Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-27-2013, 09:04 PM
 
Location: Chesapeake Bay
6,046 posts, read 4,823,901 times
Reputation: 3544

Advertisements

A couple of sour grape postings I see.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-27-2013, 09:06 PM
 
Location: Jacksonville, FL
11,149 posts, read 10,726,844 times
Reputation: 9816
Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post
So it isn't runaway socialism and a take over the healthcare system by the guvment?!?!?

Which is it, were you for the establishment of a national health care system or leading the charge claiming that Obamacare was part of a vast socialist plot?
Actually, if you look up my posting history on Obamacare I've held the position that it was a gross misuse of power to force individuals into purchasing a product supplied by a private company without any sort of firm price controls on that product. I don't believe that I've called it a socialist program, although I will say that it skirts the outer edges of theoretical socialism (government interference in the free market), so it's entirely possible that I have made that accusation.

IMO, Obamacare is designed to be a failure, with the hopes that once it fails a true Universal Health Care system can be pushed through at a far greater expense to the average American citizen. After all, the people who support it are, mostly, the same people who wish to compare the United States unfavorably with Europe, and Europe's claim to fame is the various styles of UHC in European countries. Those same people tend to overlook the fact that the financial burdens that have been placed on European countries by their UHC programs contributed greatly to the financial collapse that has crippled the European economies.

While I think the idea of UHC is a laudable one, the reality of UHC and the crippling effect it has on not only the economy but also on the quality of medical care pushes me away from endorsing the idea. As for Obamacare, it's a poorly written mishmash of our previous insurance system and a single-payer system which is going to add trillions of dollars to our deficit while imposing greater financial burdens on the very people whose healthcare was supposed to become more affordable after its passage. On top of this, it further expands our already massive government and hands even more power to the proven-to-be-untrustworthy IRS.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2013, 09:06 PM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,031,985 times
Reputation: 5455
Quote:
Originally Posted by Weichert View Post
A couple of sour grape postings I see.
No it's called reality. This isn't some game like you folks all think it is. I guess Obama and your democrat buddies taught you that. Pathetic is what it is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2013, 09:07 PM
 
Location: Western Oregon
472 posts, read 571,152 times
Reputation: 385
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomstudent View Post
That reminds me of the old GOP motto, "Government doesn't work, elect us and we will prove it."
Hahhhh
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2013, 09:07 PM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,031,985 times
Reputation: 5455
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimRom View Post
IMO, Obamacare is designed to be a failure, with the hopes that once it fails a true Universal Health Care system can be pushed through at a far greater expense to the average American citizen.
Yep that is exactly what it is. The sheep will just line up and scream gimme is what they are counting on and what they will of course get.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2013, 09:11 PM
 
Location: Chesapeake Bay
6,046 posts, read 4,823,901 times
Reputation: 3544
And you KUchief25 will be right in line with everyone else.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2013, 09:11 PM
 
Location: Western Oregon
472 posts, read 571,152 times
Reputation: 385
Calling people who disagree with you "sheep" is so commonplace. Both sides do it. It means nothing any more, no more than calling someone "stupid". Get some new vocabulary, please.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2013, 10:18 PM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,088,423 times
Reputation: 15038
Watch'n ya squirm is helarious!




Quote:
Originally Posted by ALackOfCreativity View Post
Yup, unlike the blues and kaiser they have less to lose both politically and in terms of market share for not playing ball on the exchange rates.
Yeah, yeah, yeah... the numbers for the newly insured and the rates that are being offered speak for themselves. If Aetna and Cigna choose to opt out, who cares, people are being insured and the rate increase in marginal for those who aren't paying less.

Quote:
We'll see what happens in 2015 and 2016 as claims experience comes in. They're certainly going out on a limb pricing so far below the Optum numbers (from the SOA study).
Yeah, like hyper-inflation, Michelle's Whitey video, Romney winning and a whole bunch of other wait and sees we've been promised over the last few years.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot_Handz View Post
It's cronyism...which is every bit as bad.
Another one who needs to buy a freaking dictionary:

cro·ny·ism (krn-zm)
n.
Favoritism shown to old friends without regard for their qualifications, as in political appointments to office. (see Haliburton)


Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaffeetrekker View Post
Yeah...I read that the Crips and Bloods will join the Wellpoint plan and the Zetas and Northern Mexicans will sign on with Humana...Travelers is getting record numbers of undocumented aliens along with their families signing onto their plan...All the other gangs are still reviewing policies looking for the best deal with other insurers before they sign on...
As long as their insured taxpayers don't have to pay for their gang related injuries.

Quote:
Originally Posted by KUchief25 View Post
What part of Mircea's post do you not understand?? Let me guess..............all of it?? lol
What part of obstructionism do you not understand?



Who wants to be next in line for some cheese to go with their whine?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2013, 10:33 PM
 
3,617 posts, read 3,889,493 times
Reputation: 2295
Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post

Yeah, yeah, yeah... the numbers for the newly insured and the rates that are being offered speak for themselves. If Aetna and Cigna choose to opt out, who cares, people are being insured and the rate increase in marginal for those who aren't paying less.



Yeah, like hyper-inflation, Michelle's Whitey video, Romney winning and a whole bunch of other wait and sees we've been promised over the last few years.
It matters because the medium-term impact of the ACA on prices (i.e. post-2014) is going to reflect claims experience and runout for 2014, 2015, etc. rather than 2014 prices.

Further, it matters that the only big players offering rates that were accepted were the locals, and that Aetna, Cigna, United, etc. aren't in the game because of what that signals about their internal projections and forecasts. Either kaiser and the blues are making a brilliant/lucky prediction and will be rewarded for it with better market share and good relations with the CA insurance commissioner, or they're going to bleed red ink.

It'll be interesting to see how it all plays out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2013, 10:34 PM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,088,423 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimRom View Post
Actually, if you look up my posting history on Obamacare I've held the position that it was a gross misuse of power to force individuals into purchasing a product supplied by a private company without any sort of firm price controls on that product.
While I disagree with your post both in general and in many of the specifics. It is the best argued post that I've read in a long time from the opposition and for no other reason than that I applaud you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top