Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Celebrating Memorial Day!
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-20-2013, 03:52 PM
 
4,684 posts, read 4,574,213 times
Reputation: 1588

Advertisements

Given that the president is a surrogate king, 11 armed guards is nothing - it's not too difficult to imagine an alternate course of history which would have entitled the president's children to an escort of Household Cavalry and the formal address "Your Highness".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-20-2013, 04:06 PM
 
Location: Yucaipa, California
9,894 posts, read 22,027,890 times
Reputation: 6853
This bill also gives obama secret service protection for life.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2013, 04:09 PM
 
Location: southern california
61,288 posts, read 87,431,754 times
Reputation: 55562
protecting the president and his family comes with the job. 48% of americans clearly do not want his readership or his version of change.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2013, 04:15 PM
 
6,802 posts, read 6,716,541 times
Reputation: 1911
Quote:
Originally Posted by steel7 View Post
This bill also gives obama secret service protection for life.
Yes. And all future presidents. /shrug
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2013, 04:25 PM
 
Location: West Michigan
12,372 posts, read 9,314,559 times
Reputation: 7364
Quote:
Originally Posted by squarian View Post
Given that the president is a surrogate king, 11 armed guards is nothing - it's not too difficult to imagine an alternate course of history which would have entitled the president's children to an escort of Household Cavalry and the formal address "Your Highness".
What are you smoking?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2013, 04:42 PM
 
270 posts, read 260,415 times
Reputation: 167
Quote:
Originally Posted by mimimomx3 View Post
Honestly, I can't see how the President can advocate AGAINST armed guards in public schools when his own daughters are protected this way. He's not a stupid man, so my only conclusion is that he's an elitist and a hypocrite. Shameful.
An elitist is someone who perceives he has special rights. The president of the US does in fact have special rights.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2013, 05:26 PM
 
Location: in a pond with the other human scum
2,361 posts, read 2,538,277 times
Reputation: 2808
Quote:
Originally Posted by ellemint View Post
Yes. They're just like all the other kids don't ya know ?
No, they're not. They get Secret Service protection by federal law. 18 USC 3056. Look it up. Don't like it? Ask your congressman to change the law. I'm sure that will be popular with the majority of voters who elected their father President. Twice.

Enjoy the inauguration festivities tomorrow.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2013, 06:46 PM
 
8,231 posts, read 17,321,103 times
Reputation: 3696
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
SEE:4 Pinocchios for a slashing NRA ad on security at Sidwell Friends School - The Washington Post

Note the article clearly states: " And Ellis Turner, associate head of Sidwell Friends, told us emphatically: “Sidwell Friends security officers do not carry guns.” (Note: this includes those listed as special police officers.)"

I guess we should take this thread as just another refusal by the whiny righties to let facts interefere with their pissant little whines, eh?
Sure, I believe that....I don't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2013, 06:48 PM
 
8,231 posts, read 17,321,103 times
Reputation: 3696
Quote:
Originally Posted by cyrano View Post
So, let me get this straight...now the outrage is over Sasha and Malia getting Secret Service protection?
Read the thread. I don't have a problem with their secret service protection. Not at all. Nor do I have a problem with Sidwell having security guards. Not at all. My problem is the President's hypocrisy speaking out against all schools having security.....while his kid's school DOES- and I'm not talking about the Secret Service protection.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2013, 06:54 PM
 
Location: Sacramento, Ca.
2,440 posts, read 3,431,950 times
Reputation: 2629
Is this thread about school security, or a Liberals vs. Repubs bashing match? Is it trying to say that Obama is being elitist, and if so are we to believe that he is first Highest Official in the country to ever garner special treatment, as if that should not accompany his CIC status?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top