Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Globalism ate away at American production over the years.
Change doesn't come overnight but it does come.
One day you turn around and ask "What happened ? I didn't see it happening."
Incrementalism people.
We went from a producer to a consumer. Consumers don't make anything.
We buy and fix stuff. To keep that going the "stuff" has to be limited in duration so you keep buying it.
You used to be able to buy an appliance and have it last 20+ years. Today, you're lucky if it hasn't been serviced in the past 3 years and the parts/service cost almost as much as the appliance itself.
Sure, blame people, people of the opposite party for causing what you see today.
It won't do any good except to soothe your ego.
Just follow what the current administration tells us..FORWARD.
However, Japan won't let Toyota fail. They'd never let Honda fail. Hell, they'd never let any of their huge manufacturers fail.
Ditto Germany or France...or S. Korea. You think they'd let Hyundai fail? Hell no.
So long as our competitors will save their auto manufacturers, we should save ours. Hell, we're already paying for the defense of those nations as it is. No wonder they can afford to subsidize their corporations.
Failed policies in one area does not justify failed policies in another. Yes, we should not be paying to protect Japan, etc. Those bases should be a PROFIT center, not a COST center. Or else close them.
But bailing out GM did not save our auto industry. If they had gone bankrupt, a new company would have formed out of the GM assets but without the pension baggage.
If a company is too big to fail, it's too big to exist.
I think it was the Conservative adoption and raising the ugly head of the Supply Side Economic Theory that has proven to be such a failure, yet still championed by the blind of the Right.
I look at this as a catch 22. If we had not bailed the automobile companies out, unemployment rates would have gone up into the 30% range. The bailout kept the unemployment rates from skyrocketing to record levels..
No, it did not.
And there is no evidence that unemployment rates would have gone up without a bail out. Companies get bought or merge when bankrupt. Look at the airlines. Look at Hostess cupcakes. Bankruptcy does not mean all the employees lose their jobs.
But bailing out GM did not save our auto industry. If they had gone bankrupt, a new company would have formed out of the GM assets but without the pension baggage.
.
correct, and as of today, GM's underfunding of pensions exceeds its market capitalization, so ina few decades, it will either end up liquidating or requiring enormous new mountains of cash.
Please list all of these phantom car companies that didnt get bailed out and ceased to exist..
Are you really that dumb that you think BK = ceasing to exist?
Exactly.
GM had a few hundred thousand skilled workers. If GM were allowed to go under, the auto industry would still need hundreds of thousands of skilled workers. The demand for workers would not change. So other companies would have met the demand using ex GM workers.
correct, and as of today, GM's underfunding of pensions exceeds its market capitalization, so ina few decades, it will either end up liquidating or requiring enormous new mountains of cash.
Another bail out if the idiots in DC have their way.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.