Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Those aren't scandals. The U.S. loaned money to corporations before with great success. Because one company that got loans when bankrupt does not a scandal make. While one can argue about the wisdom of sending guns to Mexico and seeing where they ended up, it's not a corruption. It's a lapse of judgment.
When the Coca Cola company decided to replace the most success soft drink in history with "The New Coke," it wasn't a scandal.
lol. Coming from a guy who probably classifies the Regan, Iran-Contra fiasco as a scandal, because it was.
If you don't see how having your own ATF arming Mexican cartels with thousands of firearms, then lying about it, having your own AG under oath, lying through his teeth and clearly in contempt of court, isn't a scandal, then you're just an Obama homer with zero credibility.
Even Bill Clinton must be taken aback just a bit by what has happened!
What do you think the effects of this toxic White House will be on the mid-term elections for the democrat party?
What corruption? I have followed Benghazi, there is nothing there. I have yet to here one thing that is misconduct or corruption.
The AP story, the conservatives in June of last year were demanding that the White House investigate those leaks. The public for the worst I think, generally supports these sorts of investigations of anything classified as a leak. So this is another non story.
The IRS situation does represent real misconduct, but I fail to see how this touches the White House, and I fail to see what is going to get the public so outraged.
Here is the story, lying political groups are going to the government and asking for tax exemptions. I repeat To get these exemptions, these political organizations are lying about politics not being their primary purpose.
The IRS should ask ALL of these political organizations who are begging for tax exemptions tough questions and should deny almost all of them that tax exempt status.
The wrong was singling out certain groups and not others and making them wait longer.
But that isn't even behavior that most people would recognize as corruption.
This is fun! Okay, your turn. Now you show me where you said he resigned for any reason OTHER than for the good of the country.
You STILL haven't posted proof that I wrote Nixon ONLY resigned for the good of the country. Please back up what you've accused me of instead of posting things that are sorta kinda.
What corruption? I have followed Benghazi, there is nothing there. I have yet to here one thing that is misconduct or corruption.
The AP story, the conservatives in June of last year were demanding that the White House investigate those leaks. The public for the worst I think, generally supports these sorts of investigations of anything classified as a leak. So this is another non story.
The IRS situation does represent real misconduct, but I fail to see how this touches the White House, and I fail to see what is going to get the public so outraged.
Here is the story, lying political groups are going to the government and asking for tax exemptions. I repeat To get these exemptions, these political organizations are lying about politics not being their primary purpose.
The IRS should ask ALL of these political organizations who are begging for tax exemptions tough questions and should deny almost all of them that tax exempt status.
The wrong was singling out certain groups and not others and making them wait longer.
But that isn't even behavior that most people would recognize as corruption.
You STILL haven't posted proof that I wrote Nixon ONLY resigned for the good of the country. Please back up what you've accused me of instead of posting things that are sorta kinda.
Apparently I wrote it somewhere so where is it?
Sorry, I can only produce what you wrote, and that's what you wrote. It's not up to me to produce things you never said. Your logic is always so inane.
Sorry, I can only produce what you wrote, and that's what you wrote. It's not up to me to produce things you never said. Your logic is always so inane.
You produced what I wrote but you DID NOT produce what you CLAIMED I wrote.
Better luck next time.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
