Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-24-2012, 03:12 PM
 
12,282 posts, read 13,241,939 times
Reputation: 4985

Advertisements

CBO says court's healthcare ruling could save $84 billion | Reuters

The non-partisan U.S. Congressional Budget Office said on Tuesday that the Supreme Court ruling that upheld President Barack Obama's healthcare law could save the government some $84 billion over 11 years.

The CBO also said that repealing Obama's healthcare law would increase the deficit over the next decade by $109 billion.

The healthcare reform law aimed to extend medical coverage to more than 30 million uninsured Americans

But only about 3 million of those people will obtain coverage through one of the new insurance exchanges to be set up by 2014 under the law, CBO said, with another 3 million simply becoming uninsured.


THAT WOULD BE 3 MILLION THAT GOT DUMPED BY REPUBLICANS!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-24-2012, 03:16 PM
 
46,289 posts, read 27,108,503 times
Reputation: 11129
Quote:
Originally Posted by Versatile View Post
CBO says court's healthcare ruling could save $84 billion | Reuters

The non-partisan U.S. Congressional Budget Office said on Tuesday that the Supreme Court ruling that upheld President Barack Obama's healthcare law could save the government some $84 billion over 11 years.

The CBO also said that repealing Obama's healthcare law would increase the deficit over the next decade by $109 billion.

The healthcare reform law aimed to extend medical coverage to more than 30 million uninsured Americans

But only about 3 million of those people will obtain coverage through one of the new insurance exchanges to be set up by 2014 under the law, CBO said, with another 3 million simply becoming uninsured.


THAT WOULD BE 3 MILLION THAT GOT DUMPED BY REPUBLICANS!
So, you mean the great plan will NOT cover everyone? I thought that was the whole point?

And, what a few billion when the whole thing is gonna cost 1.6 trillion?

BTW, BS numbers into the CBO means BS numbers coming out....just like this would never go above 900 billion to begin with, right....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2012, 03:22 PM
 
12,905 posts, read 15,662,473 times
Reputation: 9394
OP: Learn the mantra: We only believe the CBO reports when they back a Republican agenda. Just go back to all the previous threads and read. I'm afraid you probably won't get much love here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2012, 03:26 PM
 
14,292 posts, read 9,680,436 times
Reputation: 4254
Quote:
Originally Posted by Versatile View Post
CBO says court's healthcare ruling could save $84 billion | Reuters

The non-partisan U.S. Congressional Budget Office said on Tuesday that the Supreme Court ruling that upheld President Barack Obama's healthcare law could save the government some $84 billion over 11 years.

The CBO also said that repealing Obama's healthcare law would increase the deficit over the next decade by $109 billion.

The healthcare reform law aimed to extend medical coverage to more than 30 million uninsured Americans

But only about 3 million of those people will obtain coverage through one of the new insurance exchanges to be set up by 2014 under the law, CBO said, with another 3 million simply becoming uninsured.


THAT WOULD BE 3 MILLION THAT GOT DUMPED BY REPUBLICANS!
I don't credit the CBO with that much skill, to accurately project the medical costs for over 300 million people over the next eleven years.

Besides, the CBO uses static predictions and assumes everything will go exactly according to the way the Obama admin says it will.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2012, 03:29 PM
 
12,282 posts, read 13,241,939 times
Reputation: 4985
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChristineVA View Post
OP: Learn the mantra: We only believe the CBO reports when they back a Republican agenda. Just go back to all the previous threads and read. I'm afraid you probably won't get much love here.
I signed on here 3 yrs before you. I now my way around and i ain't skeered of no stinkin republicans.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2012, 03:37 PM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,858,215 times
Reputation: 4585
Quote:
Originally Posted by Versatile View Post
CBO says court's healthcare ruling could save $84 billion | Reuters

The non-partisan U.S. Congressional Budget Office said on Tuesday that the Supreme Court ruling that upheld President Barack Obama's healthcare law could save the government some $84 billion over 11 years.

The CBO also said that repealing Obama's healthcare law would increase the deficit over the next decade by $109 billion.

The healthcare reform law aimed to extend medical coverage to more than 30 million uninsured Americans

But only about 3 million of those people will obtain coverage through one of the new insurance exchanges to be set up by 2014 under the law, CBO said, with another 3 million simply becoming uninsured.


THAT WOULD BE 3 MILLION THAT GOT DUMPED BY REPUBLICANS!
Wait a sec! When the Repubs in the House voted and passed repeal ACA bills, what was it 33 of them, shouldn't they have to have had accompanying "pay fors"?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2012, 04:47 PM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,468,904 times
Reputation: 4799
Well that's very propagandist like of you. The CBO report said it would cost you less than previously thought because States have the option not to be forced onto the Medicaid part of ACA.

The cost is still well over $1 trillion for the program.

So you fail for three reasons.

If Obama had had his was ACA would have cost you the $84 billion more that was cited.
Overall the program still cost well over $1 trillion.
You still don't have the money to pay for your current welfare programs.
Quote:
On June 28, 2012, the Supreme Court issued a decision that essentially made the expansion of the Medicaid program under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) a state option. CBO and the staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) have updated their estimates of the budgetary effects of the health insurance coverage provisions of the ACA to take into account the Supreme Court decision.

CBO and JCT now estimate that the insurance coverage provisions of the ACA will have a net cost of $1,168 billion over the 2012–2022 period—compared with $1,252 billion projected in March 2012 for that 11-year period—for a net reduction of $84 billion.
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/43472

You're cheering now for covering less people than you previously thought. I'll save the comments about throwing people out into the street and killing little children and mothers.

I'm not sure why this is so hard to understand.

They're still counting on rosy assumptions for what ACA will achieve and they're also counting, because they can only go by what they're given, on $500 billion being pulled from Medicare.

CBO also put out another report last week.



And what is .0125% of GDP in 2083 based on their rosy assumptions? $16 trillion a year more.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2012, 04:54 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,118,301 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Versatile View Post
CBO said, with another 3 million simply becoming uninsured.
Um. why is it a shock to you that if we insure millions less, that the cost would be less than previously calculated?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2012, 05:00 PM
 
Location: Houston
26,979 posts, read 15,892,870 times
Reputation: 11259
How much are the 3 million uninsured gonna cost us?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2012, 05:12 PM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,170,143 times
Reputation: 21738
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJon3475 View Post
And what is .0125% of GDP in 2083 based on their rosy assumptions? $16 trillion a year more.
Yeah, only $16 TRILLION -- that's the good news. That's hysterical, isn't it?

This whole thing is a freaking Greek Tragedy.

Right there with you....

Mircea
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top