Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-15-2013, 05:55 PM
 
Location: Japan
15,292 posts, read 7,765,220 times
Reputation: 10006

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrapperJohn View Post
The last time the CO2 level was at 400ppm, sea levels were 80 feet higher. Where's the flooding?

"Current ratios of carbon dioxide in the Earth's atmosphere remain at levels not seen in more than 3 million years, when sea levels were as much as 80 feet higher than current levels."

LA Times
The sea is rising, but it will take a very long time for enough ice to melt, and enough thermal expansion to occur in ocean waters to get an 80-foot rise. That couldn't happen for hundreds of years even in a worst case scenario.

 
Old 05-15-2013, 05:56 PM
 
Location: Whoville....
25,386 posts, read 35,554,254 times
Reputation: 14692
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minethatbird View Post
How did they measure the levels 3 million years ago?

Maybe the scale of measurement has been changed.
They measure dissolved gasses in ice cores.
 
Old 05-15-2013, 09:07 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,496,494 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dark Enlightenment View Post
The sea is rising, but it will take a very long time for enough ice to melt, and enough thermal expansion to occur in ocean waters to get an 80-foot rise. That couldn't happen for hundreds of years even in a worst case scenario.
but the sea is not really rising...

the land raises and falls.....research tetonic plates
 
Old 05-15-2013, 09:59 PM
 
Location: Palo Alto
12,149 posts, read 8,422,794 times
Reputation: 4190
Quote:
Originally Posted by seattlenextyear View Post
Nope, you've got the quote wrong, but I applaud you for quoting James Hanson. I thought the conservatives hated him, but you must think he's pretty cool :

"Unless greenhouse emissions are curbed, average global temperatures can climb two to three degrees Celsius by 2100. The last time the earth was that warm, sea levels were 80 feet higher than today"
You were saying?
 
Old 05-15-2013, 10:14 PM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,858,743 times
Reputation: 20030
Quote:
Originally Posted by k.smith904 View Post
But saving the planet is bad for the economy!
that depends on how its done. if it is done through government regulation, then yes saving the planet is bad for the economy. but if we do it right, through changing business models through consumer pressure, and get more green products on the market, then no it isnt.
 
Old 05-15-2013, 10:22 PM
 
Location: ATX-HOU
10,216 posts, read 8,122,688 times
Reputation: 2037
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wapasha View Post
The AGW scammers always like to start with a timeline for when we had low temps, or in this case low CO2, and then compare that to today, to present the scam.

For example, they like to start a graph for temperature at around 1850, during the Little Ice-Age and claim the warming is dramatic and alarming.


If the alarmists would use a wider range of temperature over time, then people would see that temps have been warmer then today, and by comparison, it's not all that warm today.





It's the same way with CO2, they use the scary sounding phrase "Not Seen in Three Million Years" because a graph would show that our planet's historically low levels of CO2 started 3 million years ago, and levels were much higher 3+ million years ago.
What's your point? No climate scientists or any legitimate scientist would ever claim we weren't warmer in the past. Anyone with general scientific knowledge knows our planet has been frozen and molten lava.....So be gone strawman.

The problem is........ our entire human civilization is set up for the climate we currently have, that is 6 billion and growing, modernizing population.
 
Old 05-15-2013, 10:24 PM
 
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
17,823 posts, read 23,462,250 times
Reputation: 6541
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd View Post
Oops.... 400 PPM at Mouna Loa didnt happen after all...


Carbon dioxide in atmosphere did not break 400 ppm at Hawaii site - latimes.com
That is okay, because we probably exceeded the 400 ppm by a significant amount in Alaska. We currently have two erupting volcanoes.
 
Old 05-15-2013, 10:24 PM
 
Location: ATX-HOU
10,216 posts, read 8,122,688 times
Reputation: 2037
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbohm View Post
that depends on how its done. if it is done through government regulation, then yes saving the planet is bad for the economy. but if we do it right, through changing business models through consumer pressure, and get more green products on the market, then no it isnt.
Except for energy spikes that wreck havoc to the global economy...

Perhaps a.....gasp.... balanced approach with public and private sector involvement would be best?
 
Old 05-15-2013, 10:26 PM
 
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
17,823 posts, read 23,462,250 times
Reputation: 6541
Quote:
Originally Posted by marcopolo View Post
Greg, I'm with you 100% on this one! Scraping a mile thick sheet of ice off your windshield would be a lot harder to deal with than palm trees around the Great Lakes! Once upon a time, there were polar bears in Illinois. It is no crisis that they are no longer there, know what I mean? Things change.
We had more snow yesterday, and they are predicting more snow for this coming weekend.
 
Old 05-15-2013, 10:29 PM
 
9,659 posts, read 10,231,741 times
Reputation: 3225
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitch View Post
We had more snow yesterday, and they are predicting more snow for this coming weekend.
Have you ever heard of something called NAO?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top