Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So a week of bloviating at FOX and a day of hearings we are back where we were months ago.
Actually no but the WH has been keeping up and are reacting to the new information that has come out.
ABC was the big winner today with their "talking points" story of 12 revisions.
Funny, I watched the hearing and didn't see anything pointing to a scandal. What I did see was Republicans making unfounded charges of a coverup that was not based in evidence.
The evidence is there, it is IN WRITING AND SIGNED BY HILLARY CLINTON! You actually believe Carney??? LMAO, LOL ROFL, and plain ole BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. The joke is on you dude.
I think he assumes you and I agree on things. I have no idea where he gets that, other than we both seem to use reason. I'm not sure he's aware we come to different conclusions.
The evidence is there, it is IN WRITING AND SIGNED BY HILLARY CLINTON! You actually believe Carney??? LMAO, LOL ROFL, and plain ole BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. The joke is on you dude.
Hey, MTA probably has a graph to back up his statment! Now, it wont have any connection to reality but it will have pretty colors!
The evidence is there, it is IN WRITING AND SIGNED BY HILLARY CLINTON! You actually believe Carney??? LMAO, LOL ROFL, and plain ole BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. The joke is on you dude.
From the Times:
"The hearing did not prove anything like an administration cover-up or other hysterical allegations of crimes equal to Watergate that some Republicans, such as Representative Steve King and Senator Lindsey Graham, have alleged. Republicans have held numerous hearings and briefings on Benghazi and are threatening to hold even more. It is a level of interest they did not show during George W. Bush’s administration when there were 64 attacks on American diplomatic targets or in the years they spent cutting back diplomatic security budgets."
Funny, I watched the hearing and didn't see anything pointing to a scandal. What I did see was Republicans making unfounded charges of a coverup that was not based in evidence.
Status:
"everybody getting reported now.."
(set 25 days ago)
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,568 posts, read 16,552,753 times
Reputation: 6044
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robin Rossi
The evidence of the malfeasance of this administration, and its head is a voluminous as the delusion in your post - massive - overwhelming - MIND BOGGLING.
And FYI I and many of us did criticiize Bush trying to out Democrat the DemocRATS.
What evidence. every thing that came out this week backs up the administrations case.
Hillary Clinton was confirmed to have never seen the cable. The intelligence community were the ones who classified some of the information, not the administration. Hicks confirmed that Tyrone Woods and Dorehty were part of 2 separate response teams sent. The original grouped that was named as the attackers ended up being wrong, meaning all that BS about the Libyans knowing who to blame the same day wasnt even true, in fact we now no that the Libyan government didnt even agree on what had happened. It has even been confirmed that there were protest that day in Benghazi and around Libya.
Funny, I watched the hearing and didn't see anything pointing to a scandal. What I did see was Republicans making unfounded charges of a coverup that was not based in evidence.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.