Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Haha, like lefties whining about a 4.5% unemployment rate under Bush, and celebrating a 7.5% one under Obama? Must suck to have such low standards for your own party...
btw, there is nothing inconsistant about wanting government smaller.. You can imagine that smaller government doesnt equal smaller government, but thats an issue you need to cope with.
psssst....remember the great recession? That might have had something to do with the unemployment rate.
I can't speak for anyone but myself but you can go back and look. What I said was that it was Obama's idea's and one of the few good ones he ever came up with.
It's always been good. This is where you diverge from reality. Saying that it was Obama's idea doesn't make it a bad idea for anyone outside of those who think the government should continue spending recklessly.
The irony of course, is that the OP created threads, whining about the Paul Ryan sequester..
Now that their doom and gloom thoughts about the sequester, didnt come true, (just like we said they wouldnt), they want to claim its Obamas. Their very hypocritical, and dont even mind embarassing themself.
psssst....remember the great recession? That might have had something to do with the unemployment rate.
Just saying.
pss, I thought we're recovering? So you not only have low expectations for "your side", but now need to find excuses.. got it..
I very well remember, the stupidity in the left, proclaiming welfare, and unemployment stimulates, as if they are completely dumbfounded over the idea that money has to be removed from the economy to pay these expenses..
Maybe, just MAYBE, mind you, if the President would propose a REAL budget instead of relying on Congress to keep passing Continuing Resolutions, it would solve the problems.
Has this (expletive deleted) President EVER proposed a REAL, workable, annual budget for the country since he has been in office?
If not, why not?
No, I don't have low expectations, I have realistic expectations. There's a big difference. And the great recession is hardly an excuse.
How realistic is unemployment rates lower than 4.5%?
Tell me how expectations that -$1 from the economy +$1 into the economy = $2 in the economy.
Explain to me this realistic expectations of the newfound Democratic math.
Of course the math doesnt work, which is why the sequester, didnt result in economic collapse, despite most Democratic claims, and why a government shut down, doesnt ruin the credit of the US Government..
The sequester, which actually was an increase in spending, DIDNT CUT ENOUGH...
So are you now going to claim its an Obama sequester after you made threads claiming it was a Paul Ryan one?
I was told that it was Obama's sequester and it was a bad thing. That's what conservatives told me. So you agree with Obama's sequester and that the cuts were a good thing?
Maybe, just MAYBE, mind you, if the President would propose a REAL budget instead of relying on Congress to keep passing Continuing Resolutions, it would solve the problems.
Has this (expletive deleted) President EVER proposed a REAL, workable, annual budget for the country since he has been in office?
If not, why not?
I was told that it was Obama's sequester and it was a bad thing. That's what conservatives told me. So you agree with Obama's sequester and that the cuts were a good thing?
No, you were told that it was Obama's idea and you took that as a bad thing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winter_Sucks
I think Obama has proposed a budget every year.
It was noted a *real* budget. Every year it gets voted down without a single vote of support.
No, you were told that it was Obama's idea and you took that as a bad thing.
It was noted a *real* budget. Every year it gets voted down without a single vote of support.
I was told by our resident conservatives around here that it was Obama's sequester and that it was a bad thing. I'm just wondering why the House GOP now thinks keeping those sequester levels is a good thing. No one has answered that yet.
Also, Obama did propose a real budget. You can disagree with it but you don't get to also decide what the definition of the word budget is.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So you not only have low expectations for "your side", but now need to find excuses.. got it..
