Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-30-2012, 03:03 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,853,731 times
Reputation: 12341

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Roma View Post
I take it that you won't give up your pathetic deflection attempts. Sorry but they fail badly. Here's the study which is linked in the article posted in the OP.

http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/fil...ct_of_ARRA.pdf

What else have you got? That's rhetorical BTW.....
NOW you're talking. I will be sure to read that, and get back with you soon. But looking at the title (Estimated Impact from Jan 2012 to Mar 2012), it sounds amazing to me that we would be talking about 4.1 million jobs in just three months. That makes it even more interesting. Good thing, there are only 9 pages to go thru. Did you? Or, did you take the story-writer's words for it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-30-2012, 03:04 PM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,037,364 times
Reputation: 5455
Yeah I don't know why anybody reports folks anyway. The comedy element deserves a rep point in my eyes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2012, 03:10 PM
 
Location: Massachusetts
10,029 posts, read 8,357,825 times
Reputation: 4212
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
NOW you're talking. I will be sure to read that, and get back with you soon. But looking at the title (Estimated Impact from Jan 2012 to Mar 2012), it sounds amazing to me that we would be talking about 4.1 million jobs in just three months. That makes it even more interesting. Good thing, there are only 9 pages to go thru. Did you? Or, did you take the story-writer's words for it?
Where did anyone outside of you mention 4.1 million jobs?

IBTL
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2012, 03:12 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,853,731 times
Reputation: 12341
Aah, actually that made it a quicker read than I thought initially. So, how did your story-writer come up with 4.1 million jobs lost out of that quarterly report? If anything, this is what the report says (employment related highlighted):

CBO estimates that ARRA’s policies had the following effects in the first quarter of calendar year 2012 compared with what would have occurred otherwise:
1- They raised real (inflation-adjusted) gross domestic product (GDP) by between 0.1 percent and 1.0 percent
2- They lowered the unemployment rate by between 0.1 percentage points and 0.8 percentage points
3- They increased the number of people employed by between 0.2 million and 1.5 million
4- They increased the number of full-time-equivalent jobs by 0.3 million to 1.9 million. (Increases in FTE jobs include shifts from part-time to full-time work or overtime and are thus generally larger than increases in the number of employed workers.)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Roma View Post
Where did anyone outside of you mention 4.1 million jobs?
IBTL
I misread. You used Limbaugh math instead.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2012, 03:14 PM
 
Location: Massachusetts
10,029 posts, read 8,357,825 times
Reputation: 4212
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
Aah, actually that made it a quicker read than I thought initially. So, how did your story-writer come up with 4.1 million jobs lost out of that quarterly report? If anything, this is what the report says (employment related highlighted):

CBO estimates that ARRA’s policies had the following effects in the first quarter of calendar year 2012 compared with what would have occurred otherwise:
1- They raised real (inflation-adjusted) gross domestic product (GDP) by between 0.1 percent and 1.0 percent
2- They lowered the unemployment rate by between 0.1 percentage points and 0.8 percentage points
3- They increased the number of people employed by between 0.2 million and 1.5 million
4- They increased the number of full-time-equivalent jobs by 0.3 million to 1.9 million. (Increases in FTE jobs include shifts from part-time to full-time work or overtime and are thus generally larger than increases in the number of employed workers.)

Quote:
without the stimulus, there would be anywhere from 200,000 to 1.5 million fewer people employed right now? That means the current cost-per-job created is somewhere between $4.1 million and $540,000.

Please feel free to quit while you're behind. Or feel free to keep posting. I enjoy the comedy of the pathetic attempts by the Obama supporters.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2012, 03:15 PM
 
Location: Massachusetts
10,029 posts, read 8,357,825 times
Reputation: 4212
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
Aah, actually that made it a quicker read than I thought initially. So, how did your story-writer come up with 4.1 million jobs lost out of that quarterly report? If anything, this is what the report says (employment related highlighted):

CBO estimates that ARRA’s policies had the following effects in the first quarter of calendar year 2012 compared with what would have occurred otherwise:
1- They raised real (inflation-adjusted) gross domestic product (GDP) by between 0.1 percent and 1.0 percent
2- They lowered the unemployment rate by between 0.1 percentage points and 0.8 percentage points
3- They increased the number of people employed by between 0.2 million and 1.5 million
4- They increased the number of full-time-equivalent jobs by 0.3 million to 1.9 million. (Increases in FTE jobs include shifts from part-time to full-time work or overtime and are thus generally larger than increases in the number of employed workers.)


I misread. You used Limbaugh math instead.

You do understand what a dollar sign looks like- correct??

That would be one of these: $
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2012, 03:15 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,853,731 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Roma View Post
Please feel free to quit while you're behind. Or feel free to keep posting. I enjoy the comedy of the pathetic attempts by the Obama supporters.
Pathetic is to have the need to remind loyal adherents of Limbaugh math.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2012, 03:16 PM
 
Location: Massachusetts
10,029 posts, read 8,357,825 times
Reputation: 4212
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
Aah, actually that made it a quicker read than I thought initially. So, how did your story-writer come up with 4.1 million jobs lost out of that quarterly report? If anything, this is what the report says (employment related highlighted):

CBO estimates that ARRA’s policies had the following effects in the first quarter of calendar year 2012 compared with what would have occurred otherwise:
1- They raised real (inflation-adjusted) gross domestic product (GDP) by between 0.1 percent and 1.0 percent
2- They lowered the unemployment rate by between 0.1 percentage points and 0.8 percentage points
3- They increased the number of people employed by between 0.2 million and 1.5 million
4- They increased the number of full-time-equivalent jobs by 0.3 million to 1.9 million. (Increases in FTE jobs include shifts from part-time to full-time work or overtime and are thus generally larger than increases in the number of employed workers.)


I misread. You used Limbaugh math instead.
^^

Can't blame Bush or invoke the race card so this will do, eh???

Pathetic.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2012, 03:18 PM
 
Location: Massachusetts
10,029 posts, read 8,357,825 times
Reputation: 4212
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
Pathetic is to have the need to remind loyal adherents of Limbaugh math.
OK so now that you've lost the debate here very badly are you all done or can we look forward to more trolling and weak attempts at deflection?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2012, 03:18 PM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,037,364 times
Reputation: 5455
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Roma View Post
You do understand what a dollar sign looks like- correct??

That would be one of these: $
LOL. Don't run em off yet this is too funny.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top