Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-02-2012, 10:41 AM
 
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
17,823 posts, read 23,458,697 times
Reputation: 6541

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fundman View Post
OICU812- NDAA is totally different than Bush's enemy combatant claim. NDAA deals with the military detaining combatants captured on foreign soil. NDAA specifically states that its provisions do not "affect existing law or authorities relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States, or any other persons who are captured or arrested in the United States." The Bush Administration argued all the way to the Supreme Court that they had the power of indefinite detention of anyone on U.S. soil, including citizens.
And the Bush administration was correct. The Fifth Amendment states:
"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger;..."
That exception within the Fifth Amendment is the reason why Jose Padilla was held for six years without being charged with a crime, even though he was a US citizen on US soil. Like it or not, as long as Public Law 107-40 remains in effect, the US is in a State of War.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-02-2012, 10:59 AM
 
Location: Florida
33,571 posts, read 18,170,292 times
Reputation: 15551
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffpv View Post
Taken from Dictionary.com, just to clarify:

dictator: 1. a person exercising absolute power, especially a ruler who has absolute, unrestricted control in a government without hereditary succession.
I will tell you when a president ignores the federal laws against illegal immigration and one of our states that belongs to our union, one of our states stands up for that law and the president of our United States sues that state for trying to fulfill that law.. that is a dictator. Plus having the president of Mexico go before OUR congress addressing one of our states that belongs to our United States and that president chastised that state specifically the State of Arizona who just had another border agent shot dead and one wounded, the democrats who are put in office for the AMERICA PEOPLE SPECIFICALLY , to uphold our laws who make the laws, applaud that Mexican president it is WRONG.Obama is no longer OUR president , he is someone who is not looking out for OUR UNITED STATES.


Calderon on AZ Immigration Law Before Congress - YouTube
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-02-2012, 11:06 AM
 
Location: San Diego
990 posts, read 939,717 times
Reputation: 870
You people are all so out in left field that it's sad.
Dictators are not elected and put up for reelection in free and fair elections. Obama was. And Obama will be reelected in one unless a miracle happens for Romney (or an even bigger miracle for my choice Gary Johnson).

The whole "Obama is a dictator" nonsense is cut from the same racist cloth as the "Obama is a Muslim", "Obama is a Terrorist", "Obama didn't really graduate college" and the rest of that BS.

If you people were so concerned with dictatorship, where the F were you during the USA PATRIOT Act nonsense, the post-9/11 removal of rights and the rest of that stuff? Oh yeah, it was a white man doing it, so you were okay with it.

If Obama was a dictator, don't you think he would have just ignored the GOP and just decreed everything? Seriously, you people need help.

Give me a break.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-02-2012, 11:07 AM
 
2,042 posts, read 2,905,307 times
Reputation: 1546
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taratova View Post
I will tell you when a president ignores the federal laws against illegal immigration and one of our states that belongs to our union, one of our states stands up for that law and the president of our United States sues that state for trying to fulfill that law.. that is a dictator. Plus having the president of Mexico go before OUR congress addressing one of our states that belongs to our United States and that president chastised that state specifically the State of Arizona who just had another border agent shot dead and one wounded, the democrats who are put in office for the AMERICA PEOPLE SPECIFICALLY , to uphold our laws who make the laws, applaud that Mexican president it is WRONG.Obama is no longer OUR president , he is someone who is not looking out for OUR UNITED STATES.


Calderon on AZ Immigration Law Before Congress - YouTube
Despite your gratuitous emphasis, I don't see how what you've written makes him a dictator. This is not a thread about what actions he's taken that you agree or disagree with.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-02-2012, 11:14 AM
 
Location: Florida
33,571 posts, read 18,170,292 times
Reputation: 15551
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffpv View Post
Despite your gratuitous emphasis, I don't see how what you've written makes him a dictator. This is not a thread about what actions he's taken that you agree or disagree with.
Obama is sworn in as OUR PRESIDENT.. he is to serve us , NOT MEXICO or the ILLEGALS.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-02-2012, 11:17 AM
 
2,042 posts, read 2,905,307 times
Reputation: 1546
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taratova View Post
Obama is sworn in as OUR PRESIDENT.. he is to serve us , NOT MEXICO or the ILLEGALS.
Be that as it may, how does your presumed kow-towing to Mexicans make him a dictator? I mean, by the actual meaning of the word?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-02-2012, 11:26 AM
 
Location: Florida
33,571 posts, read 18,170,292 times
Reputation: 15551
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffpv View Post
Be that as it may, how does your presumed kow-towing to Mexicans make him a dictator? I mean, by the actual meaning of the word?
That is only one thing Obama has done to become the dictator in chief.. his mandate is a dictate to the people to buy a service which is against our Constitution..

I also believe that Obama is such a dictator I would not put it past him to pick the most timid of the justices.. Justice Roberts to strong arm him to change his mind on the mandate. Justice Roberts own writings tell of a man who was against Obamacare as a mandate only to change his writings with an absurd ruling calling it a tax.

Obama will get his agenda done whether the people want it or not.. It is Obama Nation or nothing. Even the socialist supporting media is pushing Obama on the people.. little do they know what will happen in 2014 when the mandate will be implemented. More monies poured into healthcare, more in the gas tank, more on the food bill and the economy will die a slow death.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-02-2012, 11:29 AM
 
2,042 posts, read 2,905,307 times
Reputation: 1546
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taratova View Post
That is only one thing Obama has done to become the dictator in chief.. his mandate is a dictate to the people to buy a service which is against our Constitution..

I also believe that Obama is such a dictator I would not put it past him to pick the most timid of the justices.. Justice Roberts to strong arm him to change his mind on the mandate. Justice Roberts own writings tell of a man who was against Obamacare as a mandate only to change his writings with an absurd ruling calling it a tax.

Obama will get his agenda done whether the people want it or not.. It is Obama Nation or nothing. Even the socialist supporting media is pushing Obama on the people.. little do they know what will happen in 2014 when the mandate will be implemented. More monies poured into healthcare, more in the gas tank, more on the food bill and the economy will die a slow death.
Ok, now I think we've slipped into the realm of right-wing conspiracy. I thought you had actual examples. Silly me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-02-2012, 01:34 PM
 
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
17,823 posts, read 23,458,697 times
Reputation: 6541
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThinkBeforeYouVote View Post
You people are all so out in left field that it's sad.
Dictators are not elected and put up for reelection in free and fair elections. Obama was. And Obama will be reelected in one unless a miracle happens for Romney (or an even bigger miracle for my choice Gary Johnson).

The whole "Obama is a dictator" nonsense is cut from the same racist cloth as the "Obama is a Muslim", "Obama is a Terrorist", "Obama didn't really graduate college" and the rest of that BS.
Nobody elected Obama to create new laws by decree. That is the job of Congress, not Presidents.

Obama was elected to abide by the US Constitution, not to do whatever he pleased.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThinkBeforeYouVote View Post
If you people were so concerned with dictatorship, where the F were you during the USA PATRIOT Act nonsense, the post-9/11 removal of rights and the rest of that stuff? Oh yeah, it was a white man doing it, so you were okay with it.
I supported the USAPATRIOT Act, and still do. First, it is an act passed by a bipartisan Congress, not a law created by a President. Second, there is nothing unconstitutional with the USAPATRIOT Act.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThinkBeforeYouVote View Post
If Obama was a dictator, don't you think he would have just ignored the GOP and just decreed everything? Seriously, you people need help.

Give me a break.
What do you think he has been doing? Obama has completely ignored Congress (Democrats and Republicans alike) and the courts. You communists may enjoy living under a distatorship, but free people do not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-02-2012, 01:54 PM
 
Location: Texas
1,187 posts, read 995,695 times
Reputation: 593
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fundman View Post
Bush and Cheney tried to institute a policy which would have allowed the President to designate U.S. citizens as "enemy combatants" without any justification or accountability, imprison them indefinitely without charging them with a crime, or even allow them access to a lawyer. That is the very definition of a dictator.
Soooo... since Obama ACTUALLY signed it into law, that makes him ACTUALLY a dictator, where as Bush and Cheney just wanted to be one?

President Obama Signed the National Defense Authorization Act - Now What? - Forbes
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:35 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top