Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-18-2012, 08:46 AM
 
Location: Hinckley Ohio
6,721 posts, read 5,202,822 times
Reputation: 1378

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by NJBest View Post
What's sad about the scenario you painted is that 99 people decided to be 1% as productive as the 1 person.
Sorry, everyone is as productive as that one guy. If fact when you account for the one guy's three hour "power lunches" and afternoon tee times, the 99 actually invest more of their time and produce much more than that one guy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-18-2012, 08:51 AM
 
Location: Hinckley Ohio
6,721 posts, read 5,202,822 times
Reputation: 1378
ok, say the one guy leaves. He doesn't take his income with him. I guess the other 99 could get by with a 100% pay raise.


Enslaved, the wealthy guy, putting thousands away every week is enslaved if he has to pay a tax? You don't see someone spending every dime they make to just survive as being enslaved?
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
The one guy, paying more, realizes he is being "skinned" and is paying everything for everybody else. He leaves the country, or moves his assets out of the country, and the road, sewers, water works ect are never built. The people remaining, being far worse off than before, look for the next "richest" person to skin, thus driving them out as well. It is a communist death spiral. One must ask all the liberals- would you work for free for someone else? Of course not! So why do you ask others to do the same thing? One would have to be insane to "agree" to these wishes.

The liberal fantasy of enslaving someone else to pay for everything is a fantasy. No one in thier right mind will become a slave for the pleasure of others.

Didn't you read Animal Farm in school? The pigs killed Merry, the horse; when the socialists kill the engine of industry, there is no industry, the standard of living declines, then everyone is "happy". Wake up- if socialism was so great, the USSR and North Korea would rule the world.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2012, 08:56 AM
 
Location: Hinckley Ohio
6,721 posts, read 5,202,822 times
Reputation: 1378
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruins_Fan View Post
How it should be...

$0 to $8,700-----------------5%
$8,700 to $35,350------------10%
$35,350 to $85,650-----------15%
$85,650 to $178,650----------20%
$178,650 to $250,000---------30%
$250,000 to $300,000---------35%
$300,000 to $500,000---------40%
$500,000 to $1 mil -----------45%
$1 mil to $3 mil --------------50%
$3 mil to $5 mil --------------55%
$5 mil +-----------------------60%

And I would love to be in the 60% bracket. Would be a wonderful problem to have.
Cannot argue with that, having to pay taxes on $5 million a year would be a great problem to have.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2012, 09:10 AM
 
458 posts, read 616,369 times
Reputation: 362
Quote:
Originally Posted by buzzards27 View Post
Everyone is working just as hard and everyone has the same investment in this example.
Then this example is completely pointless because that is not even remotely similar to how the real world works. Thanks for clearing that up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2012, 09:18 AM
 
640 posts, read 717,786 times
Reputation: 587
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post

The wealthy's tax rate is nearly 5 times that of the middle class. Even those who only pay the 15% capital gains tax rate are still paying 2 to 3 times the rate of the middle class.

Where do liberals/Democrats/lefties get their completely false information on who's NOT paying their fair share? Talking points? That they swallow hook, line, and sinker without question? When will liberals think for themselves and research the actual truth? The information is out there. Stop letting those with an obvious agenda manipulate you. Knowledge is power!

Hint:The bottom 90% of taxpayers are NOT paying their fair share. The top 10% are paying MUCH MORE than their fair share, and the to 1% is paying WAY MORE than even that.
Politicians purposely phrase arguments to encourage class warfare. All of them. It deflects the issue from the fact that spending is completely out of control. I would love an explanation as to how the deficit can expand by a factor of trillions without a single cent being applied to the balance on the national debt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2012, 09:19 AM
 
458 posts, read 616,369 times
Reputation: 362
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruins_Fan View Post
How it should be...

$0 to $8,700-----------------5%
$8,700 to $35,350------------10%
$35,350 to $85,650-----------15%
$85,650 to $178,650----------20%
$178,650 to $250,000---------30%
$250,000 to $300,000---------35%
$300,000 to $500,000---------40%
$500,000 to $1 mil -----------45%
$1 mil to $3 mil --------------50%
$3 mil to $5 mil --------------55%
$5 mil +-----------------------60%

And I would love to be in the 60% bracket. Would be a wonderful problem to have.
When you're taxed 60% at $5 million, you take home ~$2 million. You could also take home ~$2 million by just making $4 million with 55% taxed. That's the problem with your tax brackets - they discourage the pursuit of wealth (which made the USA as great as it... once... was).

Also, your taxes are way higher for everybody than our current real taxes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2012, 09:21 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,791,864 times
Reputation: 24863
I agree with Bruins_Fan. With as low as 5 million comming in I would not care if I had to pay 3 milliion. Even a mere 2 million dollars a year is more than I could eat, drink or screw away without killing myself. The difference between BF, me and buzzard is we do not worship at the Temple of Money and he does. This is not a financial issue it is a religious issue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2012, 09:23 AM
 
458 posts, read 616,369 times
Reputation: 362
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
I agree with Bruins_Fan. With 60 million comming in I would not care if I had to pay 5 milliion or even 50 million. Even a mere 10 million dollars a year is more than I could eat, drink or screw away without killing myself.
The problem is not that you couldn't easily live on $10 million / year, it's that you can still take home $10 million / year by making less money and being taxed less, while contributing less to the economy and government revenue.

You guys should look up the laffer curve.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2012, 09:32 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,791,864 times
Reputation: 24863
Please note I edited my previous post. I wonder what makes anyone thing executives contribute enough to be paid these outrageous amounts. I believe they do not and are using these numbers a chips in the dick is bigger than your dick child hood game. Paying anyone to screw their stockholders out of these salaries is very close to fraud. So, even if the amounts are just chips in a game, these salaries and bonuses should be taxes at 90% plus rate. The game playing strivers would still strive because they are addicted to the striving and the rest of us would benefit by having lower taxes. Like none.

The Laffer Curve makes me laugh because of the complete absurdity of the idea.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2012, 09:49 AM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,488,320 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
. I wonder what makes anyone thing executives contribute enough to be paid these outrageous amounts.
oh so your opinion is that MANAGING, DIRECTING, and LEADING are not contributions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:58 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top