Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Cutting Costs by Getting Rid of Buildings We Don't Need
This map visualizes a sampling of about 14,000 buildings and structures currently designated as excess. These properties range from sheds to underutilized office buildings and empty warehouses. Many of these assets will be disposed through demolition and transfers. Every excess asset taken off the books represents progress in the form of reduced operating and maintenance expenses, which cost the taxpayers almost $190 million a year.
Cutting Costs by Getting Rid of Buildings We Don't Need
This map visualizes a sampling of about 14,000 buildings and structures currently designated as excess. These properties range from sheds to underutilized office buildings and empty warehouses. Many of these assets will be disposed through demolition and transfers. Every excess asset taken off the books represents progress in the form of reduced operating and maintenance expenses, which cost the taxpayers almost $190 million a year.
Location: Georgia, on the Florida line, right above Tallahassee
10,471 posts, read 15,854,002 times
Reputation: 6438
Dude, you could own this lighthouse. https://extportal.pbs.gsa.gov/Resour...do?caseId=3632
Aids to Navigation (ATON): The ATON will remain the personal property of the USCG; they are solar-powered, active and automated. The Property has a powerful operating sound signal.
Sounds more like a hard-line Libertarian to me. Ron Paul, move over...
And to think they are selling off all of these properties and its not making a dent in the federal debt...
And just to be clear, I'm all for selling off properties, I believe Clinton sold off quite a few, but the bidding process should be open to everyone, and you really shouldnt do it at the bottom of a market..
Cutting Costs by Getting Rid of Buildings We Don't Need
This map visualizes a sampling of about 14,000 buildings and structures currently designated as excess. These properties range from sheds to underutilized office buildings and empty warehouses. Many of these assets will be disposed through demolition and transfers. Every excess asset taken off the books represents progress in the form of reduced operating and maintenance expenses, which cost the taxpayers almost $190 million a year.
"Plum Island"?? Wasn't that where Clarice Starling was going to transfer Hannibal Lecter if he cooperated with the FBI, so he could have the view he wanted?? Gosh, this may be worse than communism, people. Obama may be in cahoots with Hannibal Lecter.
Location: Georgia, on the Florida line, right above Tallahassee
10,471 posts, read 15,854,002 times
Reputation: 6438
As of the end of FY 2012, agencies reported a combination of $5.1 Billion in real property related savings from BRAC and $3.5 Billion in non-BRAC real property savings. Detailed information on the Administration’s non-BRAC real property savings are displayed here
As of the end of FY 2012, agencies reported a combination of $5.1 Billion in real property related savings from BRAC and $3.5 Billion in non-BRAC real property savings. Detailed information on the Administration’s non-BRAC real property savings are displayed here
For decades, the Federal Government, the largest property owner and energy user
in the United States, has managed more real estate than necessary to
effectively support its programs and missions. Both taxpayer dollars and
energy resources are being wasted to maintain these excess assets. In
addition, many of the properties necessary for the Government's work are not
operated efficiently, resulting in wasted funds and excessive greenhouse gas
pollution. For example, over the past decade, the private sector reduced
its data center footprint by capitalizing on innovative technologies to
increase efficiencies. However, during that same period, the Federal
Government experienced a substantial increase in the number of data centers,
leading to increased energy consumption, real property expenditures, and
operations and maintenance costs. Past attempts at reducing the Federal
Government's civilian real property assets produced small savings and had a
minor impact on the condition and performance of mission-critical
properties. These efforts were not sufficiently comprehensive in
disposing of excess real estate and did not emphasize making more efficient use
of existing assets.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
