Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-06-2014, 08:41 AM
 
Location: Georgia, on the Florida line, right above Tallahassee
10,471 posts, read 15,838,455 times
Reputation: 6438

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by pnwmdk View Post
No ISP will EVER do that. Just like no cell phone company will prevent you from calling phones of their competitors.

The ISP's interest is in retaining customers. The moment the customer finds that their ISP is selectively blocking their access, the competitors will swoop in and their customer base will VANISH faster than the dot-coms with no plan to make money went broke.

All you will do is add vast amounts of cost with NO benefits, ANYWHERE to anyone.
This argument assumes that only one ISP will make that change and the others will still offer more for less. What's to stop all of them from making the change? Satellite TV used to be free. I know - my uncle had one of those huge dishes when I was a kid. It was AWESOME. He had like 5 bazillion channels. I watched Thai boxing. THAI BOXING from Thailand. At home, we had the 3 regular channels + PBS. Thai boxing was pretty much absent.

Originally, all channels could be received in the clear (ITC) and free of charge. In 1986, HBO began using the now-obsolete VideoCipher system to encrypt their channels. This met with much protest from owners of big-dish systems, most of which had no other option at the time for receiving such channels. Eventually HBO allowed dish owners to subscribe directly to their service, although at a price much higher ($12.95/month) than what cable subscribers were paying. This led to the 1986 attack on HBO's transponder on Galaxy 1 by Captain Midnight. One by one, all commercial channels followed HBO's lead and began encrypting their channels.

Television receive-only - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-06-2014, 08:44 AM
 
724 posts, read 593,680 times
Reputation: 550
Quote:
Originally Posted by Egbert View Post
Eventually due to bandwidth issues I think the internet will become like a utility where you pay by usage in that a person who is constantly downloading stuff will pay more then a dude who only uses e-mail. Whether or not ISPs will control download speeds is a matter of lobbying. If the government lets them I think they definitely will.
Its already kind of going that way. I tend to agree with you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:07 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top