Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 06-01-2013, 06:28 AM
 
Location: New Orleans, La. USA
6,354 posts, read 3,656,336 times
Reputation: 2522

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by lionsgators View Post
weren't you claiming previously that people who make $90k were paying more in taxes? in order to learn something, I must first be familiar with the "teacher." I have no clue what "rush radio" is. if by learning crap, you are referring to simple mathematics, I am guilty.
Perhaps I said people who make $90,000 a year pay 30%+, when its actually 28%.

I was also claiming that billionaires pay 17%, but its actually 11% to 14%.

I was in the ballpark, (while you're in supply side/trickle down land !!!)

 
Old 06-01-2013, 06:32 AM
 
6,073 posts, read 4,754,520 times
Reputation: 2635
Quote:
Originally Posted by chad3 View Post
Perhaps I said people who make $90,000 a year pay 30%+, when its actually 28%.

I was also claiming that billionaires pay 17%, but its actually 11% to 14%.

I was in the ballpark, (while you're in supply side/trickle down land !!!)
you also claimed that $27,000 was more than $170,000,000
 
Old 06-01-2013, 06:54 AM
 
4,698 posts, read 4,076,123 times
Reputation: 2483
Quote:
Originally Posted by lionsgators View Post
you also claimed that $27,000 was more than $170,000,000
Can you explain this situation. For us watching the situation makes no sense.
 
Old 06-01-2013, 07:09 AM
 
Location: SE Arizona - FINALLY! :D
20,460 posts, read 26,337,717 times
Reputation: 7627
Quote:
Originally Posted by lionsgators View Post
so comparing an income tax to a capital gains tax is your argument? you want to raise taxes on the 100,000,000 americans that have a 401k? you want to raise taxes on teachers, police officers, firemen, and the working poor? another example of the hatred for the poor most liberals possess..
It's not 100,000,000 Americans that 401K's - it's 50,000,000. More to the point however, 401K's not taxed on capital gains. They are taxed TODAY as REGULAR INCOME (ie at the potentially HIGHER tax rate than the folks making their money through capital gains - depending of course on how much total income the people pulling from their 401K are making when they pull the money).

Ken
 
Old 06-01-2013, 07:29 AM
 
Location: SE Arizona - FINALLY! :D
20,460 posts, read 26,337,717 times
Reputation: 7627
Quote:
Originally Posted by lionsgators View Post
no. anyone who earns a salary of a billion dollars a year will pay 35% in taxes on that income.
And someone who earns a billion dollars a year from long-term capital gains will pay 15% in taxes on that income.

You know damn well that Buffet, Cheney and Romney don't make the vast bulk of their income on SALARY - they make it in long-term capital gains. How much the income tax rate is on the super rich is not really relevent when most of those folks make their money under long-term capital gains. For folks who make the bulk of their money via long-term capital gains, it's the long-term capital gains tax rate that's relevent - not the income tax rate, and the long-term capital gains tax rate is 15%.

Ken
 
Old 06-01-2013, 09:39 AM
 
47,525 posts, read 69,716,559 times
Reputation: 22474
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordBalfor View Post
And someone who earns a billion dollars a year from long-term capital gains will pay 15% in taxes on that income.

You know damn well that Buffet, Cheney and Romney don't make the vast bulk of their income on SALARY - they make it in long-term capital gains. How much the income tax rate is on the super rich is not really relevent when most of those folks make their money under long-term capital gains. For folks who make the bulk of their money via long-term capital gains, it's the long-term capital gains tax rate that's relevent - not the income tax rate, and the long-term capital gains tax rate is 15%.

Ken
Hey --- you left off the now filthy rich Clintons, Al Gore and all those other greedy wealthy fat cats.
 
Old 06-01-2013, 09:42 AM
 
Location: USA
5,738 posts, read 5,446,162 times
Reputation: 3669
Another fail of a thread from conservatives who know nothing about other countries.
 
Old 06-01-2013, 10:25 AM
 
8,391 posts, read 6,299,061 times
Reputation: 2314
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camlon View Post
No it isn't. But it is stupid, because it's not like countries like Greece had any option. They run out of money. If you as a household run out of money, then you got to cut.

Why don't liberals understand that countries in Europe did not enact austerity from free will. They were forced to enact austerity because no one was willing to borrow them money.


And liberals think Scandinavia is the most left wing section of Europe, even though it isn't.

Also, no countries in Europe are socialist. Many are social democratic.


Also, it sounds like what you really want to say is Republicans. There are some Democrats who are conservative too. Does your analysis apply for them too?
The governments of those nations did agree to enact austerity measures. Those governments were elected to represent the people of those nations.

Those nation's enacted austerity measures. Your point about it not being done of free will is completely irrelevant to the damage that austerity measures have done in those nations.

The rest of your post is irrelevant.
 
Old 06-01-2013, 11:43 AM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,473,584 times
Reputation: 4799
Quote:
Originally Posted by chad3 View Post
Heres Forbes saying Warren Buffett had a 11% tax rate.
Warren Buffett's Effective Federal Income Tax Rate Was Just 11% - Forbes


This source shows Dick Cheney has a 13% tax rate.
http://www.ctj.org/pdf/bushchen.pdf


This source shows how Mitt Romney has a 14% tax rate.
Mitt Romney Taxes: Campaign Releasing 2011 Returns


What tax rate do American who make $90,000 a year pay ??
Answer: 28%.
Quote:
2009:
Lowest Quntile - 1.0
Second Quintile - 6.8
Middle Quintile - 11.1
Fourth Quintile - 15.1
Highest Quintile - 23.2
http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxfa...orical_all.pdf

Oops.
 
Old 06-01-2013, 12:23 PM
 
Location: SE Arizona - FINALLY! :D
20,460 posts, read 26,337,717 times
Reputation: 7627
Quote:
Originally Posted by malamute View Post
Hey --- you left off the now filthy rich Clintons, Al Gore and all those other greedy wealthy fat cats.
I don't think Buffet is greedy. He earned every penny he made. The question is - does he deserve such a low tax rate simply because of the METHOD with which he earned his income.

Ken
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:39 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top