Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-10-2012, 08:23 PM
 
15,171 posts, read 8,687,397 times
Reputation: 7498

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by alphamale View Post
I certainly hope that you aren't teaching the constitution.
Or history ... bwuhahahahaha
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-10-2012, 08:29 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,111,207 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by GuyNTexas View Post
You were freaking robbed again.
Says the President for Life of Jewelers for 9/11 Truth, a guy who thinks that thermic lances have something to do with thermite, and who believes that jewelers have magical skills that allow them to do metallurgical studies just by looking at pretty pictures.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2012, 08:30 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,111,207 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by alphamale View Post
I certainly hope that you aren't teaching the constitution.
I could... but no. I do teach economics though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2012, 09:18 PM
 
Location: Houston
26,979 posts, read 15,934,160 times
Reputation: 11259
Quote:
James Madison is the acknowledged father of the constitution. In 1794, when Congress appropriated $15,000 for relief of French refugees who fled from insurrection in San Domingo to Baltimore and Philadelphia. James Madison wrote disapprovingly, "I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents." Today, at least two-thirds of a $2.5 trillion federal budget is spent on the “objects of benevolence.” That includes Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, aid to higher education, farm and business subsidies, welfare, ad nauseam.
Dr. Walter Williams
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2012, 10:06 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,111,207 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by whogo View Post
Dr. Walter Williams
The Constitution was not the child of a single man.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2012, 12:11 AM
 
15,171 posts, read 8,687,397 times
Reputation: 7498
Quote:
Originally Posted by HistorianDude View Post
The Constitution was not the child of a single man.
So now you know more about the constitution than James Madison, one of it's most influential drafters?

Sometimes it's just best to say nothing when this is the only silliness you have to offer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2012, 12:14 AM
 
15,171 posts, read 8,687,397 times
Reputation: 7498
Quote:
Originally Posted by HistorianDude View Post
I could... but no. I do teach economics though.
Sure you could. And I'm guessing you could teach Tesla a thing or two about inventing ... maybe give Gen MacArthur a lesson in war strategy ... show Chuck Yeager really how to test out jets?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2012, 12:21 AM
 
113 posts, read 101,659 times
Reputation: 51
So...the reasoning why taxation is not theft is because of a document written hundreds of years ago, which I never agreed to. A document which permitted slavery to exist? That's not a great argument.

And it isn't just limited to being theft if you are paying for another group's income.

Let's say a group of people, like the mob, forces me to pay them money for "protection" under the threat of physical harm. I would think that most people would disagree with that.

Now, let's say there was a group of 30 people living in a neighborhood somewhere. Let's say they vote, and the majority "yes" vote forces everyone, including the minority "no" vote to pay a security officer part time for "protection." Most people would still think that was wrong.

If that's wrong, then just making the group of people larger doesn't make it right. And the gov't uses the threat of physical harm. What does the gov't use to force income tax evaders to go to prison?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2012, 12:25 AM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
9,701 posts, read 5,128,417 times
Reputation: 4270
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pretzelogik View Post
Not everything the gument does or has done is morally or legally just. A la the internment of Japanese Americans in WWII. Just because special interests and lobbyist have concocted a tax monstrosity ... How Long is the US Tax Code? ... does not make it right or just. To put it in colloquial terms "it ain't their money".
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
the constitution authorized slavery too...doesnt mean its right

the constitution stated that senators were appointed by the state

the constitution states that only men (males) have the right to vote

the constitution states that taxes would be EVEN among the population...not a ''regressive so-called progressive income tax"

the constitution authorizes manditory conscription (draft)

the constitution states ANY THING NOT MENTIONED IN THE FIRST NINE AMENBDMENTS is UP TO THE STATES


do you really want to pay with words...eddie???

So how exactly are we supposed to fund building roads?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2012, 03:13 AM
 
Location: Prepperland
19,031 posts, read 14,266,154 times
Reputation: 16774
The confusion may be eased by this:
Pursuant to the Declaration of Independence, Job #1 = secure rights, and Job #2 = govern those who consent. If consent was not granted, then the government was still obligated to help secure rights - via prosecuting deliberate injury and adjudicating disputes of accidental injury. This does not require much in the way of funding.

As to taxation, governments instituted to secure rights have no power to tax rights. All they may tax are privileges. So, the obvious question is : what revenue taxable privileges did the taxpayer consent to for there to be a tax levy?

If consent was granted, no "theft" is involved. If consent was not granted, investigate which privilege is behind the levy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:15 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top