Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It does not take a mathematic to do the numbers. But if those 55 million had been born and minus the 2% that may have been gay by averages and say half of those 53.9 million straights grew up and had two kids together, we would have another 53.9 million also half of which would have an average of 2 kids and another generation getting ready to do the same. Instead of being at 314 million people in the USA, we would be approaching somewhere over 475,000,000 (475 million) people in the US. Unemployment is already bad, pollution is bad, we are pushing our resources to their limit and how does it make sense to even bemoan those 55 million that were never human beings to begin with? We are not rabbits or cows breeding, we are far from ever going extinct with over 7 billion of us on the planet.
We cannot find homes for just the 100,000 foster children available for adoption TODAY, nor can we take care of the additional 400,000 children who are in the system but are not available for adoption. Who would take care of 55 million?
We cannot find homes for just the 100,000 foster children available for adoption TODAY, nor can we take care of the additional 400,000 children who are in the system but are not available for adoption. Who would take care of 55 million?
Not society's problem, at least as far as Conservatives are concerned. Once they have "saved" that cluster of cells, their responsibility to the child that will result is over. Let those children starve or die for lack of healthcare or live in the streets. Not their problem.
Not society's problem, at least as far as Conservatives are concerned. Once they have "saved" that cluster of cells, their responsibility to the child that will result is over. Let those children starve or die for lack of healthcare or live in the streets. Not their problem.
No need to exaggerate unless you can actually prove that there children in the US starving .
Why the hell should I look at a sonogram? It's tantamount to showing me a malignant tumour or diseased appendix and asking me "Are you sure you want that thing out of you?"
if all it equates to is a "malignant tumor" or a "diseased appendix", why do Democrat politicians claim pro-abortion women really struggle with the decision as to whether to have an abortion ?
No need to exaggerate unless you can actually prove that there children in the US starving .
"As many as 17 million children nationwide are struggling with what is known as food insecurity. To put it another way, one in four children in the country is living without consistent access to enough nutritious food to live a healthy life, according to the study, "Map the Meal Child Food Insecurity 2011."
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,400,252 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier
You seem to not understand that left alone, and barring natural causes of death within the womb, a fetus will become a baby, which means that it is a human life.
You seem incapable of understanding "will become" DOES NOT EQUAL"is"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier
Why do you support the malicious desruction of human life?
Why do you ask baseless, inane questions based on your ASSumptions rather than fact?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier
Why don't you want there to be life equality?
Why don't you stop with the inane ASSumptions?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.