Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
A federal jury has rejected the argument that use of the N-word among blacks can be a culturally acceptable term of love and endearment, deciding its use in the workplace is hostile and discriminatory no matter what.
Jurors last week awarded $250,000 in compensatory damages to a black employment agency worker who was the target of an N-word-laced rant by her black boss, and they return to a Manhattan federal court Tuesday to decide on punitive damages. NY case puts N-word use among blacks on trial - News from The Associated Press
It is a double standard. I wouldn't have used that particular argument at a trial regarding an employer's use of the word..That is an entirely different realm. I don't understand why an employer would address an employee with that term, endearing or not, knowing the possible consequences..I don't approve of the use of the word PEROID..
What is the specific double standard in this case?
if you really need this explained to you, i suggest you go actually read the story in the link.
oh hell, i guess i have time to coach you thru it
Quote:
The case against Rob Carmona and the employment agency he founded, STRIVE East Harlem, gave legal airing to what some see as a complex double standard surrounding the word: It's a degrading slur when uttered by whites but can be used at times with impunity among blacks.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.