Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-26-2013, 04:57 PM
 
Location: Tyler, TX
23,861 posts, read 24,111,507 times
Reputation: 15135

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by lifeexplorer View Post
I do advocate social benefit even welfare; however, I do not want free hand-out.

1. If you receive welfare, you shouldn't allowed to vote.
2. If you receive welfare, you still need to work in some way to "earn" it.
3. The government or the taxpayers aren't responsible for raising your children - they go to foster homes if you can't afford.

If all these requirements exist, I am all for it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by seattlenextyear View Post
Totally agree. Only rich white landowners without disabilities should be allowed to vote.
Do you think you could misrepresent what lifeexplorer said just a little bit better? Like claim he was writing in German or something? You haven't quite left reality completely behind just yet. Almost, but not quite. Try harder next time, and I'm sure you'll get there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-26-2013, 05:05 PM
 
Location: WA
4,242 posts, read 8,775,391 times
Reputation: 2375
Quote:
Originally Posted by swagger View Post
Do you think you could misrepresent what lifeexplorer said just a little bit better? Like claim he was writing in German or something? You haven't quite left reality completely behind just yet. Almost, but not quite. Try harder next time, and I'm sure you'll get there.
Hey, I'm not the one undermining democracy. Perhaps you could try redirecting your anger elsewhere?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2013, 05:12 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia Area
1,720 posts, read 1,316,309 times
Reputation: 1353
A TED Talk on Income Inequality by Nick Hanauer

A TED Talk on Income Inequality by Nick Hanauer - YouTube
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2013, 05:19 PM
 
8,560 posts, read 6,407,829 times
Reputation: 1173
Quote:
Originally Posted by swagger View Post
Do you think you could misrepresent what lifeexplorer said just a little bit better? Like claim he was writing in German or something? You haven't quite left reality completely behind just yet. Almost, but not quite. Try harder next time, and I'm sure you'll get there.
Actually, I thought the seattle post was quite accurate and appropriate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2013, 05:38 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia Area
1,720 posts, read 1,316,309 times
Reputation: 1353
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimRom View Post
The problem with the prison population is that we are incarcerating people for activities that should not be crimes. If you take a look at the link I posted, it shows person-on-person crimes. What it doesn't show is crimes such as drug possession, which is where the majority of the difference in the numbers comes from. So, person on person crime rates are dropping - and have been dropping - for a decade. If crime rate was tied to income inequality, those numbers should have been going up in the last few years as the level of income disparity grew.
You can still argue their incarceration is still the result of income inequality. Drug dealing and drug use are often the result of want or need of income and despair of one's circumstances in life.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2013, 06:08 PM
 
9,470 posts, read 6,969,876 times
Reputation: 2177
Quote:
Originally Posted by AZcardinal402 View Post
Minor inequality is fine and doesn't tend to show any degenerative social issues but substantial inequality always corresponds to higher incidents of murder, property crime, and petty theft. The correlation between socially corosive behavior and low Gini Coefficients is way too significant to ignore.
It is meaningless.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2013, 06:13 PM
 
9,470 posts, read 6,969,876 times
Reputation: 2177
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
Ah and heres the insanity of the right. They seem to think that the left wants everyone to have the same, and thats not true at all. But they frame their argument that way, because actually defending extreme levels of inequality is MUCH harder when they actually look at the data. lifeexplorer......how about this....
No, that's just what YOU WANT TO SAY ABOUT THE RIGHT so as to not try to defend what you do.

The right's complaint about the left, is not that they want everyone to have the same... It's that they exploit every slight inequity to demand the power to control, redistribute, and obstruct, all in the name of "fair" which is neither measurable, nor able to be defined. The issue, is that you want unrestricted and unlimited power in the hands of politicians - and demand that anyone not in agreement with such be damned as immoral, selfish, greedy, and evil.

Quote:
Theres a tiny village of 10 people. it costs 100/mo to survive. theres 2000 worth of money in the village. 9 folks have 90 each, and the tenth has the rest, and he loans the other 9 10/month, and puts the rest in a bank. Is this a good thing? Probably not. No investment will occur, the tenth guy doesnt benefit from it, and the other 9 cant afford it. In fact the infrasructure may have issues. A year later the income drops to 1800.
This is fantasyland. You presume that dollar value is finite, and that we have a shortage of CURRENCY. Neither is true, ergo, your entire premise is pure fiction.

Quote:
vs 9 folks have 140 each, and the tenth has 840. 9 guys spend money to start business's, the tenth guy does as well since he isnt increasing his wealth at the expense of the others.

a year later the tiny village has a income of 3K/yr....
Again, ALL FICTION. This has absolutely NO real life implication, it does not in ANY fashion represent reality.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2013, 06:14 PM
 
Location: Old Bellevue, WA
18,782 posts, read 17,360,856 times
Reputation: 7990
As gov't has gotten bigger, inequality has too. We add one program after another, and the people at the bottom sink lower and lower. Warren Buffett complains that he pays a lower tax rate than his secretary. Buffett has armies of tax lawyers and accountants to minimize his rate. Obama & Buffett's answer to this problem? Why make the tax code even more complex, and while we're at it, add 2700 pages of Obamacare law. Sure you betcha.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2013, 06:14 PM
 
9,470 posts, read 6,969,876 times
Reputation: 2177
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmking View Post
Extremely wealthy families who influence governments. They do exist and they do influence government in order to line their pockets at the expense of the middle class. And that's a fact jack. The extremes have existed in the world and they are fascists governments and dictatorships. The United States is headed for--


plutocracy [pluːˈtɒkrəsɪ]
n pl -cies
1. (Government, Politics & Diplomacy) the rule or control of society by the wealthy
2. (Government, Politics & Diplomacy) a state or government characterized by the rule of the wealthy
3. (Government, Politics & Diplomacy) a class that exercises power by virtue of its wealth
[from Greek ploutokratia government by the rich, from ploutos wealth + -kratia rule, power]
The solution is simple: Remove the power from government. Then government simply cannot line anyone's pockets, nor can it choose winners and losers.

Or, in fewer words: Obey the Constitution.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2013, 06:18 PM
 
Location: The High Plains
525 posts, read 508,658 times
Reputation: 244
Quote:
Originally Posted by pnwmdk View Post
It is meaningless.
You believe that massive gaps between the wealthiest and the poorest is irrelevant and has no negative impact at all?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:25 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top