Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
seems DC knew there was a high risk of an attack and still had security forces leave and would not approve additional security. perhaps Hillary, then US Secretary of State, should answer why?
Libs don't want you rubbing their doo doo in their faces. It only works the other way around, remember? Or maybe libs are the types of animals that enjoy consuming their own excrement?
seems DC knew there was a high risk of an attack and still had security forces leave and would not approve additional security. perhaps Hillary, then US Secretary of State, should answer why?
Anyone with half a brain would have seen that there was a high risk of attack -- and Benghazi is in one of the more unstable regions of Libya.
Maybe if Obama weren't so busy spying on France and Germany, he would have detected a problem.
As for Hillary, she believes she is too important to have to ever answer any question and she'll only lie if she did. The liberal lapdog media is doing all it can to sweep this under the rug.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.