Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-01-2014, 05:51 PM
 
30,065 posts, read 18,670,668 times
Reputation: 20884

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Nothing in that report says that the CIA said anything of the sort.

Correct-

That the White House had nothing to do with it is what liberals want to believe so badly that they read things into information that is not there.

The report says that the CIA reported to the White House that the attack was not a spontaneous protest. In no way was the White House exonerated. In fact, the report seems much more damning for the White House.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-01-2014, 05:53 PM
 
15,047 posts, read 8,874,591 times
Reputation: 9510
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Where did I day it was anything new? Do you actually have anything to contribute to my question?
You said it was sad that people were okay with politicians outright lying, and I pointed out that it was ever thus in politics. Sorry if you were looking for some grand revelation to that rather naive statement.

Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
What you added was a defense of the lying.
If by that you mean I stated a truth, sure, whatever you say.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2014, 06:00 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,294 posts, read 26,217,746 times
Reputation: 15645
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Because they knew the attack had nothing to do with it. There are many examples of a husband killing their wife. When such a thing happens it's not O.K. to blame the husband even when you know it wasn't him because you would rather not be honest.



Those who deny and lie about the past will repeat it.
There is no proof that it was a lie, easy to look back on decisions that were made based on current information, like the invasion of Iraq. There is more information now than back in 2012, that does not mean it was intentional.

Hopefully after tomorrow everyone will be satisfied that this is the end.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2014, 06:03 PM
 
Location: Swansea, Massachusetts
167 posts, read 330,172 times
Reputation: 128
It's incredible how most media outlets turned a blind eye to this, for the most part.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2014, 06:03 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,294 posts, read 26,217,746 times
Reputation: 15645
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
Correct-

That the White House had nothing to do with it is what liberals want to believe so badly that they read things into information that is not there.

The report says that the CIA reported to the White House that the attack was not a spontaneous protest. In no way was the White House exonerated. In fact, the report seems much more damning for the White House.
That is not exactly what it indicates relative to the White House. I don't give much credibility to unnamed sources 2 years later unless they put their name on the statement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2014, 06:04 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,294 posts, read 26,217,746 times
Reputation: 15645
Quote:
Originally Posted by StanleyCupChamps2011 View Post
It's incredible how most media outlets turned a blind eye to this, for the most part.
It's incredible that you haven't noticed the media attention for the last 2 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2014, 06:12 PM
 
Location: Alameda, CA
7,605 posts, read 4,846,404 times
Reputation: 1438
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
"The source" claims conflicting reports but those there say there weren't any conflicting reports.

Imaginary sources on the ground are now being blamed.
From the Senate intelligence report. There were conflicting reports.

http://www.intelligence.senate.gov/b...4/benghazi.pdf

A dearth of clear and definitive HUMINT or eyewitness reporting led IC
analysts to rely on open press reports and limited SIGINT reporting that incorrectly
attributed the origins of the Benghazi attacks to "protests," over first-hand accounts
from U.S. officials on the ground. CIA's January 4, 2013, Analytic Line Review
found that "[a ]pproximately a dozen reports that included press accounts, public
statements by AAS members, HUMINT reporting, DOD reporting, and signals
intelligence
all stated or strongly suggested that a protest occurred outside of the
Mission facility just prior to the attacks."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2014, 06:14 PM
 
Location: Alameda, CA
7,605 posts, read 4,846,404 times
Reputation: 1438
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
Correct-

That the White House had nothing to do with it is what liberals want to believe so badly that they read things into information that is not there.

The report says that the CIA reported to the White House that the attack was not a spontaneous protest. In no way was the White House exonerated. In fact, the report seems much more damning for the White House.
From the CIA authored talking points. The protests in Cairo were over the video.

We believe based on currently available information that the attacks in Benghazi were spontaneously inspired by the protests at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo and evolved into a direct assault against the U.S. Consulate and subsequently its annex.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2014, 06:17 PM
 
12,265 posts, read 6,474,011 times
Reputation: 9435
Whatever the case, it certainly wouldn`t have affected the election. Who cared about the 11 attacks when Gomer was president? Maybe you people should go back to blaming the media for your loss in 2102.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2014, 06:17 PM
 
Location: Inland Empire, Calif
2,884 posts, read 5,642,077 times
Reputation: 2803
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
It's incredible that you haven't noticed the media attention for the last 2 years.
comrad obama and killery murdered four good American's and have been lying about it every since. tomorrow will be their reckoning.. they should bot be in prison..
..and you, support a communist president...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:45 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top