Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Like drones are not there to kill people...less than 24 hours after winning re election Obama was back to using drones to murder people in Yemen. You act like the US is innocent and Iran is the bad person...the US government is the one slaughtering civilians in Pakistan,Yemen among other places with drones.
Why should we be debriefed on every single skirmish or incident that occurs somewhere in the world? What if we are testing their radar and weapons capabilities? How would a radar detecting a drone know if it was armed or not? What if Iran intentionally missed the drone as a show of force? There are a million questions that you should consider before jumping to conclusions.
You have to understand the relatively limited space in the area. Space is fairly confined so the difference between international air space and Iran’s is very slim. It's not like sitting in the middle of the ocean with no land in sight.
LOL So this is what transparency looks like. Another four years of "transparency". How convenient that this was kept quiet until after the election. Not that it would have changed things but you never know.
And of course, I expect we did nothing in response. Not asking for war, but to allow Iran to do this and do nothing? Weak.
I'll give this one to the POTUS. We really should have taken the SU-25s out. Too bad the Predators weren't armed with AAMs.
"two Iranian SU-25–old Russian fighter jets the Iranians operate–flew out in to the Persian Gulf into international air space and fired on a U.S. Air Force predator drone, an unmanned drone in international air space, that the Pentagon insists was conducting routine, although classified, maritime surveillance. The Iranian aircraft fired continuously; they did not hit the drone; the drone was able to return to base in that region."
Epic Fail . 1 defenseless drone can't be taken out by not one but 2 SU-25 Jets.
I'll give this one to the POTUS. We really should have taken the SU-25s out. Too bad the Predators weren't armed with AAMs.
"two Iranian SU-25–old Russian fighter jets the Iranians operate–flew out in to the Persian Gulf into international air space and fired on a U.S. Air Force predator drone, an unmanned drone in international air space, that the Pentagon insists was conducting routine, although classified, maritime surveillance. The Iranian aircraft fired continuously; they did not hit the drone; the drone was able to return to base in that region."
Epic Fail . 1 defenseless drone can't be taken out by not one but 2 SU-25 Jets.
LOL So this is what transparency looks like. Another four years of "transparency". How convenient that this was kept quiet until after the election. Not that it would have changed things but you never know.
And of course, I expect we did nothing in response. Not asking for war, but to allow Iran to do this and do nothing? Weak.
Since 0bama did not bring this up during the campaign, it can only mean that the facts surrounding this do make him look like a great C-in-C.
LOL So this is what transparency looks like. Another four years of "transparency". How convenient that this was kept quiet until after the election. Not that it would have changed things but you never know.
And of course, I expect we did nothing in response. Not asking for war, but to allow Iran to do this and do nothing? Weak.
What's the something you want us to do? Shoot at, and miss, one of their air assets?
[what are we - a bunch kids?]
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.