Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-22-2012, 09:38 AM
 
Location: Baltimore
8,299 posts, read 8,603,285 times
Reputation: 3663

Advertisements

I don't get why people don't get longer sentences for this kind of fraud. 18 months and monetary restitution and fines hardly seems to be enough in such a case:

"A wealthy chiropractor and his long-time girlfriend are swapping their $1.2 million waterfront home for prison. The Seattle couple were discovered to be collecting almost $2,000-a-month welfare benefits and even food stamps while living in the luxury property, driving a Jaguar and travelling the world."

Read more: Wealthy couple who live in $1.2m home and drive a Jaguar jailed after claiming $2,000-a-month welfare for eight years | Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-22-2012, 09:44 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,442,711 times
Reputation: 27720
I'd be questioning the people down at the welfare office. I thought they were supposed to be checking to make sure one qualified for welfare benefits.

How did all those bank accounts go undetected by the USG ? Credit card companies can get all the dirt on you with just your SS. Even individuals can get checks done when they rent out their homes to people.

Yet this all flew under the radar of our government for 8 years ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2012, 09:54 AM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,443,387 times
Reputation: 9074
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
I'd be questioning the people down at the welfare office. I thought they were supposed to be checking to make sure one qualified for welfare benefits.

How did all those bank accounts go undetected by the USG ? Credit card companies can get all the dirt on you with just your SS. Even individuals can get checks done when they rent out their homes to people.

Yet this all flew under the radar of our government for 8 years ?

I haven't read the story yet, but I'm guessing that they did check her income and her assets and these were sufficiently low to qualify, and she's not married so his resources weren't checked.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2012, 09:58 AM
 
Location: Texas
14,975 posts, read 16,453,455 times
Reputation: 4586
It costs a lot of money to incarcerate people. This is a non-violent crime. Instead of the 18 months in prison, they really should have been given probation and required to pay back twice the money and volunteer at the food bank or a soup kitchen pretty much every waking hour they're not working for a year or two.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2012, 10:04 AM
 
Location: Pa
20,300 posts, read 22,213,219 times
Reputation: 6553
And yet those on the left will claim that there is no need for verifying who is on welfare and if in fact they have a right to this money. It is a system that is filled with cheats. People working under the table and still collecting etc. How does a family on welfare afford a new car every 2 or 3 years? This day and age every loan requires a ssn to apply. How hard would it be to have a system in place that red flags when ever a welfare recipients SSN is used? We have to regester our cars. How hard would it be to red flag when its a welfare recipient?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2012, 10:05 AM
 
Location: An absurd world.
5,160 posts, read 9,169,019 times
Reputation: 2024
Quote:
Originally Posted by afoigrokerkok View Post
It costs a lot of money to incarcerate people. This is a non-violent crime. Instead of the 18 months in prison, they really should have been given probation and required to pay back twice the money and volunteer at the food bank or a soup kitchen pretty much every waking hour they're not working for a year or two.
This
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2012, 10:21 AM
 
Location: Baltimore
8,299 posts, read 8,603,285 times
Reputation: 3663
Quote:
Originally Posted by afoigrokerkok View Post
It costs a lot of money to incarcerate people. This is a non-violent crime. Instead of the 18 months in prison, they really should have been given probation and required to pay back twice the money and volunteer at the food bank or a soup kitchen pretty much every waking hour they're not working for a year or two.
Can't people with means actually be charged for the expenses related to their incarceration?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2012, 10:26 AM
 
Location: Texas
14,975 posts, read 16,453,455 times
Reputation: 4586
Quote:
Originally Posted by helenejen View Post
Can't people with means actually be charged for the expenses related to their incarceration?
It depends. It would obviously vary from state to state. In some states those sentenced to the county jail for misdemeanors can be, but not those sent to prison for felonies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2012, 10:26 AM
 
Location: Pluto's Home Town
9,982 posts, read 13,755,730 times
Reputation: 5691
This sort of thing is actually fairly common after the housing bubble. We see it here in Oregon. A couple who sold a house in Marin Co California, move north, buy a huge house and have money left over to buy a Range Rover, then realize we don't really need another yoga studio. So, they go into the welfare office in their Ugg boots and apply for food stamps or welfare. It is true that they have little or not income, and they cannot sell their house for anywhere close to what they paid, but their bubble assets are largely intact, and so you have that haves acting like have nots. A disgusting chapter to be sure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2012, 10:28 AM
 
Location: Texas
14,975 posts, read 16,453,455 times
Reputation: 4586
Quote:
Originally Posted by tinman01 View Post
And yet those on the left will claim that there is no need for verifying who is on welfare and if in fact they have a right to this money. It is a system that is filled with cheats. People working under the table and still collecting etc. How does a family on welfare afford a new car every 2 or 3 years? This day and age every loan requires a ssn to apply. How hard would it be to have a system in place that red flags when ever a welfare recipients SSN is used? We have to regester our cars. How hard would it be to red flag when its a welfare recipient?
Here is what I think should happen:

1) All welfare should have to be paid back anyway.

2) If someone is caught cheating the system, they should have to pay back 2-3 times what they received. The extra money should be used to pay for investigators to investigate fraud. They should also have to do volunteer work, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top