Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-19-2013, 07:32 PM
 
20,524 posts, read 15,912,063 times
Reputation: 5948

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by JimRom View Post
In before "It's all Bush's fault"
Uh; I ain't letting Bush 43 off the hook either but Obama has been POTUS for almost 5 years now so it's on him.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-20-2013, 05:00 AM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,956,603 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
Yes- voting in another democrat

So.............................given five years, soon to be eight years, of declining incomes, reduced savings, lower standard of living, and higher unemployment, the average liberal will be begging for MORE of this "wonder"?

Remember when Carter was voted out for his disasterous presidency? Now we have America re-electing and craving more failed policy and economic misery for the US!

The idiocy of the nation is astounding.
Apart from what the right wing says, Obama is not a dictator that can single handedly enact laws. He needs Congress. Blaming Obama would have more weight if the GOP didn't block his expansionary programs, like his jobs bills. You can't honestly complain that a runner is too slow while you kick him in the knees.

Why shouldn't Mr. Obama been reelected, when the GOP nominates someone with the viewpoint of Thurston Howell the 3rd?

Last edited by MTAtech; 08-20-2013 at 05:15 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2013, 05:18 AM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,119,250 times
Reputation: 8527
No, Obama will leave office when the new President is inaugurated, not one minute before, no matter how much you guys wish it were otherwise.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2013, 06:07 AM
 
30,072 posts, read 18,678,343 times
Reputation: 20892
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
Apart from what the right wing says, Obama is not a dictator that can single handedly enact laws. He needs Congress. Blaming Obama would have more weight if the GOP didn't block his expansionary programs, like his jobs bills. You can't honestly complain that a runner is too slow while you kick him in the knees.

Why shouldn't Mr. Obama been reelected, when the GOP nominates someone with the viewpoint of Thurston Howell the 3rd?
1. Obama DOES enact laws via executive orders and working through HUD and the EPA

2. Obama violates the law (choosing to halt componants of Obamacare, killing US citizens without due process, spying on US citizens).

3. Obama OWNS this economy. Leftist, anti-business policy creates more unemployment, lower wages, lower personal savings, and a lower standard of living. The left, in their zeal for "women's rights" and "gay rights" prefer a poor economy and promotion of these weird social issues.

4. Obama chooses not to work with Congress and is a petulent, partisan hack who will not compromise with anyone. The nation suffers from his incompetence.


MTA- face it. Obama and his whole concept of liberalism has failed. The nation is in the crapper due to his lack of leadership. The blaming Bush excuse (after five years) has worn thin- the nation realizes it is time to blame Obama.

What will libs do in 2016? They will vote for someone who promotes the same, failed policies. This, of course, is the definition of insanity. However, given the number of government dependents, it is likely that a lib will take the Oval Office again in 2016, thus adding more nails to the coffin of the US. More failed policy will deliver more economic misery to the US.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2013, 06:16 AM
 
171 posts, read 228,453 times
Reputation: 38
Be careful what you believe in to be real.....it may be just an act.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2013, 06:43 AM
 
Location: On the Group W bench
5,563 posts, read 4,264,862 times
Reputation: 2127
Quote:
Originally Posted by gunlover View Post
So when we block a bill that prevents the violation of the 2nd Amendment, or legalizing millions of undocumented Democratic voter, or some failed spending project that will put generations unborn in debt its is obstructionism?

You must like Alan Grayson, his is loud and devoid of logic and reason..

Come 2016 The dems will be in trouble, which one one new, no one to attract the coolness of the youth, and 8 years of failed policies.. you guys face a up hill battle in 2014, 2016 does not look any better, factor in Ted Cruz and Rand Paul....need a say more.
Stop! I just spit Diet Coke all over my keyboard laughing!

At least give a girl some warning before you launch into your comedy routine.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2013, 06:59 AM
 
Location: In a cave
945 posts, read 968,992 times
Reputation: 721
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
Obama's presidency has been one of abject failure and economic misery, scarred by scandal. The only jobs the admin has "created" are part time jobs. Incomes, savings, and standard of living has fallen during the Obama administration, and we have three more years of this downtrend to endure.

2016- How are the libs going to promote four more years of liberal "rule" after this debacle? Will Americans be dumb enough to vote for another liberal and doom the nation to four more years of economic misery? Has the electorate become conditioned, via government treats for votes programs, to simply vote democrat, regardless of performance and personal voter economic misery?

Libs- If liberal policy is so great, why do we have greater numbers of unemployed (or underemployed), lower incomes, lower savings, and more people on food stamps? The only people that appear to have prospered under Obama is the "1%ers"- oddly the people that Obama purports to hate.
Of course Hillary will be elected and we will have Obama 2.0 for another 8 years.

The country is lost, the stealing thieves have officially proliferated to the majority and those who work, save and plan are now the villains and the source of wealth for the dregs of society.

Unemployment doesn't matter anymore, it's an outdated number which requires one to desire to work to matter.

Why would you work when you can not work and have a free-ride? This is basic logic and common sense, the trash has won by throwing as many bodies against the voting systems until the unrelenting effort resulted in a seismic shift towards Marxism and paralytic political correctness.

Just relax, enjoy the remaining time while you can while this plane on empty glides into the mountains.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:16 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top