Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Lots of truth on Russia Times, I am sure. One would have to wonder why you take that source as the best one around. Do you know how to get on the American Communist site, too?
A strong and respectable person should take this post. Someone straight forward that thinks for themselves and is not policy driven. An independent secretary of state....
Independent? The President is responsible for international relations and the Department of State is an executive department that supports that role. The Secretary of State is appointed not elected. Condi Rice did her job supporting Bush's policies - and lying for him.
Independent? The President is responsible for international relations and the Department of State is an executive department that supports that role. The Secretary of State is appointed not elected. Condi Rice did her job supporting Bush's policies - and lying for him.
Do you have any idea why it wasn't Hillary who did the talking that fateful Sunday morning? Why did they use a woman who was our ambassador to the UN when the Secretary of State would have been the likely one. I wonder if she refused to lie for them that morning.
Independent? The President is responsible for international relations and the Department of State is an executive department that supports that role. The Secretary of State is appointed not elected. Condi Rice did her job supporting Bush's policies - and lying for him.
You are wrong. The SoS is nominated. The Senate then approves or rejects via VOTE. The prez does not appoint SoS.
Do you have any idea why it wasn't Hillary who did the talking that fateful Sunday morning? Why did they use a woman who was our ambassador to the UN when the Secretary of State would have been the likely one. I wonder if she refused to lie for them that morning.
Hillary wasn't available for a round of Sunday morning talk shows - she was a little bit busy.
When will out administration be reporting what they have found out about those 4 people? Do they know anything more than the lies they fed Rice. Why in hell did they pick someone like her to tell their story, anyway? Why not Carney or Clinton?
If you'd bothered to watch one of the many reruns of her news conference today where she withdrew her name, you'd know the answer to that question. I'd tell you ow but I seriously doubt you even care what the answer is...you've already decided not to believe it.
Status:
"everybody getting reported now.."
(set 24 days ago)
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,558 posts, read 16,548,014 times
Reputation: 6041
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy
Lots of truth on Russia Times, I am sure. One would have to wonder why you take that source as the best one around. Do you know how to get on the American Communist site, too?
i simply googled it and got the first one, Does it really matter where it comes from when the site itself uses direct quotes from the chairman of the Congressional committee ????
Status:
"everybody getting reported now.."
(set 24 days ago)
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,558 posts, read 16,548,014 times
Reputation: 6041
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale Cooper
You are wrong. The SoS is nominated. The Senate then approves or rejects via VOTE. The prez does not appoint SoS.
um, yes that is what appointing is. the vote is not done by the people, but by elected officials. So yes, the President does APPOINT his NOMINEE, and the senate can CONFIRM them or not
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.