Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-06-2013, 10:50 PM
 
Location: Formerly Pleasanton Ca, now in Marietta Ga
10,351 posts, read 8,569,440 times
Reputation: 16693

Advertisements

It seems many politicians are jumping on the bandwagon by coming up with all kinds of things in an effort to make themselves look good. While some have honest intentions, I think some are just trying to earn brownie points by whatever looks like the flavor of the month.
To buy ammo you must take anger management classes. This is just plain silly

Florida bill would require anger management courses for bullet buyers | Fox News


"The bill filed Saturday by state Sen. Audrey Gibson, D-Jacksonville, would require a three-day waiting period for the sale of any firearm and the sale of ammunition to anyone who has not completed anger management courses. The proposal would require ammo buyers to take the anger management courses every 10 years."

How do we elect people like this?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-06-2013, 10:53 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
12,287 posts, read 9,820,687 times
Reputation: 6509
More feel good nonsense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2013, 11:06 PM
 
Location: San Francisco, CA
15,088 posts, read 13,449,172 times
Reputation: 14266
That is nonsense. Properly implemented universal background checks, on the other hand, are common sense. And they're done by most other well-off countries, including ones with lots of gun owners, like Switzerland.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2013, 11:16 PM
 
Location: Tyler, TX
23,862 posts, read 24,111,507 times
Reputation: 15135
Quote:
Originally Posted by ambient View Post
Properly implemented universal background checks, on the other hand, are common sense.
Universal background checks discriminate against poor people. Why should their rights be denied, simply because they're not people of means?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2013, 11:21 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
12,287 posts, read 9,820,687 times
Reputation: 6509
Quote:
Originally Posted by swagger View Post
Universal background checks discriminate against poor people. Why should their rights be denied, simply because they're not people of means?
Plus most crime guns come from straw purchasers or are stollen, universal background checks won't reduce crime.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2013, 11:49 PM
 
Location: San Francisco, CA
15,088 posts, read 13,449,172 times
Reputation: 14266
Quote:
Originally Posted by swagger View Post
Universal background checks discriminate against poor people. Why should their rights be denied, simply because they're not people of means?
And how exactly is that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2013, 02:09 AM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,045,587 times
Reputation: 17864
Quote:
Originally Posted by ambient View Post
And how exactly is that?
You'd agree then that voter ID is not discriminatory?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2013, 03:03 AM
 
Location: texas
9,127 posts, read 7,942,406 times
Reputation: 2385
Not that Im in favor of this lunatic proposal, but got me wondering...Why don't folk complain about taking a conceal carry course? Isn't that a government mandated restriction on gun ownership?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2013, 03:18 AM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,045,587 times
Reputation: 17864
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chimuelojones View Post
Not that Im in favor of this lunatic proposal, but got me wondering...Why don't folk complain about taking a conceal carry course? Isn't that a government mandated restriction on gun ownership?
Those laws will vary by state, here in PA a concealed carry permit is issued by the Sheriff. There are no requirements except you be 21 and can legally own a firearm. These are usually issued immediately after the background check at least in my County.

Quote:
http://www.portal.state.pa.us/portal...rmation/462424
The sheriff has 45 days to conduct an investigation to determine an individual's eligibility to be issued a license. Included in the investigation is a background check conducted on the individual through the Pennsylvania Instant Check System (PICS) to determine if the records indicate the individual is prohibited by law. In accordance with 18 PA C.S. §6109, a sheriff may deny an individual the right to a License to Carry Firearms if there is reason to believe that the character and reputation of the individual are such that they would be likely to act in a manner dangerous to public safety.

If the PICS check is approved and the subject is of good character, the sheriff may issue a License to Carry Firearms. The issuance of a License to Carry Firearms allows individuals to carry a firearm concealed on or about their person, or in a vehicle throughout this Commonwealth. The license is valid for a period of five (5) years unless sooner revoked.
A lot of people get these just to avoid the issues of transporting a weapon in a vehicle. If you don't have a concealed permit it has to be unloaded, bullets inaccessible etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2013, 04:46 AM
 
Location: 77441
3,160 posts, read 4,366,471 times
Reputation: 2314
Quote:
Originally Posted by swagger View Post
Universal background checks discriminate against poor people. Why should their rights be denied, simply because they're not people of means?


its the 2013 equivelant of a poll tax.
Colorado in their frenzy to destroy the Constitution, was trying to come up w/a fee to be passed on to the gun buyer for the background check.

no fee = no gun.

= poll tax.

poll tax was determined to be a burdon on poor people.

poll tax = racist.

racism = democrats best friend.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top