Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Repeal "Stand your Ground" laws?
Yes 64 32.16%
No 135 67.84%
Voters: 199. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-16-2013, 09:09 AM
 
6,137 posts, read 4,862,292 times
Reputation: 1517

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
But how is that different from a plain old self defense law?
What?

SYG says you do not have a duty to retreat.

By definition, a law that is not an "SYG law" does not state that you do not have a duty to retreat.

In more liberal states, a duty to retreat is often explicitly stated in self defense statutes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-16-2013, 09:09 AM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,187,290 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamBarrow View Post
But explain to me how this is any more difficult than shooting someone, punching yourself, and claiming plain old self defense?

Again, if you admit to instigating a fight, you are essentially denying yourself the protections of SYG. If you don't admit to instigating a fight, well, you are in no different a situation than anyone who commits murder and lies with a claim of self defense.

This may come as a shock to you - but I am not sure I am okay with this.

I am however 100% sure that I am not okay with the blatant misrepresentation and lies that abound when the subject is being discussed.
Then what's the point of having a stand your ground law? You don't need stand your ground to claim self defense when murdering someone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2013, 09:13 AM
 
6,137 posts, read 4,862,292 times
Reputation: 1517
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
Then what's the point of having a stand your ground law?
The point of having a stand your ground law is to clear up ambiguity.

SYG seeks to mitigate risk by allowing potential victims to use force without being required to make the decision whether or not to retreat in a potentially life threatening situation. Requiring them to make this decision in a split second could easily cost them their lives should they attempt to retreat out of fear of legal consequences, but fail at doing so.

The insistence upon this requirement is really armchair quarterbacking at its finest. I will not support a law that requires innocent victims of crime to put their lives at even 0.01% more risk in order to protect the physical safety of a criminal intending to do them harm.

Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
You don't need stand your ground to claim self defense when murdering someone.
You're either misspeaking, or reversing your position and agreeing with me completely.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2013, 09:14 AM
 
26,694 posts, read 14,569,031 times
Reputation: 8094
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
And that is how Zimmerman got away with murder, it is easy to lie and say it was in self defense when the other person is dead.
Innocent until proven guilty, right? You are functioning at the level of "guilty until proven innocent."

If you can't prove Zimmerman guilty, you can't say he got away with murder because he's innocent.

I do not know how in good conscience you claim that Zimmerman got away with murder. Maybe he did murder Trayvon but apparently the legal system disagreed with you. You weren't there and you weren't even on the jury.

If I go back to "innocent until proven guilty", you are just fabricating stuff to push a agenda or you are just completely ignorant. Either one is not good.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2013, 09:16 AM
 
6,137 posts, read 4,862,292 times
Reputation: 1517
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
And that is how Zimmerman got away with murder, it is easy to lie and say it was in self defense when the other person is dead.
If Zimmerman was able to claim an inability to retreat, the exact same would have happened under any self defense law.

The whole "following" issue, despite popular conception, had nothing to do with SYG.

Note that Zimmerman didn't even claim SYG.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2013, 09:20 AM
 
26,694 posts, read 14,569,031 times
Reputation: 8094
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
Then what's the point of having a stand your ground law? You don't need stand your ground to claim self defense when murdering someone.
You can claim all you want but what you proven in court is a totally different matter. You claim self defense if you actually murdered someone, it does NOT mean you will always get away with your murder.

Sure, if there's no witness and no physical evidence to correlate, you can get away with anything you say as long as you are consistent. It's not the flaw of the law and it has absolutely nothing to do with SYG or self defense. It has everything to do with "innocent until proven guilty."

Unless you suggest we change that, yes, you can get away with murder if there's no witness and no physical evidence. People do that all the time. Hell, if there's no witness and no physical evidence, why do you even NEED to claim anything? Just keep your mouth shut and move on. How can they even catch you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2013, 09:23 AM
 
6,137 posts, read 4,862,292 times
Reputation: 1517
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifeexplorer View Post
You can claim all you want but what you proven in court is a totally different matter. You claim self defense if you actually murdered someone, it does NOT mean you will get away with murder.

Sure, if there's no witness and no physical evidence to correlate, you can get away with anything you say as long as you are consistent. It's not the flaw of the law and it has absolutely nothing to do with SYG or self defense. It has everything to do with "innocent until proven guilty."

Unless you suggest we change that, yes, you can get away with murder if there's no witness and no physical evidence. People do that all the time.
Hey, we can stop people from lying and claiming self defense. It'll be easy. All we have to do is abolish all self defense laws. Kill to defend yourself? Get 25 to life, or even the death penalty, just like any cold blooded killer.

That's about the only solution I see to the complaints being echoed here.

The attempt to pin false self defense claims on SYG alone is laughable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2013, 09:29 AM
 
26,694 posts, read 14,569,031 times
Reputation: 8094
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
Then what's the point of having a stand your ground law? You don't need stand your ground to claim self defense when murdering someone.

The point? So the victims don't need to be hauled through our legal system just because they defended their life. Think about it, if you are in a place where you have a right to be and you aren't committing any crime or soliciting a fight, why should you be put through our legal system after you shot someone who broke your nose, knocked you down, sat on top of you and bashed your head on the concrete floor?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2013, 09:38 AM
 
26,694 posts, read 14,569,031 times
Reputation: 8094
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamBarrow View Post
No, they only locked her up because of racism, remember! Had she been white, she would have walked!

Marissa Alexander Case vs. George Zimmerman Case
You mean white Hispanic?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2013, 09:45 AM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,187,290 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamBarrow View Post
The point of having a stand your ground law is to clear up ambiguity.

SYG seeks to mitigate risk by allowing potential victims to use force without being required to make the decision whether or not to retreat in a potentially life threatening situation. Requiring them to make this decision in a split second could easily cost them their lives should they attempt to retreat out of fear of legal consequences, but fail at doing so.

The insistence upon this requirement is really armchair quarterbacking at its finest. I will not support a law that requires innocent victims of crime to put their lives at even 0.01% more risk in order to protect the physical safety of a criminal intending to do them harm.



You're either misspeaking, or reversing your position and agreeing with me completely.
So stand your ground let's murder be the first option rather than the last option. Which is great when it comes to picking a fight with someone cause if they fight back, you can just shoot them and claim you were standing your ground.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:18 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top