Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-01-2013, 05:09 PM
 
12,997 posts, read 13,655,023 times
Reputation: 11192

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by banjomike View Post
Gotta be higher than that. A single worker's wages should be high enough to support 2 people at least. Then a couple can support 2 children, or a single worker can support someone unable to work. And the wage has to be higher than just the basics for everyone. Otherwise, we fail.
I disagree. I think it should be just enough to support one person. People on minimum wage should improve their earning potential if they want to start a family.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-01-2013, 05:53 PM
 
45,247 posts, read 26,482,257 times
Reputation: 25001
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattee01 View Post
Great! Because the attacks on the working American havent been bad enough the past few decades, lets just turn them into indentured servants! It's not demand for skill that's at work right now, it's demand for jobs, and right now people would take half of minimum wage most likely if it meant having a job. Throwing the last remaining pieces in business's court is certainly the worse of two evils.
Paying tribute to ceasar is what has made us all indentured servants.
But you are half correct, if abolished, new jobs would be created that would pay less then min.wage.
Those working for minimum wage now, most likely would not be impacted.
Are you afraid of unemployment figures improving and slaves leaving the government plantation?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2013, 06:01 PM
 
582 posts, read 779,756 times
Reputation: 766
The ONLY thing that min wage does is set a index point for other jobs. It doesn't matter if you set the min wage at $0, $7.50 or $150 per hour. All the other jobs and the value of the dollar would adjust so those making min wage would still have a true income that matches their worth. Unemployment would go up in the short term until things leveled out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2013, 06:31 PM
 
Location: NJ
18,665 posts, read 19,983,283 times
Reputation: 7315
IMO, it should remain at $7.25 until unemployment drops to 5% or less, at which point it should be raised only proportinate to the BLS main COL index.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2013, 06:45 PM
 
582 posts, read 779,756 times
Reputation: 766
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobtn View Post
IMO, it should remain at $7.25 until unemployment drops to 5% or less, at which point it should be raised only proportinate to the BLS main COL index.
Indexing the min wage to COL is an EXTREMELY bad idea. All it does is lead to higher inflation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2013, 06:47 PM
 
Location: NJ
18,665 posts, read 19,983,283 times
Reputation: 7315
Quote:
Originally Posted by nealrm View Post
Indexing the min wage to COL is an EXTREMELY bad idea. All it does is lead to higher inflation.

It beats watching it raised several times the COL rate. And it would freeze it at $7.25 for many years to come, as 5% is not going to happen in the near future.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2013, 10:22 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,092,930 times
Reputation: 17865
Quote:
Originally Posted by WestCobb View Post
Here's a question for those who don't support high wages. What do you think the lowest legal wage should be? $0?
Whatever people will accept. The minimum is nothing more than benchmark for what minimum wage work is worth in dollar values.

If you raise the minimum from $7.50 to $10 then the $10 worker is now $12.50, $12.50 is now worth $15.00...

The $7.50 McDonald's meal goes to $10, the $10 meal at the local restaurant now cost $12.50 and the $12.50 meal at a nicer restaurant rises to $15.00

Nobody went anywhere....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2013, 11:14 PM
 
Location: South Carolina
3,023 posts, read 2,277,007 times
Reputation: 2168
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
Whatever people will accept. The minimum is nothing more than benchmark for what minimum wage work is worth in dollar values.

If you raise the minimum from $7.50 to $10 then the $10 worker is now $12.50, $12.50 is now worth $15.00...

The $7.50 McDonald's meal goes to $10, the $10 meal at the local restaurant now cost $12.50 and the $12.50 meal at a nicer restaurant rises to $15.00

Nobody went anywhere....
I think you are overrating how much min wage will affect prices. Min wage has barely gone up but prices has raised quite a lot. Most studies I have seen say raising the min wage a dollar or two will not raise prices that much.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2013, 11:46 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,092,930 times
Reputation: 17865
Quote:
Originally Posted by matt1984 View Post
Most studies I have seen say raising the min wage a dollar or two will not raise prices that much.
Most studies do not take into account pay increases across the board, it's not just the minimum wage that increases. If you're making $10 becsue the value of your work is more than minimum and the minimum is increased to $10 are you going to accept minimum? Of course not and you shouldn't, that ripples through the entire workforce. Everyone's pay scale increases and that drives cost up across the board.

If you are making minimum and want to increase your purchasing power you can't simply increase the minimum wage, you need to increase the value of your work.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2013, 11:50 PM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,872,615 times
Reputation: 20030
i think that it should be up to the STATES to determine what the minimum wage, if any, should be in that particular state. the problem with a federal minimum wage law is that it is one size fits all, and that doesnt work.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:03 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top