Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-14-2013, 04:49 PM
 
Location: The South
7,494 posts, read 6,287,099 times
Reputation: 13015

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by proveick View Post
They're going to school to play on scholarships... their payment is their free tuition as well as perks. They're working towards their professional career... they should absolutely NOT be paid.
I think all sports associated with anything round should be banned from all schools. Then you don't need to even consider the question.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-17-2013, 02:17 PM
 
Location: Florida -
10,213 posts, read 14,865,428 times
Reputation: 21848
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kibby View Post
The "revenue sharing" as you put it - is that the high profile revenue sports bring in the money to support all the women's sports that are mandated by the government. Basketball/Football/Baseball also support swimming, tennis, gold ... whatever. It's hard enough for these College athletes to deal with the rigor of high profile sports and an attempt to get an education, without turning them "pro" way before they are emotionally ready for it. The NCAA and College leadership needs to keep a closer eye on what is going on with their sports programs ..... PERIOD.
The University should use a portion of the funds generated by high profile sports, to support its overall sports programs. However, 'revenue sharing' (at least in the context I was using) refers to some type of 'sharing' with the athletes who actually generate the revenue ... NOT the college 'sharing' those funds with others.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2013, 02:26 PM
 
27,210 posts, read 15,389,880 times
Reputation: 12109
No.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2013, 03:14 PM
 
Location: Maryland
18,630 posts, read 19,454,104 times
Reputation: 6462
Quote:
Originally Posted by proveick View Post
They're going to school to play on scholarships... their payment is their free tuition as well as perks. They're working towards their professional career... they should absolutely NOT be paid.
Yes. The pay can be in addition to their scholarships. Although I wouldn't pay them directly but into a trust fund that they can draw upon completion. These programs are making tons of money off of these kids. They deserve a cut or they need to stop selling their jerseys and stuff.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2013, 03:18 PM
 
Location: Sango, TN
24,868 posts, read 24,431,866 times
Reputation: 8672
Quote:
Originally Posted by proveick View Post
They're going to school to play on scholarships... their payment is their free tuition as well as perks. They're working towards their professional career... they should absolutely NOT be paid.
I'd say a free education should be payment enough.

In reality, the only way to keep the game honest and clean, would be to pay them a salary of somekind.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2013, 03:20 PM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,046,296 times
Reputation: 5455
Don't tell the SEC that or they could lose some football recruits if everybody was allowed to pay em!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2013, 03:22 PM
 
Location: Sango, TN
24,868 posts, read 24,431,866 times
Reputation: 8672
Quote:
Originally Posted by KUchief25 View Post
Don't tell the SEC that or they could lose some football recruits if everybody was allowed to pay em!!
Sounds like another jealous member of someone outside of the best conference in college football
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2013, 03:26 PM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,046,296 times
Reputation: 5455
Eric Dickerson never took a penny either. LOL

Of course that was the SWC but many of those crooks headed to the SEC. Cam Newton never took anything either I hear. Hey I love watching SEC football just know what goes on in the "game" of recruiting especially between those schools in that conference. Paying athletes a stipend would even out the field a bit but the SEC would still get most of the good ones like they do now. The "good old boys" just have to get more creative. The days of working at some boosters car lot turning the lights on and off and making a couple grand a week are over.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2013, 09:46 AM
 
16,686 posts, read 8,690,952 times
Reputation: 19517
Quote:
Originally Posted by EdwardA View Post
Yes. The pay can be in addition to their scholarships. Although I wouldn't pay them directly but into a trust fund that they can draw upon completion. These programs are making tons of money off of these kids. They deserve a cut or they need to stop selling their jerseys and stuff.
That is a novel idea because it would give incentives to staying is college and finishing their degree. In D1 baseball, they can be drafted in their junior year. Granted if it were a stud player who would make many millions entering the pros, the money accrued in a trust fund will not make a difference. However many college athletes who can be drafted into the pros find the issue complex because many pro contracts (except for the elite players) are minimal. I'm just throwing out random numbers here, but someone drafted 759th in the late rounds for $50K might very well decided to stay in school to not only complete their degree, but also get the money upon graduation.

Sounds like a solid incentive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2013, 10:01 AM
 
Location: Billings, MT
9,884 posts, read 11,004,162 times
Reputation: 14180
I really don't care whether they get "paid" or not. Either way, it will have zero effect on me or my family.
I feel the same way about "performance enhancing drugs". If they want to use them, let them. If the drugs wind up killing them, it is the problem of THEIR family, not mine.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:37 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top