Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-29-2013, 09:56 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,686,185 times
Reputation: 27720

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Winter_Sucks View Post
In a way. I don't see the new standards as much of a change. It's pretty much just focusing more on going in depth with material. Our old standards were a mile wide and inch deep, now it's less wide and more deep.
I guess it depends on the subject area. I'm in Math and not memorizing multiplication tables in elementary is effecting students in middle school when it comes time to work with fractions and GCF and LCD. Same with formulas and at that level there aren't many formulas to memorize..area and perimeter are two examples. They need their charts to do that simple problem.

Come college though the crutches are gone..no charts of formulas and no dependence on calculators.
And that is one reason you see a rise in the need for remedial classes by US college freshman.
Very few foreign college students need remedial classes to get them up to college level ability.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-29-2013, 10:01 AM
 
6,500 posts, read 6,054,014 times
Reputation: 3603
One of a few concerns is privacy. I dont see the group behind this and people pushing it being very upfront about this. There is more to it than simply changing standards. And it seems the Federal Government is yet again getting involves where it shouldnt
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-29-2013, 10:18 AM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,629,434 times
Reputation: 24780
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
It's too late. States that got waivers from NCLB requirements have to move to RTT with Common Core.
It was a strong arm movement. NCLB requires 100% pass next year and no state in the nation is anywhere near that 100%.

And none of them want to lose their Fed money. Even Texas, as anti DC as they are, put in for a waiver.

Sadly there's no much to be done about this. The US went from #18 in Math (2000) to #31 in Math (2009) world wide. NCLB and new curriculum standards came into effect in 2000.

Once RTT is in place for a few years people we'll see that we're going from bad to worse.

NCLB and Common Core are perfect examples of bureaucrats with little or no teaching experience micromanaging America's education establishment into the ground. They can easily convince legislators who know next to nothing about education to buy into their silliness, and this is exactly what's happened.

A dozen years after NCLB, is anyone ready to claim that it's improved anything?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-29-2013, 10:21 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,686,185 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Gringo View Post
NCLB and Common Core are perfect examples of bureaucrats with little or no teaching experience micromanaging America's education establishment into the ground. They can easily convince legislators who know next to nothing about education to buy into their silliness, and this is exactly what's happened.

A dozen years after NCLB, is anyone ready to claim that it's improved anything?
NCLB is not even acknowledged by Congress who passed it to begin with and were begged by schools around the county to modify it. I will say though that NCLB mandates did get states to move over to RTT with no arguments. No one wants their Federal dollars cut..no one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-29-2013, 10:23 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,686,185 times
Reputation: 27720
As far as data goes, NCLB mandated a lot of demographic data as well but didn't mandate it be published to the general public.
The data can be found for each state. RTT just mandates that the data be made more public.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:18 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top