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I've worked for 37-1/2 years and have never collected welfare in my life.
His post was in response to my post about how I knew the perp was white before I even read the article. Whites seem to engage in incest and child molestation more than any other way.
(Its just humor on my part,hope I didn't offend anyone. But its true,white instantly came into my mind)
No. The same can be said for heterosexual couples.
The difference is that in cases of incest there is ALMOST ALWAYS an imbalance of power, and coercion.
By trying to link incest, and homosexuality you are making yourself look like a fool. Truth is non related heterosexual couples, and non related homosexual couples are the same.
I answered your question...If you don't like the answer, that's your problem. Once again this is NOT about homosexuals.
That side discussion developed concerning it and my response was directly relevant to the poster I was responding to. Your interjection was ignorant to the discussion we were having and antagonistic in its approach.
If you can't deal with that, then don't step into a conversation you weren't involved in unless you are going to hold the context of it.
In incest cases there is almost always a position of power being used to coerce one party into involvement.
In homosexual couples there is an equal balance of power.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjrose
No. The same can be said for heterosexual couples.
The difference is that in cases of incest there is ALMOST ALWAYS an imbalance of power, and coercion.
By trying to link incest, and homosexuality you are making yourself look like a fool. Truth is non related heterosexual couples, and non related homosexual couples are the same.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nomander
Almost Always now?
Can you provide any support for such a claim?
Do you see any difference between my two posts?
As for the power issue, a parent is always in a position of power over their child. Parents have control of every aspect of their childs life. When they eat, if they eat, what they eat, where they go, when they go, who they see, who they associate with etc...
If you don't understand that you must not have children.
But God Our Holy Father Drew The Line
A Long Time Ago And Called It Sinful
Lust Of The Flesh, And A Deception Of The Devil ! ! !
.
In Leviticus Ch 18, where all the types of incestuous sexual practices are condemned, a father having sex with his daughter is not mentioned at all. I wonder why?
We don't draw any lines anymore. The government decides what is morally acceptable for us and we go from there.
We are creeping towards an anything goes society. Poor young man to have been born to such a sick and disgusting woman. It is so upsetting to see teachers having sex with their young students and it seems more and more women are doing this. When did this start? Or is it the information age and this has been going on for decades? Was it some movie that put this into their sick heads? Do theyt lack a maturity gene? Have to wonder......
His post was in response to my post about how I knew the perp was white before I even read the article. Whites seem to engage in incest and child molestation more than any other way.
(Its just humor on my part,hope I didn't offend anyone. But its true,white instantly came into my mind)
Oh ITA with you because I actually typed the same thing and as usual, it was instantly deleted as an "orphaned" thread. I've noticed that a million negatives thread about Black people are created daily and go on for hundreds of pages.
Getting oral from your mom is not a civil right. This is as disturbing as homosexuality.
Comparing two consenting adults to a mother raping her son? Are you f***ing kidding me? I can't believe how sick and demented heterosexuals in this country are. We should outlaw all heterosexual marriages, and take all the heteros out of our schools.
It may come natural to a very few, but it is not to be encouraged under the pretense that it is normal and acceptable. Mating and procreating is normal and to be encouraged, because family is the foundation of civil society. Family is defined as mother, father in a commited relationship, bearing the fruits of their union, children.
Homosexuality is normal and acceptable.
Mating and procreating by heterosexuals is also normal and doesn't need encouraging.
If a heterosexual family is the foundation of of civil society then it is failing big time with abuse, incest, inter marital affairs etc etc. Approx. half of all heterosexual marriages now end in divorce... not a good advert for heterosexual realtionships.
Who said that a family is defined as Mother and Father bearing the fruits of their union? So what about second marriages where the children aren't the "fruits of their union".... not a Family then?
A happy proper family is one with love and commitment by all in the family whether it is same sex unions or male/female unions........
As for the power issue, a parent is always in a position of power over their child. Parents have control of every aspect of their childs life. When they eat, if they eat, what they eat, where they go, when they go, who they see, who they associate with etc...
If you don't understand that you must not have children.
You are speaking of a "child", I am talking of adults. As for "always" has a position of power, I disagree. There were kids I knew growing up that had no such "parent/child" relationship and the position of "power" was non-existent. There were also some I knew who had a reversed role as the child took on responsibility that the parent lacked.
The problem I have with your argument is it operates using assumptions of extremes (absolute generalizations). There may be a general occurrence to your position, but to claim "always" as you do is unfounded and an invalid premise. There are outliers that conflict with your scenario.
So, it appears that you are attempting to condition the discussion, refusing to accept that point so as to avoid dealing with the conflict of your initial premise concerning consenting adults.
For the sake of clarification, let us say that there is no such hold on the relationship to which you speak, are you then accepting of sexual relations between them? Is your objection the only contingency here or are there other ones to which you are unwilling to point out due to the issues of conflict with your earlier statement?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
