Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Because the social services and safety nets provided by tax dollars, insurance policies and pensions were put in place to support spouses and their biological children. When you give an oddball abnormal mixed up loon legal power it disrupts the intention of those benefits. We may as well re write the entire Family and Probate legal professions.
sorry if you want in on the benefit pie you will have to make entry into the system through your biological children. Not by marrying your boyfriend and screwing his children out of what is rightfully thiers.
Your screen name is boner and you're extremely homophobic. How's the closet treating you?
No it doesnt. The system already allows for the instances of adoption and invitro.
so much fail on your part. You said the system was set up to support parents with biological children.
That SAME system is also there for parents who adopt, who use Invitro (and that doesn't mean they USE that couples sperm, egg, or both), and surrogacy (again, doesn't mean the surrogate is CARRYING the result of that couples egg and sperm). There is no distinction in those social programs. All those social programs ask is "do you have any children". They don't ask "how did you come about having children, and are they your biological ones... OH they aren't...then sorry, your child can't be covered under our insurance policy..."
Quote:
Or is that something that homos figured out on their own
Of course they didnt allow for the possibilty of a selfish gay trying to horn in on the benefits of children. The thought couldnt have possibly crossed their mind.
But you and I both know the intent of these benes
dont we?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arus
so much fail on your part. You said the system was set up to support parents with biological children.
That SAME system is also there for parents who adopt, who use Invitro (and that doesn't mean they USE that couples sperm, egg, or both), and surrogacy (again, doesn't mean the surrogate is CARRYING the result of that couples egg and sperm). There is no distinction in those social programs. All those social programs ask is "do you have any children". They don't ask "how did you come about having children, and are they your biological ones... OH they aren't...then sorry, your child can't be covered under our insurance policy..."
Moves to legalise gay marriage cleared a crucial parliamentary hurdle as it emerged that civil partnerships could be abolished as the price for getting David Cameron's plans on to the statute book.
Of course they didnt allow for the possibilty of a selfish gay trying to horn in on the benefits of children. The thought couldnt have possibly crossed their mind.
well, one gay couple can take the benefits I would have had, since I don't plan on marrying or having children.
for every gay couple that wants to get married and have children, there are hundreds of single people who will not or never get married or have children.
so again your argument falls flat on its prejudicial face
Because the social services and safety nets provided by tax dollars, insurance policies and pensions were put in place to support spouses and their biological children. When you give an oddball abnormal mixed up loon legal power it disrupts the intention of those benefits. We may as well re write the entire Family and Probate legal professions.
sorry if you want in on the benefit pie you will have to make entry into the system through your biological children. Not by marrying your boyfriend and screwing his children out of what is rightfully thiers.
Lie after lie, All people are equal and should have equal access to All the Rights and Benefits that we All pay for, otherwise us gay people are being taxed to support you straight people, we are thus subsizing your sex life and your children. Support your own kids and stop depending on every one else. It makes you guys the suckers off of the system. You all say it is about the kids, baloney, you just want to deny us the same that you get even if we have kids, get that KIDS, you do not care about the kids. YOU ARE THE GREEDY ONES TAKING OUR MONEY AND PUTTING IT IN YOUR POCKETS. Get the heck out of my pockets, I work hard for my money and deserve the same that you get, not less. The oddballs are people like you. More people support equal marriage rights for gay couples than don't.
Of course they didnt allow for the possibilty of a selfish gay trying to horn in on the benefits of children. The thought couldnt have possibly crossed their mind.
But you and I both know the intent of these benes
dont we?
You do not know squat, typical of those with a low level of understanding of anything that resembles equality. The concept is foreign to them, someting often seen with a superiority complex. Say your lies over and over thinking it will make it true, but it is still a lie, a flat out lie.
You do not know squat, typical of those with a low level of understanding of anything that resembles equality. The concept is foreign to them, someting often seen with a superiority complex. Say your lies over and over thinking it will make it true, but it is still a lie, a flat out lie.
Trying to explain why racism/bigotry is wrong is pointless on an internet forum due to anonymity. The shame of stupidity/hate doesn't exist in a forum like this.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.