Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If you want something to pass the house, you need to propose the opposite. For example, if you want higher taxes, you need to propose lower taxes. If you want background checks, you need to propose removal of all checkes, even at dealers. The Congress will always do the opposite of what people propose, so the only way to get your will is to propose the opposite. It is like dealing with rebellious teen-agers.
You know, we would not be in this situation if the left (yes the dems) would have stuck to thier own bill they passed while they held the House and Senate...
Or have you lefties forgot about Pay as YOU GO, PAGO....
The Act was introduced in the House of Representatives on June 17, 2009, by Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Maryland) and has been cosponsored by 169 of the 257 HouseDemocrats.[1]
Just sayin....
Quote:
At her final press conference as House Speaker, Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) said, "Deficit reduction has been a high priority for us. It is our mantra, pay-as-you-go."
Faith isn't even a possibility, except for the psychotics.
Solid evidence confirms that this teabagger house along with the filibustering senate are doggedly working against America's recovery from the disaster of Bush/Cheney.
You mispelled Bush\Clinton.
Guessing you have amnesia over whom repealed Glass-Steagall and signed NAFTA eh?
And you'll be wondering why the Republican Party can't win a presidential election again in 2016.
I won't because it's the same guy, different () at the end of the name.
Aren't you so glad that we've ended our wars?
Or is it kicking the wall-street influence out of the whitehouse that you are so happy about?
Ooooh I know! Mandatory purchase of FOR PROFIT health insurance, another win!
Well at least we cracked down on Bush's oil buddies?
Funny you guys didn't worry much about all the "expanding government grab" under George W. Bush. And yes, we'll keep bringing up his presidency (despite your attempts to have America forget) as long as you neo-cons are so hypocritical about Obama.
Funny you guys aren't worrying much about all the "expanding government grab" under Barrack H. Obama. And yes, we'll keep bringing up his presidency (despite your attempts to have America forget) as long as you libs are so hypocritical about Obama.
You've posted no "facts", just over the top opinions. Look at the real life facts of the last several elections and tell me again how the Republicans are going to start winning over women, gays, Latinos, blacks, Asians, and then get back to me.
Gee, surpise, surprise.
Women (some anyway)- I want to be able to kill my unborn child
Gays - I want to change "traditional marriage"
Latinos- my ethnic group should be above our immigration laws
Asians (haven't a clue)
Blacks (some anyway) I want my welfare check
and Whites (some anyway) bleeding heart liberals
The gimmee, gimmee mentality regardless of who it hurts vote Democrat because they will get what they want from them in exchange for their votes.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
