Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-07-2012, 09:24 AM
 
753 posts, read 728,180 times
Reputation: 440

Advertisements

Reminds me of this:
House Passes Ryan Budget After Dem Voting Maneuver Nearly Leads to Alternative - Fox News

In April 2011, House Republicans introduced a budget with spending cuts far more severe than the Ryan budget. The GOP knew moderate Republicans and Democrats wouldn't vote for it, but they wanted to give conservative Republicans the chance to vote for it so they could go back to their base constituents and say "See? I tried!". At the same time, since it would fail, the GOP would not be harmed in general elections by passing a proposal for severe budget cuts.

But Democrats voted "present", rather than "no".

Alarmed, the GOP suddenly realized their proposal was going to pass. So one after another, House Republicans who had voted "yes" changed their votes to "no".

All to assure that their own bill would fail.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-07-2012, 09:27 AM
 
13,694 posts, read 9,011,664 times
Reputation: 10410
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mictlantecuhtli View Post
Reminds me of this:
House Passes Ryan Budget After Dem Voting Maneuver Nearly Leads to Alternative - Fox News

In April 2011, House Republicans introduced a budget with spending cuts far more severe than the Ryan budget. The GOP knew moderate Republicans and Democrats wouldn't vote for it, but they wanted to give conservative Republicans the chance to vote for it so they could go back to their base constituents and say "See? I tried!". At the same time, since it would fail, the GOP would not be harmed in general elections by passing a proposal for severe budget cuts.

But Democrats voted "present", rather than "no".

Alarmed, the GOP suddenly realized their proposal was going to pass. So one after another, House Republicans who had voted "yes" changed their votes to "no".

All to assure that their own bill would fail.

Thanks for recalling that to memory! I believe there was a video of that session.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2012, 09:41 AM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
9,701 posts, read 5,113,905 times
Reputation: 4270
We're going to look back on these last few years as one of the most embarrassing displays of governance by Republicans. It'll be up there w/ the McCarthy era witch hunts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2012, 10:32 AM
 
Location: 500 miles from home
33,942 posts, read 22,532,112 times
Reputation: 25816
That would be humiliating. Poor old Mitch. Things just aren't going his way this week.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2012, 11:03 AM
 
Location: Home, Home on the Front Range
25,826 posts, read 20,706,970 times
Reputation: 14818
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mictlantecuhtli View Post
Reminds me of this:
House Passes Ryan Budget After Dem Voting Maneuver Nearly Leads to Alternative - Fox News

In April 2011, House Republicans introduced a budget with spending cuts far more severe than the Ryan budget. The GOP knew moderate Republicans and Democrats wouldn't vote for it, but they wanted to give conservative Republicans the chance to vote for it so they could go back to their base constituents and say "See? I tried!". At the same time, since it would fail, the GOP would not be harmed in general elections by passing a proposal for severe budget cuts.

But Democrats voted "present", rather than "no".

Alarmed, the GOP suddenly realized their proposal was going to pass. So one after another, House Republicans who had voted "yes" changed their votes to "no".

All to assure that their own bill would fail.
Another excellent example of their posturing. And of course, they then try to sell the BS that it the Dems who aren't serious.

Idiots.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2012, 11:04 AM
 
Location: Home, Home on the Front Range
25,826 posts, read 20,706,970 times
Reputation: 14818
Quote:
Originally Posted by EddieB.Good View Post
We're going to look back on these last few years as one of the most embarrassing displays of governance by Republicans. It'll be up there w/ the McCarthy era witch hunts.
Yep.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2012, 01:31 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,296 posts, read 26,217,746 times
Reputation: 15646
I know this is old but the look on Claire McCaskills face when Mcconnell objected to his own motion is priceless.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2012, 01:49 PM
 
Location: The Brat Stop
8,347 posts, read 7,242,601 times
Reputation: 2279
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidkaos2 View Post
What I find as idiocy is Reid having the nerve to chastise McConnell for not taking his job seriously while Reid has not allowed a budget for the nation to be voted on in over 3 years, used Senate time to speechify about Romney not paying his taxes but refued to produce any evidence whatsoever to support his claim, and tried to defend government funding during a crushing recession for cowboy poetry. That's some pretty bald faced hypocrisy there.
Off topic rant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2012, 01:51 PM
 
Location: The Brat Stop
8,347 posts, read 7,242,601 times
Reputation: 2279
Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerLily24 View Post
Another excellent example of their posturing. And of course, they then try to sell the BS that it the Dems who aren't serious.

Idiots.
It's actually posterior-ing, ain't it? I think their arses are showing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2012, 01:55 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,187,290 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigHouse9 View Post
The Senate Democrats have no shame so they cannot be embarassed, but thanks for playing.
Neither does McConnell who clearly watched his own poop bill explode in his face and had to filibuster it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:44 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top