Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-19-2013, 09:24 AM
 
23,838 posts, read 23,157,518 times
Reputation: 9409

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
No it doesn't.

If the Treasury was running a surplus, the Treasury would still have to pay off debts it incurred.



Only if you run a deficit , like we typically do.
It would also mean there would be no need for a debt ceiling increase. Why are you playing these stupid semantical games? To protect The One?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-19-2013, 09:27 AM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,798,305 times
Reputation: 4174
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
Semantics and circular argument.
Hey, the Left has nothing else. And never had had anything else, come to think of it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2013, 09:32 AM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,770,209 times
Reputation: 14746
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
It would also mean there would be no need for a debt ceiling increase.
Correct.

Quote:
Why are you playing these stupid semantical games? To protect The One?
I'm just following and correcting the statements you think are factual.

If that's a stupid game, you only have yourself to blame for saying things that are not accurate. It appears to have no coherent conclusion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2013, 09:33 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,200,976 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
Correct.

I'm just following your argument, here. It appears to have no coherent conclusion.
So you admit that raising the debt ceiling is because there is more debt, otherwise an increase wouldnt be needed, so I have to ask what the hells your point?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2013, 09:36 AM
 
2,861 posts, read 3,857,586 times
Reputation: 2351
Our leaders know they can just print more money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2013, 09:37 AM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,770,209 times
Reputation: 14746
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
raising the debt ceiling is because there is more debt, otherwise an increase wouldnt be needed
no, this makes no sense at all.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimazee View Post
Our leaders know they can just print more money.
this, on the other hand , is correct.

and true.

and exactly what needs to be done.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2013, 09:38 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,200,976 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
no, this makes no sense at all.
What doesnt make more sense, the fact that one needs to raise the debt ceiling in order to spend more than they have, or the fact that people are supporting spending more than they have, by increasing the debt ceiling?
Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
this, on the other hand , is correct.

and true.

and exactly what needs to be done.
So now we need to devalue the dollar as well?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2013, 09:42 AM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,770,209 times
Reputation: 14746
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
What doesnt make more sense
Your words are too vague, you aren't specific enough about who "We" are, and what kind of debt that the aforementioned "We" supposedly has.

There are many players in this game -- households, the u.s. government, foreign governments, the financial sector, the central bank, and foreign central banks. Some of them are debtors, some of them are lenders.


Quote:
the fact that one needs to raise the debt ceiling in order to spend more than they have
Well, it is the CONGRESS who raises the debt ceiling.

And they do so in order to have the FEDERAL RESERVE generate assets

Which it then lends to the TREASURY so the treasury can pay off its DEBTS.

When you say, "WE", you are vague about whether you're talking about Congress, the Federal Reserve, the Treasury, or someone else entirely.

Quote:
or the fact that people are supporting spending more than they have, by increasing the debt ceiling?
You seem to not grasp the concept of "currency."

"We," the American people, don't run out of U.S. Dollars.

Now, the U.S. Treasury might run out of Baht, or Euros, or Kroner -- but that's precisely why the U.S. Treasury doesn't borrow money in those currencies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2013, 09:45 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,200,976 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
Your words are too vague, you aren't specific enough about who "We" are, and what kind of debt that the aforementioned "We" supposedly has.

There are many players in this game -- households, the u.s. government, foreign governments, the financial sector, the central bank, and foreign central banks. Some of them are debtors, some of them are lenders.

Well, it is the CONGRESS who raises the debt ceiling.

And they do so in order to have the FEDERAL RESERVE generate assets

Which it then lends to the TREASURY so the treasury can pay off its DEBTS.

When you say, "WE", you are vague about whether you're talking about Congress, the Federal Reserve, the Treasury, or someone else entirely.

You seem to not grasp the concept of "currency."

"We," the American people, don't run out of dollars.
Weird you keep quoting this "we"..

Where did I say we, because you said this
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
So you admit that raising the debt ceiling is because there is more debt, otherwise an increase wouldnt be needed, so I have to ask what the hells your point?
Didnt make sense, and I didnt use the word we in it once.

Did you forget your meds today?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2013, 09:51 AM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,798,305 times
Reputation: 4174
President Obama made a more-than-usually ridiculous statement today, saying that raising the debt ceiling does not increase our debt.

He seems to be trying to get people (Congress, to be exact) to raise the debt ceiling by promising the debt will NOT go up if they do.

Does anyone actually believe that?

Would anyone like to place a bet, that the National Debt will NOT increase by a TRILLION dollars or more, within, say, one week of the debt ceiling being raised by an amount that would allow that?

Stunning.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top