Will Rumsfeld ever pay for war crimes? (interviews, accuse, Clinton)

[CDusr]

Originally Posted by hyperthetic

9/11: Donald rumsfeld - "what is building 7?" - youtube

lol.

[T-310]

Will Rumsfeld ever pay for war crimes?

Will Obama ever admit he is an idiot? Biden? Pelosi?

[T-310]

Originally Posted by presidentbunny

Obama is only human. Don't compare him to a war criminal and don't change the subject, mate.

What war criminal? Obama is criminally stupid as are his bots.

And I can say what I damn please.

[SHABAZZ310]

Rumsfeld will never be tried. The Hague is a joke and was only setup "primarily" to prosecute African leaders. If the ICC ever decided to go after an ex-American leader there would be hell to pay. They can only go after the criminals that are weak...

[Rggr]

Another shrill political argument - impeach, war crime, hate, war on ____ etc.

[T-310]

Originally Posted by SHABAZZ310

Rumsfeld will never be tried. The Hague is a joke and was only setup "primarily" to prosecute African leaders. If the ICC ever decided to go after an ex-American leader there would be hell to pay. They can only go after the criminals that are weak...

I.e. Obama. Weak.

[tickyul]

YAWN!

Guess what, we probably still "torture" people on an as-needed basis.

Remember WW2, we felt the need to incinerate civilian cities all over Japan and Germany????

Yes, for a nation to survive, sometimes it must do some pretty nasty things.

[SHABAZZ310]

Originally Posted by T-310

I.e. Obama. Weak.

I'm not getting what you're trying to say. Do you mean Obama is weak and the ICC will go after him when he leaves office? My statement wasn't in reference to the leader, but the leaders country. The ICC can prosecute a top official from the Congo but they wont have any luck with countries like the US & UK...

[dreamofmonterey]

U.S. Officials Created a False Link Between Iraq and 9/11

5 hours after the 9/11 attacks, Donald Rumsfeld said

“my interest is to hit Saddam”.
He also said “Go massive . . . Sweep it all up. Things related and not.”
And at 2:40 p.m. on September 11th, in a memorandum of discussions between top administration officials, several lines below the statement “judge whether good enough [to] hit S.H. [that is, Saddam Hussein] at same time”, is the statement “Hard to get a good case.” In other words, top officials knew that there wasn’t a good case that Hussein was behind 9/11, but they wanted to use the 9/11 attacks as an excuse to justify war with Iraq anyway.
Moreover, “Ten days after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, President Bush was told in a highly classified briefing that the U.S. intelligence community had no evidence linking the Iraqi regime of Saddam Hussein to the [9/11] attacks and that there was scant credible evidence that Iraq had any significant collaborative ties with Al Qaeda”.
And a Defense Intelligence Terrorism Summary issued in February 2002 by the United States Defense Intelligence Agency cast significant doubt on the possibility of a Saddam Hussein-al-Qaeda conspiracy.
And yet Bush, Cheney and other top administration officials claimed repeatedly for years that Saddam was behind 9/11. See this analysis. Indeed, Bush administration officials apparently swore in a lawsuit that Saddam was behind 9/11.

[Wapasha]

Originally Posted by wutitiz

what exactly was the crime? I would agree that Rummy was misguided, but not criminal. Were JFK and LBJ also war criminals? Was Woodrow WIlson? Moronic.

What about 0bama's war crimes? The man did not even bother to consult with the Congress or the people, before he launched bombers into Libya, a country that was bothering the US our our people, not a threat to the US, nor our allies, nor our citizens. And yet, 0bama destroyed their military, dissolved their government, and his action helped lead to the senseless murder of their president.